菲律宾耳鼻喉科-头颈外科住院医师培训项目的自我报告评估

Maria Natividad Almazan
{"title":"菲律宾耳鼻喉科-头颈外科住院医师培训项目的自我报告评估","authors":"Maria Natividad Almazan","doi":"10.32412/PJOHNS.V36I1.1651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the self-reported assessment of initial implementation of the 3 domains of Outcome-Based Education in accredited Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery residency training programs in the Philippines by consultants and residents and explore any associations between their demographic profiles and assessments. Methods: Design: Mixed Method Research Design Setting: Multicenter 30 accredited ORL-HNS residency training institutions in the PhilippinesNational Capital Region (NCR) 19, Luzon 7, Visayas 2, and Mindanao 2. Participants: A total of 129 consultants and 82 second to fourth year residents in training were included in the study by convenience sampling. First-year residents who started their residency training in January 2020 were excluded. Respondents answered self-reported questionnaires to assess implementation of the 3 domains of OBE: intended learning outcomes (ILO), teaching and learning activities (TLA) and assessment tasks (AT) using the 4-point scale score from “fully implemented” (4) to “not implemented” (1). Results of questionnaires were confirmed using open-ended questions on the challenges of OBE with a focused group discussion among 4 consultants and 1 resident. Results: The self-reported assessment of respondents on OBE implementation was “fully implemented” in the 3 domains. However, low numerical scores were seen for “managing community health and social need” in the ILO and “laboratory activities and workshops” in the TLA for both consultants and residents, in the assessment task (AT “multisource feedback by nurses and administrative staff” for the consultants, and “direct observation of performance skills for patient encounter” for residents. Among the 7 modules, “research methodology” had the lowest score for both consultants’ and residents’ self-perception. Challenges of OBE revealed included “mastery,” “time” and “data keeping.” Consultants younger than 60 years of age who had been in the department longer than 3 years and residents who attended an OBE workshop / lecture tended to give higher scores. Conclusion: Two years after distribution of the manual on OBE to ORL-HNS residency training institutions, the consultants’ and residents’ self-reported assessment on implementation in all the 3 domains of OBE was “fully implemented.”","PeriodicalId":33358,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Reported Assessment of Outcome-Based Education in Philippine Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Residency Training Programs by Consultants and Residents\",\"authors\":\"Maria Natividad Almazan\",\"doi\":\"10.32412/PJOHNS.V36I1.1651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine the self-reported assessment of initial implementation of the 3 domains of Outcome-Based Education in accredited Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery residency training programs in the Philippines by consultants and residents and explore any associations between their demographic profiles and assessments. Methods: Design: Mixed Method Research Design Setting: Multicenter 30 accredited ORL-HNS residency training institutions in the PhilippinesNational Capital Region (NCR) 19, Luzon 7, Visayas 2, and Mindanao 2. Participants: A total of 129 consultants and 82 second to fourth year residents in training were included in the study by convenience sampling. First-year residents who started their residency training in January 2020 were excluded. Respondents answered self-reported questionnaires to assess implementation of the 3 domains of OBE: intended learning outcomes (ILO), teaching and learning activities (TLA) and assessment tasks (AT) using the 4-point scale score from “fully implemented” (4) to “not implemented” (1). Results of questionnaires were confirmed using open-ended questions on the challenges of OBE with a focused group discussion among 4 consultants and 1 resident. Results: The self-reported assessment of respondents on OBE implementation was “fully implemented” in the 3 domains. However, low numerical scores were seen for “managing community health and social need” in the ILO and “laboratory activities and workshops” in