韩国中央和地方政府在南北合作中的作用

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Yongbum Choi
{"title":"韩国中央和地方政府在南北合作中的作用","authors":"Yongbum Choi","doi":"10.3172/NKR.4.1.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionIn 1948, two different governments were formed on the Korean Peninsula. Since then, South and North Korea have gone through the Korean War (1950-1953) and have maintained hostile relations for more than 55 years. The two Koreas' fierce arms race has turned the Korean Peninsula into the most heavily populated area with a military capacity. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern European communist countries in the early 1990s ended the Cold War order in most parts of the world. However, the Korean Peninsula is still locked in a Cold War of its own. The North's nuclear issues started in the early 1990s and surfaced again in 2002, thereby creating international tensions that have yet to be defused. Although there are realistic hopes for solving the North's nuclear issues through the denuclearization agreement of February 13, 2007, it is likely to take years for the United States and North Korea to resolve this standoff completely.Nevertheless, inter-Korean exchanges, especially those on some economic cooperative projects, such as the South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement signed on April 30, 2007, continue unabated (Kim and Moussawi, 2007). A new trend of inter- Korean exchange has been initiated at the South Korean local government level since June 2000, when the South Korean government issued the so-called \"Guidelines for Local Governments on Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation,\" a framework of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation for local government. To make it easier for local governments to engage in inter-Korean cooperation, South Korea abolished these guidelines in May 2003. Since then, only the Ministry of National Unification's approval is required for local governments' inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects. These inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects are being conducted by both high and low levels of local government.So, what has brought about these changes? First, a new globalization order caused by the end of the Cold War era called for fundamentally different national strategies from those that prevailed during the Cold War. In the early 1990s, South Korea established diplomatic relations with Russia and China, which used to be the major patrons of North Korea. In addition, the post-Cold War order prompted a reevaluation of the Korea-U.S. alliance.Second, in 1987, the amended constitution for a direct presidential election ended the military dictatorship in Korea and made it possible for the peaceful transition of power from the ruling party to the opposition party through elections (Snyder, 2004, pp. 23-24). Local governments obtained \"autonomy\" in 1995 for the first time, which enhanced their role not only with regard to their affairs, but also other areas such as inter-Korean relations. Finally, serious North Korean economic problems in the mid-1990s have created the kind of climate in which South Koreans should help their brotherly North Koreans through humanitarian aid and other inter-Korean projects.The last legacy of the Cold War still remains on the Korean Peninsula, despite the changes in domestic and international events. The coexistence of often conflicting trends has caused additional friction with regard to cooperation between the two Koreas. Some of this friction has to do with semantic problems such as \"mutual cooperation within the same race\" versus \"international cooperation.\" Beneath these conflicts and confusions, however, a specialty in inter-Korean relations does exist. Officially, the South and the North are different countries, with separate seats at the UN, but inter-Korean relations (at least in Koreans' perception) are characteristic of exchange within the same race. For example, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade handles the Six-Party Talks, which are designed to resolve North Korea's nuclear issue. On the other hand, the Ministry of Unification takes care of inter-Korean exchange issues. Within the government organizations, separate departments deal with the South-North issues, but local governments and NGOs focus on inter-Korean exchange and cooperation. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Roles of South Korean Central and Local Governments in Inter-Korean Cooperation\",\"authors\":\"Yongbum Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3172/NKR.4.1.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionIn 1948, two different governments were formed on the Korean Peninsula. Since then, South and North Korea have gone through the Korean War (1950-1953) and have maintained hostile relations for more than 55 years. The two Koreas' fierce arms race has turned the Korean Peninsula into the most heavily populated area with a military capacity. