腹腔镜与机器人远端胰腺切除术:综述

IF 0.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
D. Coco, S. Leanza
{"title":"腹腔镜与机器人远端胰腺切除术:综述","authors":"D. Coco, S. Leanza","doi":"10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of meta-analytic review that compared Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy (LDP) versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach. The studies comparison showed no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU stay, conversion rate, pancreatic fistula,morbidity and mortality rate between the LPD group and the RDP group.","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: review\",\"authors\":\"D. Coco, S. Leanza\",\"doi\":\"10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of meta-analytic review that compared Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy (LDP) versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach. The studies comparison showed no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU stay, conversion rate, pancreatic fistula,morbidity and mortality rate between the LPD group and the RDP group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pancreas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pancreas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1590-8577.21.S5.06-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项荟萃分析综述比较了腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)与机器人远端胰腺切除术(RDP)的结果,证明了机器人方法的安全性和可行性。研究比较显示,LPD组与RDP组在术后并发症、30天死亡率、ICU住院时间、转换率、胰瘘、发病率和死亡率方面均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: review
The results of meta-analytic review that compared Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy (LDP) versus Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach. The studies comparison showed no differences in postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, ICU stay, conversion rate, pancreatic fistula,morbidity and mortality rate between the LPD group and the RDP group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Pancreas
Journal of the Pancreas GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信