the TLA for both consultants and residents, in the assessment task (AT “multisource feedback by nurses and administrative staff” for the consultants, and “direct observation of performance skills for patient encounter” for residents. Among the 7 modules, “research methodology” had the lowest score for both consultants’ and residents’ self-perception. Challenges of OBE revealed included “mastery,” “time” and “data keeping.” Consultants younger than 60 years of age who had been in the department longer than 3 years and residents who attended an OBE workshop / lecture tended to give higher scores. Conclusion: Two years after distribution of the manual on OBE to ORL-HNS residency training institutions, the consultants’ and residents’ self-reported assessment on implementation in all the 3 domains of OBE was “fully implemented.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":33358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32412/PJOHNS.V36I1.1651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32412/PJOHNS.V36I1.1651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在菲律宾经认可的耳鼻喉头颈外科住院医师培训项目中,咨询师和住院医师对初步实施基于结果的教育的3个领域的自我报告评估,并探讨其人口统计资料与评估之间的任何关联。设计:混合方法研究设计环境:在菲律宾国家首都地区(NCR) 19、吕宋岛7、米沙鄢群岛2和棉兰老岛2,多中心30个认可的ORL-HNS住院医师培训机构。参与者:采用方便抽样的方法,共纳入129名咨询师和82名二至四年级实习住院医师。2020年1月开始住院医师培训的第一年住院医师被排除在外。受访者回答了自我报告的问卷,以评估OBE的三个领域的实施情况:预期学习成果(ILO),教学和学习活动(TLA)和评估任务(AT),使用从“完全实施”(4)到“未实施”(1)的4分制评分。问卷结果通过4名顾问和1名居民的焦点小组讨论,使用关于OBE挑战的开放式问题进行确认。结果:被调查者自我报告的OBE实施评估在3个领域“完全实施”。然而,在劳工组织的"管理社区卫生和社会需要"和在咨询师和住院医师的"实验室活动和讲习班"中,在评估任务(AT)中,对咨询师的"护士和行政人员的多来源反馈"和对住院医师的"直接观察与病人接触的绩效技能"中,数字得分较低。在7个模块中,“研究方法”对咨询师和住院医师的自我认知得分最低。OBE面临的挑战包括“精通”、“时间”和“数据保存”。年龄小于60岁、在本科工作超过3年的咨询师和参加过OBE研讨会/讲座的住院医师往往得分较高。结论:在向ORL-HNS住院医师培训机构发放OBE手册两年后,咨询师和住院医师在OBE 3个领域的实施情况自我报告评估“全面实施”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-Reported Assessment of Outcome-Based Education in Philippine Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Residency Training Programs by Consultants and Residents
Objective: To determine the self-reported assessment of initial implementation of the 3 domains of Outcome-Based Education in accredited Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery residency training programs in the Philippines by consultants and residents and explore any associations between their demographic profiles and assessments. Methods: Design: Mixed Method Research Design Setting: Multicenter 30 accredited ORL-HNS residency training institutions in the PhilippinesNational Capital Region (NCR) 19, Luzon 7, Visayas 2, and Mindanao 2. Participants: A total of 129 consultants and 82 second to fourth year residents in training were included in the study by convenience sampling. First-year residents who started their residency training in January 2020 were excluded. Respondents answered self-reported questionnaires to assess implementation of the 3 domains of OBE: intended learning outcomes (ILO), teaching and learning activities (TLA) and assessment tasks (AT) using the 4-point scale score from “fully implemented” (4) to “not implemented” (1). Results of questionnaires were confirmed using open-ended questions on the challenges of OBE with a focused group discussion among 4 consultants and 1 resident. Results: The self-reported assessment of respondents on OBE implementation was “fully implemented” in the 3 domains. However, low numerical scores were seen for “managing community health and social need” in the ILO and “laboratory activities and workshops” in the TLA for both consultants and residents, in the assessment task (AT “multisource feedback by nurses and administrative staff” for the consultants, and “direct observation of performance skills for patient encounter” for residents. Among the 7 modules, “research methodology” had the lowest score for both consultants’ and residents’ self-perception. Challenges of OBE revealed included “mastery,” “time” and “data keeping.” Consultants younger than 60 years of age who had been in the department longer than 3 years and residents who attended an OBE workshop / lecture tended to give higher scores. Conclusion: Two years after distribution of the manual on OBE to ORL-HNS residency training institutions, the consultants’ and residents’ self-reported assessment on implementation in all the 3 domains of OBE was “fully implemented.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信