朝鲜和北方界线

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Terence Roehrig
{"title":"朝鲜和北方界线","authors":"Terence Roehrig","doi":"10.3172/NKR.5.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionWhen negotiators concluded the Korean War armistice in July 1953 to bring an end to the hostilities on the peninsula, one of the important dimensions of the agreeU.S. ment was delineating a border between the two Koreas. On land, this division was the military demarcation line (MDL) that is surrounded on both sides by a 2.5-milewide demilitarized zone (DMZ). Despite efforts to specify sea borders, the armistice was silent on a maritime demarcation line. To address this issue, the United Nations Command (UNC) unilaterally declared a maritime border called the Northern Limit Line (NLL) to separate opposing naval forces. Since that time, the NLL has been a source of contention, erupting into an armed clash in 1999 and again in 2002 when North and South Korean forces fought in the West Sea (Yellow Sea). Despite efforts to solve the dispute, there has been little progress and the disagreement over the NLL remains a serious flashpoint for conflict between North and South Korea.If the issue ever went before an international tribunal for resolution, international law is probably in North Korea's favor; the court would likely move the line south but not as far as the DPRK wishes. However, this will not happen so long as North Korea remains a security threat to the South; Seoul will not allow the matter to be taken before a court. This article argues that the NLL will have a chance of being changed only through a political process that will not happen until the tension level and security concerns in the region decrease. North Korea will need to promote a more stable security environment by moderating its sometimes provocative behavior while also continuing to demonstrate its opposition to the NLL. The remainder of this paper will address the origin of the NLL and the history of dispute, North Korea's interests in altering the line, and, finally, recommendations for how North Korea might proceed to address the dispute.History of the Northern Limit LineThe Northern Limit Line was drawn at the end of the Korean War as a maritime boundary between the two Koreas in the West Sea. During armistice talks, negotiators settled on a land border, the MDL, and granted the UNC the rights to five small islands on the west coast of Korea.1 Despite lying off the North Korean coast, the islands were under UNC control at the time of the armistice. However, negotiators could not agree on a maritime boundary due to disagreements over the extent of North Korea's territorial sea. Moreover, South Korean President Syngman Rhee had made known his displeasure with the armistice and pledged to continue the fight if given the opportunity.2 To ensure naval forces and fishing boats did not spark a renewal of the conflict, on August 30, 1953, the UNC promulgated the NLL. The line was drawn approximately mid-channel between the Ongjin Peninsula and the five islands under UNC/ROK control. For the next 20 years, little was said between the two Koreas regarding the NLL, and North Korea did not lodge any formal protests regarding the line.North Korea appears to have made its first formal protest of the NLL in 1973, at the 346th Military Armistice Commission meeting where the DPRK representative proclaimed that the five islands under UNC/ROK control as specified in the armistice are in DPRK territorial waters. In addition, transit to and from these islands would require North Korean permission.3 However, Pyongyang did not challenge ROK control of the five islands. In 1977, North Korea proclaimed two additional maritime zones: its 200-nautical-mile economic exclusion zone (EEZ)4 and a 50-nautical-mile military boundary zone. The designation of a military boundary zone was unusual and not in keeping with international law. According to DPRK authorities, the purpose of the military zone was \"to reliably safeguard the economic sea zone\" and defend \"militarily the national interests and sovereignty of the country.\"5 The DPRK announcement also stated that within this zone and the sky above, foreign military vessels and planes are prohibited, and any civilian ships, excluding fishing boats, must obtain approval before entering the zone. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"North Korea and the Northern Limit Line\",\"authors\":\"Terence Roehrig\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/NKR.5.