从1955年到2007年10月,美国对朝鲜的制裁和财政部的行动

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Karin J. Lee, J. Choi
{"title":"从1955年到2007年10月,美国对朝鲜的制裁和财政部的行动","authors":"Karin J. Lee, J. Choi","doi":"10.3172/NKR.4.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OverviewThe history of U.S. sanctions against the DPRK can be divided into six stages. The U.S. maintained fairly comprehensive economic sanctions from the time of the Korean War until 1989, occasionally increasing the level of restriction during this period. Between 1989 and 1995 the export of goods from the U.S. commercial sector was permitted solely for the purpose of meeting \"basic human needs.\" A more extensive easing of sanctions accompanied the negotiation of the Agreed Framework in 1994.In 2000, President Clinton eased many remaining trade and travel sanctions in response to the DPRK's 1999 voluntary halt in missile testing. Licensing and trade regulations on most items for civilian use were significantly relaxed at this time.Although the George W. Bush administration's approach to the DPRK differed considerably from that of the Clinton administration, no economic sanctions were re-imposed during President Bush's first term, although two North Korean companies were cited for WMD and missile proliferation (Rennack).In March 2005, North Korea declared that because \"the DPRK-U.S. dialogue\" on which the missile test moratorium was based had been \"totally suspended when the Bush administration took office in 2001,\" the DPRK is \"not bound to the moratorium on the missile launch at present.\" The DPRK then tested short range missiles first on May 1, 2005, and again on March 8, 2006. These short range tests, which did not break any international laws, garnered only limited public attention and condemnation from the United States and international community, and no U.S. economic sanctions were re-imposed.Instead, in this fifth phase, the U.S. administration focused on financial sanc- tions, including the assets of individual companies suspected of proliferating weapons of mass destruction (WMD). On June 28, 2005, the United States froze the assets under U.S. jurisdiction of three DPRK firms that it accused of engaging in WMD proliferation, and in October 2005 froze the assets of an additional eight firms (Rennack).In September 2005 the U.S. Department of Treasury designated Banco Delta Asia as a bank of \"primary money laundry concern.\" This action, coupled with a December 2005 Treasury Department advisory warning financial institutions against transactions with the DPRK, proved to have considerable impact on the DPRK's ability to do business, and may have had a greater impact than sanctions that had been lifted during the Clinton administration.In March 2006, the U.S. Department of Treasury accused a Swiss company of doing business with one of the sanctioned North Korean firms, and froze the assets of the Swiss company and its owner and banned U.S. entities from doing business with the firm or owner. In April 2006 the Department of Treasury issued an Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulation banning U.S. persons from owning or leasing North Korean-flagged vessels.On July 5, 2006, the DPRK test-launched an array of ballistic missiles, including a long-range Taepodong-2. The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1695 ten days later, although, as with the earlier short-range tests, the long range test broke no international laws. Even with the adoption of 1695, the Bush Administration did not immediately re-impose sanctions lifted by the Clinton administration in exchange for the moratorium.North Korea tested a nuclear device on October 9, 2006, after which the UN Security Council quickly adopted UN Resolution 1718 in response. In January 2007, the Bush administration re-imposed some of the sanctions lifted in the Clinton era, and published a list of luxury items prohibited for export to the DPRK, ushering in a sixth phase of sanctions.In the \"Initial Actions\" agreement signed by the Six Parties on February 13, 2007, the United States agreed to \"begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state sponsor of terrorism and advance the process of terminating the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to the DPRK. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. Sanctions and Treasury Department Actions against North Korea from 1955 to October 2007\",\"authors\":\"Karin J. Lee, J. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/NKR.4.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OverviewThe history of U.S. sanctions against the DPRK can be divided into six stages. The U.S. maintained fairly comprehensive economic sanctions from the time of the Korean War until 1989, occasionally increasing the level of restriction during this period. Between 1989 and 1995 the export of goods from the U.S. commercial sector was permitted solely for the purpose of meeting \\\"basic human needs.