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern European communist countries in the early 1990s ended the Cold War order in most parts of the world. However, the Korean Peninsula is still locked in a Cold War of its own. The North's nuclear issues started in the early 1990s and surfaced again in 2002, thereby creating international tensions that have yet to be defused. Although there are realistic hopes for solving the North's nuclear issues through the denuclearization agreement of February 13, 2007, it is likely to take years for the United States and North Korea to resolve this standoff completely.Nevertheless, inter-Korean exchanges, especially those on some economic cooperative projects, such as the South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement signed on April 30, 2007, continue unabated (Kim and Moussawi, 2007). A new trend of inter- Korean exchange has been initiated at the South Korean local government level since June 2000, when the South Korean government issued the so-called \\\"Guidelines for Local Governments on Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation,\\\" a framework of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation for local government. To make it easier for local governments to engage in inter-Korean cooperation, South Korea abolished these guidelines in May 2003. Since then, only the Ministry of National Unification's approval is required for local governments' inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects. These inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects are being conducted by both high and low levels of local government.So, what has brought about these changes? First, a new globalization order caused by the end of the Cold War era called for fundamentally different national strategies from those that prevailed during the Cold War. In the early 1990s, South Korea established diplomatic relations with Russia and China, which used to be the major patrons of North Korea. In addition, the post-Cold War order prompted a reevaluation of the Korea-U.S. alliance.Second, in 1987, the amended constitution for a direct presidential election ended the military dictatorship in Korea and made it possible for the peaceful transition of power from the ruling party to the opposition party through elections (Snyder, 2004, pp. 23-24). Local governments obtained \\\"autonomy\\\" in 1995 for the first time, which enhanced their role not only with regard to their affairs, but also other areas such as inter-Korean relations. Finally, serious North Korean economic problems in the mid-1990s have created the kind of climate in which South Koreans should help their brotherly North Koreans through humanitarian aid and other inter-Korean projects.The last legacy of the Cold War still remains on the Korean Peninsula, despite the changes in domestic and international events. The coexistence of often conflicting trends has caused additional friction with regard to cooperation between the two Koreas. Some of this friction has to do with semantic problems such as \\\"mutual cooperation within the same race\\\" versus \\\"international cooperation.\\\" Beneath these conflicts and confusions, however, a specialty in inter-Korean relations does exist. Officially, the South and the North are different countries, with separate seats at the UN, but inter-Korean relations (at least in Koreans' perception) are characteristic of exchange within the same race. For example, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade handles the Six-Party Talks, which are designed to resolve North Korea's nuclear issue. On the other hand, the Ministry of Unification takes care of inter-Korean exchange issues. Within the government organizations, separate departments deal with the South-North issues, but local governments and NGOs focus on inter-Korean exchange and cooperation. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":40013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North Korean Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North Korean Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.4.1.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.4.1.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1948年,朝鲜半岛成立了两个不同的政府。此后,韩国和朝鲜经历了朝鲜战争(1950-1953),并保持了55年以上的敌对关系。韩朝之间激烈的军备竞赛使朝鲜半岛成为人口最密集、军事能力最强的地区。上世纪90年代初,苏联和东欧共产主义国家的解体结束了世界大部分地区的冷战秩序。然而,朝鲜半岛本身仍处于冷战状态。朝鲜的核问题始于上世纪90年代初,并于2002年再次浮出水面,从而造成了迄今尚未缓解的国际紧张局势。虽然通过2007年2月13日的无核化协议解决北韩核问题有现实的希望,但要彻底解决这一僵局,美国和北韩可能需要数年时间。但是,南北交流,特别是韩美等部分经济合作项目的交流,仍然处于停滞状态。2007年4月30日签署的自由贸易协定继续有增无减(Kim and Moussawi, 2007)。2000年6月,韩国政府发布了“地方自治团体交流合作纲要”,确立了地方自治团体之间的交流合作框架。此后,地方自治团体之间的交流开始出现新的趋势。为了让地方自治团体更容易参与南北合作,韩国于2003年5月废除了上述规定。此后,地方自治团体的南北交流合作事业只需要得到统一部的批准。南北交流合作项目是由地方自治团体和地方自治团体共同进行的。那么,是什么带来了这些变化呢?首先,冷战时代结束后形成的全球化新秩序要求各国采取与冷战时期完全不同的国家战略。上世纪90年代初,韩国与俄罗斯和中国建立了外交关系,这两个国家曾是朝鲜的主要资助国。此外,冷战后的秩序也促使人们重新评估韩美关系。联盟。其次,1987年修改的总统直选宪法结束了韩国的军事独裁统治,使执政党通过选举向反对党和平过渡成为可能(Snyder, 2004, pp. 23-24)。1995年,地方自治团体首次获得了“自治权”,不仅在地方事务上,在南北关系等其他领域,地方自治团体的作用也得到了加强。最后,20世纪90年代中期朝鲜严重的经济问题创造了一种氛围,即韩国应该通过人道主义援助和其他朝韩项目来帮助他们的兄弟朝鲜。尽管国内和国际形势发生了变化,但冷战的最后遗产仍然留在朝鲜半岛。经常相互冲突的趋势共存,在两个朝鲜之间的合作方面造成了更多的摩擦。其中一些摩擦与语义问题有关,例如“同一种族内的相互合作”与“国际合作”。然而,在这些矛盾和混乱之下,确实存在着南北关系的特殊性。官方上,韩国和朝鲜是不同的国家,在联合国拥有不同的席位,但朝韩关系(至少在韩国人的印象中)是同一种族内部交流的特征。例如,外交通商部负责旨在解决北韩核问题的六方会谈。另一方面,统一部负责南北交流问题。在政府机构中,南北事务由不同的部门负责,而地方自治团体和民间团体则主要负责南北交流合作。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Roles of South Korean Central and Local Governments in Inter-Korean Cooperation