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionWhen negotiators concluded the Korean War armistice in July 1953 to bring an end to the hostilities on the peninsula, one of the important dimensions of the agreeU.S. ment was delineating a border between the two Koreas. On land, this division was the military demarcation line (MDL) that is surrounded on both sides by a 2.5-milewide demilitarized zone (DMZ). Despite efforts to specify sea borders, the armistice was silent on a maritime demarcation line. To address this issue, the United Nations Command (UNC) unilaterally declared a maritime border called the Northern Limit Line (NLL) to separate opposing naval forces. Since that time, the NLL has been a source of contention, erupting into an armed clash in 1999 and again in 2002 when North and South Korean forces fought in the West Sea (Yellow Sea). Despite efforts to solve the dispute, there has been little progress and the disagreement over the NLL remains a serious flashpoint for conflict between North and South Korea.If the issue ever went before an international tribunal for resolution, international law is probably in North Korea's favor; the court would likely move the line south but not as far as the DPRK wishes. However, this will not happen so long as North Korea remains a security threat to the South; Seoul will not allow the matter to be taken before a court. This article argues that the NLL will have a chance of being changed only through a political process that will not happen until the tension level and security concerns in the region decrease. North Korea will need to promote a more stable security environment by moderating its sometimes provocative behavior while also continuing to demonstrate its opposition to the NLL. The remainder of this paper will address the origin of the NLL and the history of dispute, North Korea's interests in altering the line, and, finally, recommendations for how North Korea might proceed to address the dispute.History of the Northern Limit LineThe Northern Limit Line was drawn at the end of the Korean War as a maritime boundary between the two Koreas in the West Sea. During armistice talks, negotiators settled on a land border, the MDL, and granted the UNC the rights to five small islands on the west coast of Korea.1 Despite lying off the North Korean coast, the islands were under UNC control at the time of the armistice. However, negotiators could not agree on a maritime boundary due to disagreements over the extent of North Korea's territorial sea. Moreover, South Korean President Syngman Rhee had made known his displeasure with the armistice and pledged to continue the fight if given the opportunity.2 To ensure naval forces and fishing boats did not spark a renewal of the conflict, on August 30, 1953, the UNC promulgated the NLL. The line was drawn approximately mid-channel between the Ongjin Peninsula and the five islands under UNC/ROK control. For the next 20 years, little was said between the two Koreas regarding the NLL, and North Korea did not lodge any formal protests regarding the line.North Korea appears to have made its first formal protest of the NLL in 1973, at the 346th Military Armistice Commission meeting where the DPRK representative proclaimed that the five islands under UNC/ROK control as specified in the armistice are in DPRK territorial waters. In addition, transit to and from these islands would require North Korean permission.3 However, Pyongyang did not challenge ROK control of the five islands. In 1977, North Korea proclaimed two additional maritime zones: its 200-nautical-mile economic exclusion zone (EEZ)4 and a 50-nautical-mile military boundary zone. The designation of a military boundary zone was unusual and not in keeping with international law. According to DPRK authorities, the purpose of the military zone was \\\"to reliably safeguard the economic sea zone\\\" and defend \\\"militarily the national interests and sovereignty of the country.\\\"5 The DPRK announcement also stated that within this zone and the sky above, foreign military vessels and planes are prohibited, and any civilian ships, excluding fishing boats, must obtain approval before entering the zone. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":40013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North Korean Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North Korean Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.5.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.5.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