\\\" A more extensive easing of sanctions accompanied the negotiation of the Agreed Framework in 1994.In 2000, President Clinton eased many remaining trade and travel sanctions in response to the DPRK's 1999 voluntary halt in missile testing. Licensing and trade regulations on most items for civilian use were significantly relaxed at this time.Although the George W. Bush administration's approach to the DPRK differed considerably from that of the Clinton administration, no economic sanctions were re-imposed during President Bush's first term, although two North Korean companies were cited for WMD and missile proliferation (Rennack).In March 2005, North Korea declared that because \\\"the DPRK-U.S. dialogue\\\" on which the missile test moratorium was based had been \\\"totally suspended when the Bush administration took office in 2001,\\\" the DPRK is \\\"not bound to the moratorium on the missile launch at present.\\\" The DPRK then tested short range missiles first on May 1, 2005, and again on March 8, 2006. These short range tests, which did not break any international laws, garnered only limited public attention and condemnation from the United States and international community, and no U.S. economic sanctions were re-imposed.Instead, in this fifth phase, the U.S. administration focused on financial sanc- tions, including the assets of individual companies suspected of proliferating weapons of mass destruction (WMD). On June 28, 2005, the United States froze the assets under U.S. jurisdiction of three DPRK firms that it accused of engaging in WMD proliferation, and in October 2005 froze the assets of an additional eight firms (Rennack).In September 2005 the U.S. Department of Treasury designated Banco Delta Asia as a bank of \\\"primary money laundry concern.\\\" This action, coupled with a December 2005 Treasury Department advisory warning financial institutions against transactions with the DPRK, proved to have considerable impact on the DPRK's ability to do business, and may have had a greater impact than sanctions that had been lifted during the Clinton administration.In March 2006, the U.S. Department of Treasury accused a Swiss company of doing business with one of the sanctioned North Korean firms, and froze the assets of the Swiss company and its owner and banned U.S. entities from doing business with the firm or owner. In April 2006 the Department of Treasury issued an Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulation banning U.S. persons from owning or leasing North Korean-flagged vessels.On July 5, 2006, the DPRK test-launched an array of ballistic missiles, including a long-range Taepodong-2. The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1695 ten days later, although, as with the earlier short-range tests, the long range test broke no international laws. Even with the adoption of 1695, the Bush Administration did not immediately re-impose sanctions lifted by the Clinton administration in exchange for the moratorium.North Korea tested a nuclear device on October 9, 2006, after which the UN Security Council quickly adopted UN Resolution 1718 in response. In January 2007, the Bush administration re-imposed some of the sanctions lifted in the Clinton era, and published a list of luxury items prohibited for export to the DPRK, ushering in a sixth phase of sanctions.In the \\\"Initial Actions\\\" agreement signed by the Six Parties on February 13, 2007, the United States agreed to \\\"begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state sponsor of terrorism and advance the process of terminating the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to the DPRK. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":40013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North Korean Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North Korean Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.4.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.4.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

