管理人员的教师评价:布鲁克林学院的经验。

E. A. Brown
{"title":"管理人员的教师评价:布鲁克林学院的经验。","authors":"E. A. Brown","doi":"10.2307/40225145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a good many years much attention has been given to the evaluation of teachers and scholars, yet, despite growing faculty interest in the question, little has been said about the evaluation of administrators. Over the past three and a half years a faculty committee for the evaluation of administrators has been functioning at Brooklyn College, one of the largest units of the City University of New York. As one of the few such bodies in existence, its operations have attracted interest, but as yet no account of its work has been written. The process of establishing the committee was beset with difficulties; determination of its composition and mandate required long discussion and complex negotiation; definition of its procedures was not easy, and the committee continues to wrestle with the problem of clarifying its goal and methodology and of assessing the impact of its work. An account of the experiences of the committee may prove useful to faculty on other campuses who are seeking to define their own rights and responsibilities with relation to those of the administrators with whom they work.","PeriodicalId":87494,"journal":{"name":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","volume":"64 1","pages":"298-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225145","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College.\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40225145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a good many years much attention has been given to the evaluation of teachers and scholars, yet, despite growing faculty interest in the question, little has been said about the evaluation of administrators. Over the past three and a half years a faculty committee for the evaluation of administrators has been functioning at Brooklyn College, one of the largest units of the City University of New York. As one of the few such bodies in existence, its operations have attracted interest, but as yet no account of its work has been written. The process of establishing the committee was beset with difficulties; determination of its composition and mandate required long discussion and complex negotiation; definition of its procedures was not easy, and the committee continues to wrestle with the problem of clarifying its goal and methodology and of assessing the impact of its work. An account of the experiences of the committee may prove useful to faculty on other campuses who are seeking to define their own rights and responsibilities with relation to those of the administrators with whom they work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"298-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225145\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

多年来,人们对教师和学者的评价给予了很大的关注,然而,尽管教师们对这个问题的兴趣越来越大,但对管理人员的评价却很少提及。在过去三年半的时间里,纽约城市大学最大的学院之一布鲁克林学院(Brooklyn College)成立了一个教员委员会,负责对管理人员进行评估。作为现存为数不多的这类机构之一,它的运作引起了人们的兴趣,但迄今为止还没有关于它的工作的记载。成立委员会的过程困难重重;确定其组成和任务需要进行长时间的讨论和复杂的谈判;确定其程序并不容易,委员会继续努力解决澄清其目标和方法以及评估其工作影响的问题。对委员会经验的叙述可能会对其他学校的教师有用,因为他们正在努力界定自己与与他们一起工作的管理人员的权利和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College.
For a good many years much attention has been given to the evaluation of teachers and scholars, yet, despite growing faculty interest in the question, little has been said about the evaluation of administrators. Over the past three and a half years a faculty committee for the evaluation of administrators has been functioning at Brooklyn College, one of the largest units of the City University of New York. As one of the few such bodies in existence, its operations have attracted interest, but as yet no account of its work has been written. The process of establishing the committee was beset with difficulties; determination of its composition and mandate required long discussion and complex negotiation; definition of its procedures was not easy, and the committee continues to wrestle with the problem of clarifying its goal and methodology and of assessing the impact of its work. An account of the experiences of the committee may prove useful to faculty on other campuses who are seeking to define their own rights and responsibilities with relation to those of the administrators with whom they work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信