当谈判者于1953年7月达成朝鲜战争停战协议,结束了半岛上的敌对状态时,该协议的一个重要方面是美国和美国的关系。当时朝鲜正在划定朝韩两国的边界。在陆地上,这个分界线是军事分界线(MDL),两边被2.5英里宽的非军事区(DMZ)包围。尽管各方努力明确海上边界,但停战协议对海上分界线只字未提。为了解决这一问题,联合国军司令部单方面宣布了“北方界线”(NLL),将两国海军分隔开来。自那以后,NLL一直是争议的源头,在1999年和2002年爆发了武装冲突,当时朝鲜和韩国军队在西海(黄海)交战。尽管各方努力解决争端,但进展甚微,在NLL问题上的分歧仍是朝韩冲突的一个严重导火索。如果这个问题被提交到国际法庭解决,国际法可能会对朝鲜有利;法庭可能会将分界线南移,但不会像朝鲜希望的那样远。但是,只要北韩仍然是韩国的安全威胁,这种情况就不会发生。政府不会允许向法院提起诉讼。这篇文章认为,NLL只有通过政治进程才有可能改变,而政治进程在该地区的紧张程度和安全担忧减少之前是不会发生的。朝鲜将需要通过缓和其有时的挑衅行为来促进更稳定的安全环境,同时继续表明其对NLL的反对。本文的其余部分将讨论NLL的起源和争议的历史,朝鲜改变这条线的利益,最后,对朝鲜如何着手解决这一争议提出建议。“北方界线”是在6•25战争结束时划定的,是南北韩在西海的海上分界线。在停战谈判期间,谈判代表确定了陆地边界,即军事分界线,并授予联合国军司令部对朝鲜西海岸五个小岛的权利。1尽管这些岛屿位于朝鲜海岸外,但在停战时仍在联合国军司令部的控制之下。然而,由于对朝鲜领海的范围存在分歧,谈判代表未能就海上边界达成一致。此外,韩国总统李承晚已经表明了他对停战协定的不满,并保证如果有机会将继续战斗为了确保海军和渔船不会再次引发冲突,1953年8月30日,联合国军司令部颁布了NLL。这条线大约画在瓮津半岛和联合国军/韩国控制下的五个岛屿之间的海峡中间。在接下来的20年里,南北双方几乎没有就NLL问题发表任何言论,朝鲜也没有就NLL问题提出任何正式抗议。朝鲜似乎是在1973年第346次军事停战委员会会议上首次对NLL提出正式抗议,当时朝鲜代表宣布,停战协定中规定的联合国军司令部/韩国控制下的五个岛屿在朝鲜领海内。此外,进出这些岛屿需要得到朝鲜的许可然而,平壤并没有挑战韩国对这五个岛屿的控制。1977年,朝鲜宣布了另外两个海域:200海里的经济禁区(EEZ)和50海里的军事边界区。划定军事划界区是不寻常的,不符合国际法。据朝鲜当局称,设立该军事区的目的是“可靠地保卫经济海域”,并“在军事上捍卫国家利益和主权”。5 .朝鲜的公告还指出,禁止外国军用船只和飞机进入该区域及其上空,任何民用船只(渔船除外)在进入该区域前必须获得批准。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
North Korea and the Northern Limit Line
IntroductionWhen negotiators concluded the Korean War armistice in July 1953 to bring an end to the hostilities on the peninsula, one of the important dimensions of the agreeU.S. ment was delineating a border between the two Koreas. On land, this division was the military demarcation line (MDL) that is surrounded on both sides by a 2.5-milewide demilitarized zone (DMZ). Despite efforts to specify sea borders, the armistice was silent on a maritime demarcation line. To address this issue, the United Nations Command (UNC) unilaterally declared a maritime border called the Northern Limit Line (NLL) to separate opposing naval forces. Since that time, the NLL has been a source of contention, erupting into an armed clash in 1999 and again in 2002 when North and South Korean forces fought in the West Sea (Yellow Sea). Despite efforts to solve the dispute, there has been little progress and the disagreement over the NLL remains a serious flashpoint for conflict between North and South Korea.If the issue ever went before an international tribunal for resolution, international law is probably in North Korea's favor; the court would likely move the line south but not as far as the DPRK wishes. However, this will not happen so long as North Korea remains a security threat to the South; Seoul will not allow the matter to be taken before a court. This article argues that the NLL will have a chance of being changed only through a political process that will not happen until the tension level and security concerns in the region decrease. North Korea will need to promote a more stable security environment by moderating its sometimes provocative behavior while also continuing to demonstrate its opposition to the NLL. The remainder of this paper will address the origin of the NLL and the history of dispute, North Korea's interests in altering the line, and, finally, recommendations for how North Korea might proceed to address the dispute.History of the Northern Limit LineThe Northern Limit Line was drawn at the end of the Korean War as a maritime boundary between the two Koreas in the West Sea. During armistice talks, negotiators settled on a land border, the MDL, and granted the UNC the rights to five small islands on the west coast of Korea.1 Despite lying off the North Korean coast, the islands were under UNC control at the time of the armistice. However, negotiators could not agree on a maritime boundary due to disagreements over the extent of North Korea's territorial sea. Moreover, South Korean President Syngman Rhee had made known his displeasure with the armistice and pledged to continue the fight if given the opportunity.2 To ensure naval forces and fishing boats did not spark a renewal of the conflict, on August 30, 1953, the UNC promulgated the NLL. The line was drawn approximately mid-channel between the Ongjin Peninsula and the five islands under UNC/ROK control. For the next 20 years, little was said between the two Koreas regarding the NLL, and North Korea did not lodge any formal protests regarding the line.North Korea appears to have made its first formal protest of the NLL in 1973, at the 346th Military Armistice Commission meeting where the DPRK representative proclaimed that the five islands under UNC/ROK control as specified in the armistice are in DPRK territorial waters. In addition, transit to and from these islands would require North Korean permission.3 However, Pyongyang did not challenge ROK control of the five islands. In 1977, North Korea proclaimed two additional maritime zones: its 200-nautical-mile economic exclusion zone (EEZ)4 and a 50-nautical-mile military boundary zone. The designation of a military boundary zone was unusual and not in keeping with international law. According to DPRK authorities, the purpose of the military zone was "to reliably safeguard the economic sea zone" and defend "militarily the national interests and sovereignty of the country."5 The DPRK announcement also stated that within this zone and the sky above, foreign military vessels and planes are prohibited, and any civilian ships, excluding fishing boats, must obtain approval before entering the zone. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信