Mehmet Eflatun Deniz, H. Erçil, Ergun Alma, Erbay Tümer, Umut Ünal, A. Altunkol, Z. G. Gürbüz
{"title":"血液中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞分布在前列腺癌诊断中的作用","authors":"Mehmet Eflatun Deniz, H. Erçil, Ergun Alma, Erbay Tümer, Umut Ünal, A. Altunkol, Z. G. Gürbüz","doi":"10.33719/YUD.525738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a recently popular diagnostic marker. We sought answers to questions such as whether this marker has a role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, any cut off value can be calculated, compared to platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and it has a relationship with Gleason score and percentage of tumors detected in biopsy cores. In addition, we aimed to share the findings of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. Materials and Methods : The results of 679 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy with prostate specific antigen (PSA) values above 2.5 ng / ml in our clinic between August 2014 and February 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were between 2.5-3.9 ng / ml (Group 1), 4-9.9 ng / ml (Group 2), 10-19.9 ng / ml (Group 3), 20 ng / ml and above (Group 4) according to PSA values, divided into four groups. The diagnostic value of NLR was evaluated in these groups. Results: NLR was found as a diagnostic marker in groups 2,3 and 4. The cut off value was calculated as 2.5. It had similar diagnostic power as PLR. There was a poor correlation with Gleason score and percentage of tumor in cores. It was not important in predicting bone metastasis. The difference between PSA density and DRE was statistically significant in groups with pathologic prostate cancer (PCa) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Conclusion: Although NLR is not very strong in the diagnosis of PCa, it has a diagnostic value. It can be used as a marker to support PSA.","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"15 1","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role Of Blood Neutrophil / Lymphocyte Distribution in The Diagnosis Of Prostate Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Eflatun Deniz, H. Erçil, Ergun Alma, Erbay Tümer, Umut Ünal, A. Altunkol, Z. G. Gürbüz\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/YUD.525738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a recently popular diagnostic marker. We sought answers to questions such as whether this marker has a role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, any cut off value can be calculated, compared to platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and it has a relationship with Gleason score and percentage of tumors detected in biopsy cores. In addition, we aimed to share the findings of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. Materials and Methods : The results of 679 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy with prostate specific antigen (PSA) values above 2.5 ng / ml in our clinic between August 2014 and February 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were between 2.5-3.9 ng / ml (Group 1), 4-9.9 ng / ml (Group 2), 10-19.9 ng / ml (Group 3), 20 ng / ml and above (Group 4) according to PSA values, divided into four groups. The diagnostic value of NLR was evaluated in these groups. Results: NLR was found as a diagnostic marker in groups 2,3 and 4. The cut off value was calculated as 2.5. It had similar diagnostic power as PLR. There was a poor correlation with Gleason score and percentage of tumor in cores. It was not important in predicting bone metastasis. The difference between PSA density and DRE was statistically significant in groups with pathologic prostate cancer (PCa) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Conclusion: Although NLR is not very strong in the diagnosis of PCa, it has a diagnostic value. It can be used as a marker to support PSA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"66-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/YUD.525738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/YUD.525738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是近年来流行的一种诊断指标。我们寻求诸如该标志物是否在前列腺癌的诊断中起作用,与血小板淋巴细胞比率(PLR)相比,任何切断值都可以计算,它与Gleason评分和活检核中检测到的肿瘤百分比有关等问题的答案。此外,我们旨在分享经直肠超声(TRUS)引导活检患者的发现。材料与方法:回顾性分析2014年8月至2017年2月我院679例前列腺特异抗原(PSA)高于2.5 ng / ml的超声引导下前列腺活检患者的结果。患者根据PSA值在2.5 ~ 3.9 ng / ml(第1组)、4 ~ 9.9 ng / ml(第2组)、10 ~ 19.9 ng / ml(第3组)、20 ng / ml及以上(第4组),分为4组。评价两组NLR的诊断价值。结果:2、3、4组均发现NLR为诊断标志物。截止值计算为2.5。它具有与PLR相似的诊断能力。与Gleason评分和核心肿瘤百分比相关性较差。对预测骨转移不重要。病理前列腺癌(PCa)组和良性前列腺增生(BPH)组PSA密度和DRE差异有统计学意义。结论:NLR对前列腺癌的诊断作用虽不是很强,但具有一定的诊断价值。它可以作为支持PSA的标志物。
The Role Of Blood Neutrophil / Lymphocyte Distribution in The Diagnosis Of Prostate Cancer
Objective: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a recently popular diagnostic marker. We sought answers to questions such as whether this marker has a role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, any cut off value can be calculated, compared to platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and it has a relationship with Gleason score and percentage of tumors detected in biopsy cores. In addition, we aimed to share the findings of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. Materials and Methods : The results of 679 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy with prostate specific antigen (PSA) values above 2.5 ng / ml in our clinic between August 2014 and February 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were between 2.5-3.9 ng / ml (Group 1), 4-9.9 ng / ml (Group 2), 10-19.9 ng / ml (Group 3), 20 ng / ml and above (Group 4) according to PSA values, divided into four groups. The diagnostic value of NLR was evaluated in these groups. Results: NLR was found as a diagnostic marker in groups 2,3 and 4. The cut off value was calculated as 2.5. It had similar diagnostic power as PLR. There was a poor correlation with Gleason score and percentage of tumor in cores. It was not important in predicting bone metastasis. The difference between PSA density and DRE was statistically significant in groups with pathologic prostate cancer (PCa) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Conclusion: Although NLR is not very strong in the diagnosis of PCa, it has a diagnostic value. It can be used as a marker to support PSA.