{"title":"政策评估中表征患者行为的轨迹匹配","authors":"Chaohsin Lin, Shuofen Hsu, Yu-Hua Yan","doi":"10.33790/jphip1100174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Economic theory and earlier empirical evidence suggest that patients will use fewer health services when they have to pay more for them. However, that copayment had little or no effect on visits to physicians. Objectives: This study exploits a natural experiment in Taiwan to estimate the effect of an increase in copayment on the demand for physician services and prescription drugs across the different dimensions of age, illness severity and patient behavior. Methods: Data were taken from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI) in Taiwan for the period of 1998 to 2000 and contained enrollment and claims files from a randomly chosen 0.2% of Taiwan’s population. The deletion of observations with missing values for any of the dependent or independent variables resulted in a final sample size of 69 768 individuals. The basic empirical strategy is to pool the data over the two years in question and estimate the effects of the reform by comparing the expected number of visits before and after the reform. We explored several alternatives stratifying the treatment in order to improve the quality of the identification. Results: We found that the reduction in visits was rather conservative with the DD estimates ranging from -0.08 to -0.17 compared to the estimate of -0.38 without stratification. The reform effect will most likely be exaggerated if the unobserved heterogeneity of the individual, such as health status and behavior, is not considered in the model.","PeriodicalId":92810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health issues and practices","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectories Matching for Characterizing Patient’s Behavior in Policy Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Chaohsin Lin, Shuofen Hsu, Yu-Hua Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.33790/jphip1100174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Economic theory and earlier empirical evidence suggest that patients will use fewer health services when they have to pay more for them. However, that copayment had little or no effect on visits to physicians. Objectives: This study exploits a natural experiment in Taiwan to estimate the effect of an increase in copayment on the demand for physician services and prescription drugs across the different dimensions of age, illness severity and patient behavior. Methods: Data were taken from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI) in Taiwan for the period of 1998 to 2000 and contained enrollment and claims files from a randomly chosen 0.2% of Taiwan’s population. The deletion of observations with missing values for any of the dependent or independent variables resulted in a final sample size of 69 768 individuals. The basic empirical strategy is to pool the data over the two years in question and estimate the effects of the reform by comparing the expected number of visits before and after the reform. We explored several alternatives stratifying the treatment in order to improve the quality of the identification. Results: We found that the reduction in visits was rather conservative with the DD estimates ranging from -0.08 to -0.17 compared to the estimate of -0.38 without stratification. The reform effect will most likely be exaggerated if the unobserved heterogeneity of the individual, such as health status and behavior, is not considered in the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health issues and practices\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health issues and practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33790/jphip1100174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health issues and practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33790/jphip1100174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trajectories Matching for Characterizing Patient’s Behavior in Policy Evaluation
Background: Economic theory and earlier empirical evidence suggest that patients will use fewer health services when they have to pay more for them. However, that copayment had little or no effect on visits to physicians. Objectives: This study exploits a natural experiment in Taiwan to estimate the effect of an increase in copayment on the demand for physician services and prescription drugs across the different dimensions of age, illness severity and patient behavior. Methods: Data were taken from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI) in Taiwan for the period of 1998 to 2000 and contained enrollment and claims files from a randomly chosen 0.2% of Taiwan’s population. The deletion of observations with missing values for any of the dependent or independent variables resulted in a final sample size of 69 768 individuals. The basic empirical strategy is to pool the data over the two years in question and estimate the effects of the reform by comparing the expected number of visits before and after the reform. We explored several alternatives stratifying the treatment in order to improve the quality of the identification. Results: We found that the reduction in visits was rather conservative with the DD estimates ranging from -0.08 to -0.17 compared to the estimate of -0.38 without stratification. The reform effect will most likely be exaggerated if the unobserved heterogeneity of the individual, such as health status and behavior, is not considered in the model.