IntroductionIn 1948, two different governments were formed on the Korean Peninsula. Since then, South and North Korea have gone through the Korean War (1950-1953) and have maintained hostile relations for more than 55 years. The two Koreas' fierce arms race has turned the Korean Peninsula into the most heavily populated area with a military capacity. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern European communist countries in the early 1990s ended the Cold War order in most parts of the world. However, the Korean Peninsula is still locked in a Cold War of its own. The North's nuclear issues started in the early 1990s and surfaced again in 2002, thereby creating international tensions that have yet to be defused. Although there are realistic hopes for solving the North's nuclear issues through the denuclearization agreement of February 13, 2007, it is likely to take years for the United States and North Korea to resolve this standoff completely.Nevertheless, inter-Korean exchanges, especially those on some economic cooperative projects, such as the South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement signed on April 30, 2007, continue unabated (Kim and Moussawi, 2007). A new trend of inter- Korean exchange has been initiated at the South Korean local government level since June 2000, when the South Korean government issued the so-called "Guidelines for Local Governments on Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation," a framework of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation for local government. To make it easier for local governments to engage in inter-Korean cooperation, South Korea abolished these guidelines in May 2003. Since then, only the Ministry of National Unification's approval is required for local governments' inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects. These inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects are being conducted by both high and low levels of local government.So, what has brought about these changes? First, a new globalization order caused by the end of the Cold War era called for fundamentally different national strategies from those that prevailed during the Cold War. In the early 1990s, South Korea established diplomatic relations with Russia and China, which used to be the major patrons of North Korea. In addition, the post-Cold War order prompted a reevaluation of the Korea-U.S. alliance.Second, in 1987, the amended constitution for a direct presidential election ended the military dictatorship in Korea and made it possible for the peaceful transition of power from the ruling party to the opposition party through elections (Snyder, 2004, pp. 23-24). Local governments obtained "autonomy" in 1995 for the first time, which enhanced their role not only with regard to their affairs, but also other areas such as inter-Korean relations. Finally, serious North Korean economic problems in the mid-1990s have created the kind of climate in which South Koreans should help their brotherly North Koreans through humanitarian aid and other inter-Korean projects.The last legacy of the Cold War still remains on the Korean Peninsula, despite the changes in domestic and international events. The coexistence of often conflicting trends has caused additional friction with regard to cooperation between the two Koreas. Some of this friction has to do with semantic problems such as "mutual cooperation within the same race" versus "international cooperation." Beneath these conflicts and confusions, however, a specialty in inter-Korean relations does exist. Officially, the South and the North are different countries, with separate seats at the UN, but inter-Korean relations (at least in Koreans' perception) are characteristic of exchange within the same race. For example, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade handles the Six-Party Talks, which are designed to resolve North Korea's nuclear issue. On the other hand, the Ministry of Unification takes care of inter-Korean exchange issues. Within the government organizations, separate departments deal with the South-North issues, but local governments and NGOs focus on inter-Korean exchange and cooperation. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信