萨伊纳河流域(非波兰北部)木矶鹬和木矶鹬春季迁徙觅食生态的差异

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Małgorzata Krupa, M. Ściborski, R. Krupa, Rafał Popis, Justyna Wołoszyn
{"title":"萨伊纳河流域(非波兰北部)木矶鹬和木矶鹬春季迁徙觅食生态的差异","authors":"Małgorzata Krupa, M. Ściborski, R. Krupa, Rafał Popis, Justyna Wołoszyn","doi":"10.34080/os.v19.22655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was conducted in 2002, in Sajna River valley (NE Poland). It was aimed at foraging ecology of two wader species not specialised in terms of feeding techniques. We found that while foraging on a stopover site during spring migration Ruffs used different ecological niche than Wood Sandpipers. Ruffs foraged significantly more often in medium and deep water and made also more medium and deep probes, what indicates preference in random probing. High intensity and proportionally low efficiency of foraging may confirm it. Contrary, Wood Sandpiper foraged less intensively but much more effectively; this, together with frequent changes of feeding places in terms of water level indicate that Wood Sandpiper to greater extent uses visual detection of prey than Ruff.","PeriodicalId":52418,"journal":{"name":"Ornis Svecica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in foraging ecology of Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola and Ruff Philomachus pugnax during spring migration in Sajna River valley (nor thern Poland)\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Krupa, M. Ściborski, R. Krupa, Rafał Popis, Justyna Wołoszyn\",\"doi\":\"10.34080/os.v19.22655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research was conducted in 2002, in Sajna River valley (NE Poland). It was aimed at foraging ecology of two wader species not specialised in terms of feeding techniques. We found that while foraging on a stopover site during spring migration Ruffs used different ecological niche than Wood Sandpipers. Ruffs foraged significantly more often in medium and deep water and made also more medium and deep probes, what indicates preference in random probing. High intensity and proportionally low efficiency of foraging may confirm it. Contrary, Wood Sandpiper foraged less intensively but much more effectively; this, together with frequent changes of feeding places in terms of water level indicate that Wood Sandpiper to greater extent uses visual detection of prey than Ruff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornis Svecica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornis Svecica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v19.22655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornis Svecica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v19.22655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是2002年在萨伊纳河谷(波兰东北部)进行的。它旨在研究两种涉水动物的觅食生态,而不是专门研究喂养技术。我们发现,在春季迁徙的中途停留地觅食时,颈羽鹬与木鹬使用不同的生态位。斑鸠在中深水和深水中觅食的频率明显更高,它们也会进行更多的中深水探测,这表明它们更喜欢随机探测。高强度和比例低效率的觅食可以证实这一点。相反,木矶鹬的觅食强度较低,但觅食效率更高;这一点,再加上觅食地点在水位方面的频繁变化,表明木矶鹬比鲁夫更多地使用视觉探测猎物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in foraging ecology of Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola and Ruff Philomachus pugnax during spring migration in Sajna River valley (nor thern Poland)
The research was conducted in 2002, in Sajna River valley (NE Poland). It was aimed at foraging ecology of two wader species not specialised in terms of feeding techniques. We found that while foraging on a stopover site during spring migration Ruffs used different ecological niche than Wood Sandpipers. Ruffs foraged significantly more often in medium and deep water and made also more medium and deep probes, what indicates preference in random probing. High intensity and proportionally low efficiency of foraging may confirm it. Contrary, Wood Sandpiper foraged less intensively but much more effectively; this, together with frequent changes of feeding places in terms of water level indicate that Wood Sandpiper to greater extent uses visual detection of prey than Ruff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ornis Svecica
Ornis Svecica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信