美国对朝制裁的历史可以分为六个阶段。从朝鲜战争时期到1989年,美国一直维持着相当全面的经济制裁,在此期间偶尔会增加限制的程度。在1989年至1995年期间,美国商业部门的货物出口仅被允许用于满足“基本人类需求”。在1994年谈判《框架协定》的同时,更广泛地放宽了制裁。2000年,克林顿总统放松了许多剩余的贸易和旅行制裁,作为对朝鲜1999年自愿停止导弹试验的回应。当时,大多数民用物品的许可证和贸易规定都大大放宽。尽管乔治·w·布什政府对朝鲜的态度与克林顿政府有很大不同,但在布什总统的第一个任期内,尽管有两家朝鲜公司被指从事大规模杀伤性武器和导弹扩散,但没有重新实施经济制裁(Rennack)。2005年3月,朝鲜宣布,因为“朝美关系”。作为暂停导弹试验的基础的美朝对话“在2001年布什政府上台时已经完全暂停”,朝鲜“目前不受暂停导弹发射的约束”。2005年5月1日和2006年3月8日,朝鲜分别进行了短程导弹试验。这些短程试验没有违反任何国际法,只引起了有限的公众关注和美国和国际社会的谴责,美国也没有重新实施经济制裁。相反,在第五阶段,美国政府把重点放在了金融制裁上,包括对涉嫌扩散大规模杀伤性武器的个别公司的资产进行制裁。2005年6月28日,美国冻结了美国管辖范围内被控参与大规模杀伤性武器扩散的三家朝鲜公司的资产,并于2005年10月又冻结了另外八家朝鲜公司(Rennack)的资产。2005年9月,美国财政部指定汇业银行为“主要洗钱银行”。这一行动,加上2005年12月财政部警告金融机构不要与朝鲜进行交易的咨询,证明对朝鲜开展业务的能力产生了相当大的影响,可能比克林顿政府期间取消的制裁产生了更大的影响。2006年3月,美国财政部指控一家瑞士公司与其中一家受制裁的朝鲜公司有业务往来,并冻结了该瑞士公司及其所有者的资产,并禁止美国实体与该公司或所有者有业务往来。2006年4月,美国财政部发布了一项外国资产控制办公室(OFAC)规定,禁止美国人拥有或租赁悬挂朝鲜国旗的船只。2006年7月5日,朝鲜试射了包括大浦洞2号远程弹道导弹在内的一系列弹道导弹。10天后,联合国安理会通过了第1695号决议,尽管与之前的短程试验一样,这次远程试验没有违反任何国际法。即使通过了1695号决议,布什政府也没有立即重新实施克林顿政府为换取暂停制裁而取消的制裁。2006年10月9日,朝鲜进行了一次核装置试验,联合国安理会迅速通过了联合国1718号决议作为回应。2007年1月,布什政府重新实施了克林顿时代取消的部分制裁,并公布了禁止向朝鲜出口的奢侈品清单,开启了第六阶段的制裁。在六方于2007年2月13日签署的“初步行动”协议中,美国同意“开始将朝鲜从支持恐怖主义国家的名单上除名,并推进终止对朝鲜适用《敌国贸易法》的进程”。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
U.S. Sanctions and Treasury Department Actions against North Korea from 1955 to October 2007
OverviewThe history of U.S. sanctions against the DPRK can be divided into six stages. The U.S. maintained fairly comprehensive economic sanctions from the time of the Korean War until 1989, occasionally increasing the level of restriction during this period. Between 1989 and 1995 the export of goods from the U.S. commercial sector was permitted solely for the purpose of meeting "basic human needs." A more extensive easing of sanctions accompanied the negotiation of the Agreed Framework in 1994.In 2000, President Clinton eased many remaining trade and travel sanctions in response to the DPRK's 1999 voluntary halt in missile testing. Licensing and trade regulations on most items for civilian use were significantly relaxed at this time.Although the George W. Bush administration's approach to the DPRK differed considerably from that of the Clinton administration, no economic sanctions were re-imposed during President Bush's first term, although two North Korean companies were cited for WMD and missile proliferation (Rennack).In March 2005, North Korea declared that because "the DPRK-U.S. dialogue" on which the missile test moratorium was based had been "totally suspended when the Bush administration took office in 2001," the DPRK is "not bound to the moratorium on the missile launch at present." The DPRK then tested short range missiles first on May 1, 2005, and again on March 8, 2006. These short range tests, which did not break any international laws, garnered only limited public attention and condemnation from the United States and international community, and no U.S. economic sanctions were re-imposed.Instead, in this fifth phase, the U.S. administration focused on financial sanc- tions, including the assets of individual companies suspected of proliferating weapons of mass destruction (WMD). On June 28, 2005, the United States froze the assets under U.S. jurisdiction of three DPRK firms that it accused of engaging in WMD proliferation, and in October 2005 froze the assets of an additional eight firms (Rennack).In September 2005 the U.S. Department of Treasury designated Banco Delta Asia as a bank of "primary money laundry concern." This action, coupled with a December 2005 Treasury Department advisory warning financial institutions against transactions with the DPRK, proved to have considerable impact on the DPRK's ability to do business, and may have had a greater impact than sanctions that had been lifted during the Clinton administration.In March 2006, the U.S. Department of Treasury accused a Swiss company of doing business with one of the sanctioned North Korean firms, and froze the assets of the Swiss company and its owner and banned U.S. entities from doing business with the firm or owner. In April 2006 the Department of Treasury issued an Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulation banning U.S. persons from owning or leasing North Korean-flagged vessels.On July 5, 2006, the DPRK test-launched an array of ballistic missiles, including a long-range Taepodong-2. The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1695 ten days later, although, as with the earlier short-range tests, the long range test broke no international laws. Even with the adoption of 1695, the Bush Administration did not immediately re-impose sanctions lifted by the Clinton administration in exchange for the moratorium.North Korea tested a nuclear device on October 9, 2006, after which the UN Security Council quickly adopted UN Resolution 1718 in response. In January 2007, the Bush administration re-imposed some of the sanctions lifted in the Clinton era, and published a list of luxury items prohibited for export to the DPRK, ushering in a sixth phase of sanctions.In the "Initial Actions" agreement signed by the Six Parties on February 13, 2007, the United States agreed to "begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state sponsor of terrorism and advance the process of terminating the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to the DPRK. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信