急诊医师对急性肾绞痛患者的处理方法

Ö. Bozan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, Mehmet Muzaffer Islam
{"title":"急诊医师对急性肾绞痛患者的处理方法","authors":"Ö. Bozan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, Mehmet Muzaffer Islam","doi":"10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-1016256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was conducted to describe the current diagnosis and treatment strategies of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with acute renal colic. Material and Methods: In this study, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was administered to emergency medicine physicians. In addition to the participants’ demographic data, such as age and gender, years of experience in the emergency medicine department, and whether they were a specialist or resident, the survey also inquired about their choices of imaging methods, laboratory tests, analgesic medications, and intravenous fluids, and tendency to refer patients to a urologist for a consultation. Results: The median age of the 108 volunteers participating in the study was calculated as 31 (27 - 34.8) years and their years of experience as 4 (2-8) years. More than half (60.2%, n=65) of the participants were emergency medicine residents, while the remaining 39.8% (n=43) were emergency medicine specialists. The emergency medicine specialists and residents were compared in terms of the variables related to their approaches to patients presenting to the emergency department with a preliminary diagnosis of renal colic. The first choice of analgesic drugs was dichotomised as diclofenac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with 34 (79.1%) of the specialists and 60 (92.3%) of the residents reporting diclofenac as their first choice, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: In this study, the emergency medicine residents preferred diclofenac more than the emergency medicine specialists in primary care, although they had similar renal colic imaging methods preferences. Keywords: Acute renal colic, emergency medicine, kidney stone.","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The approach of emergency physicians to patients with acute renal colic\",\"authors\":\"Ö. Bozan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, Mehmet Muzaffer Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-1016256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study was conducted to describe the current diagnosis and treatment strategies of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with acute renal colic. Material and Methods: In this study, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was administered to emergency medicine physicians. In addition to the participants’ demographic data, such as age and gender, years of experience in the emergency medicine department, and whether they were a specialist or resident, the survey also inquired about their choices of imaging methods, laboratory tests, analgesic medications, and intravenous fluids, and tendency to refer patients to a urologist for a consultation. Results: The median age of the 108 volunteers participating in the study was calculated as 31 (27 - 34.8) years and their years of experience as 4 (2-8) years. More than half (60.2%, n=65) of the participants were emergency medicine residents, while the remaining 39.8% (n=43) were emergency medicine specialists. The emergency medicine specialists and residents were compared in terms of the variables related to their approaches to patients presenting to the emergency department with a preliminary diagnosis of renal colic. The first choice of analgesic drugs was dichotomised as diclofenac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with 34 (79.1%) of the specialists and 60 (92.3%) of the residents reporting diclofenac as their first choice, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: In this study, the emergency medicine residents preferred diclofenac more than the emergency medicine specialists in primary care, although they had similar renal colic imaging methods preferences. Keywords: Acute renal colic, emergency medicine, kidney stone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-1016256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-1016256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨急诊科收治的急性肾绞痛患者的诊治现状。材料与方法:在本研究中,对急诊医师进行了基于互联网的横断面调查。除了参与者的人口统计数据,如年龄和性别,在急诊科的工作年限,以及他们是专科医生还是住院医生,调查还询问了他们对成像方法、实验室检查、镇痛药物和静脉输液的选择,以及将患者转介给泌尿科医生咨询的倾向。结果:108名志愿者的年龄中位数为31(27 - 34.8)岁,经验年数为4(2-8)岁。超过一半(60.2%,n=65)的参与者是急诊医学住院医师,其余39.8% (n=43)的参与者是急诊医学专家。我们比较了急诊医学专家和住院医师在处理初步诊断为肾绞痛的急诊科患者的方法方面的变量。首选镇痛药分为双氯芬酸和其他非甾体类抗炎药,34名专科医生(79.1%)和60名住院医生(92.3%)报告双氯芬酸为首选镇痛药,两组差异有统计学意义。结论:在本研究中,尽管急诊内科住院医师对肾绞痛成像方法的偏好相似,但在初级保健中,他们比急诊内科专家更喜欢双氯芬酸。关键词:急性肾绞痛,急诊医学,肾结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The approach of emergency physicians to patients with acute renal colic
Objective: This study was conducted to describe the current diagnosis and treatment strategies of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with acute renal colic. Material and Methods: In this study, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was administered to emergency medicine physicians. In addition to the participants’ demographic data, such as age and gender, years of experience in the emergency medicine department, and whether they were a specialist or resident, the survey also inquired about their choices of imaging methods, laboratory tests, analgesic medications, and intravenous fluids, and tendency to refer patients to a urologist for a consultation. Results: The median age of the 108 volunteers participating in the study was calculated as 31 (27 - 34.8) years and their years of experience as 4 (2-8) years. More than half (60.2%, n=65) of the participants were emergency medicine residents, while the remaining 39.8% (n=43) were emergency medicine specialists. The emergency medicine specialists and residents were compared in terms of the variables related to their approaches to patients presenting to the emergency department with a preliminary diagnosis of renal colic. The first choice of analgesic drugs was dichotomised as diclofenac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with 34 (79.1%) of the specialists and 60 (92.3%) of the residents reporting diclofenac as their first choice, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: In this study, the emergency medicine residents preferred diclofenac more than the emergency medicine specialists in primary care, although they had similar renal colic imaging methods preferences. Keywords: Acute renal colic, emergency medicine, kidney stone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信