家蚕种群繁殖生物学的第一、第二和替代巢

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
A. Enemar
{"title":"家蚕种群繁殖生物学的第一、第二和替代巢","authors":"A. Enemar","doi":"10.34080/os.v19.23118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The breeding behaviour of a Treecreeper population that bred in nest pockets and in which all females were colour-ringed was followed over ten seasons. On average, 50% of the first breeding attempts in spring failed. Between half and two thirds of the successful females were double-brooded. The remaining females were single- brooded. These two breeding categories were identical in terms of initial clutch size and egg volume. The double-brooded females invested less in their second than their first clutch. Most of the females that failed laid replacement clutches of similar size as in the first attempt but with larger eggs. A replacement brood where young successfully fledged was never followed by a second breeding attempt. The average distance between the first and the repeat nest was the same for double-brooded and replacement-breeding females. The egg volumes of the first and the repeat clutches were strongly correlated. The double-brooded pairs were the most common breeding category and reared 50% of the population’s total output of fledged broods, while the single-brooded and replacement breeding pairs each fledged ca. 25%. The adaptive values of the three breeding categories are compared.","PeriodicalId":52418,"journal":{"name":"Ornis Svecica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First, second and replacement broods in the breeding biology of a Treecreeper Certhia familiaris population\",\"authors\":\"A. Enemar\",\"doi\":\"10.34080/os.v19.23118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The breeding behaviour of a Treecreeper population that bred in nest pockets and in which all females were colour-ringed was followed over ten seasons. On average, 50% of the first breeding attempts in spring failed. Between half and two thirds of the successful females were double-brooded. The remaining females were single- brooded. These two breeding categories were identical in terms of initial clutch size and egg volume. The double-brooded females invested less in their second than their first clutch. Most of the females that failed laid replacement clutches of similar size as in the first attempt but with larger eggs. A replacement brood where young successfully fledged was never followed by a second breeding attempt. The average distance between the first and the repeat nest was the same for double-brooded and replacement-breeding females. The egg volumes of the first and the repeat clutches were strongly correlated. The double-brooded pairs were the most common breeding category and reared 50% of the population’s total output of fledged broods, while the single-brooded and replacement breeding pairs each fledged ca. 25%. The adaptive values of the three breeding categories are compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornis Svecica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornis Svecica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v19.23118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornis Svecica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v19.23118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究人员对一个在巢穴中繁殖、所有雌性都有彩色圈的树蛉种群的繁殖行为进行了10个季节的跟踪研究。在春季,平均50%的第一次繁殖尝试都失败了。一半到三分之二的成功雌鸟是双育的。其余的雌性都是单卵的。这两种繁殖类别在初始卵数和卵量方面是相同的。双卵雌性在第二窝的投入比第一窝要少。大多数失败的雌鸟产下的后代和第一次尝试时差不多大,但卵更大。雏鸟成功羽化后的替代雏鸟不会再进行第二次繁殖。双育和代育雌性的第一个巢与重复巢之间的平均距离相同。第一窝和重复窝的卵量呈强相关。双育对是最常见的繁殖类型,占种群羽羽总产出的50%,而单育和替代繁殖对各占25%。比较了三种育种类别的适应值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First, second and replacement broods in the breeding biology of a Treecreeper Certhia familiaris population
The breeding behaviour of a Treecreeper population that bred in nest pockets and in which all females were colour-ringed was followed over ten seasons. On average, 50% of the first breeding attempts in spring failed. Between half and two thirds of the successful females were double-brooded. The remaining females were single- brooded. These two breeding categories were identical in terms of initial clutch size and egg volume. The double-brooded females invested less in their second than their first clutch. Most of the females that failed laid replacement clutches of similar size as in the first attempt but with larger eggs. A replacement brood where young successfully fledged was never followed by a second breeding attempt. The average distance between the first and the repeat nest was the same for double-brooded and replacement-breeding females. The egg volumes of the first and the repeat clutches were strongly correlated. The double-brooded pairs were the most common breeding category and reared 50% of the population’s total output of fledged broods, while the single-brooded and replacement breeding pairs each fledged ca. 25%. The adaptive values of the three breeding categories are compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ornis Svecica
Ornis Svecica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信