全球大学声誉和排名:来自文化经济学的见解

K. Stergiou, Athanassios C. Tsikliras
{"title":"全球大学声誉和排名:来自文化经济学的见解","authors":"K. Stergiou, Athanassios C. Tsikliras","doi":"10.3354/ESEP00140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we used culturomics (i.e. analysis of large electronic datasets for the study of human culture) in order to study the use of the names of various universities in the digi- tized corpus of English books. In particular, we used the Google Ngram viewer (available online: http://books.google.com/ngrams) to produce the frequencies of the names of 13 US, 5 UK and 4 Canadian universities in the English books and examined how these frequencies changed with time (1800 to 2008). We further used these frequencies to establish reputation rankings for these universities. Our results showed that Ngram is an easy-and-cheap-to-apply tool to approximate the reputation and 'intellectual' impact of universities over long time periods. Its reputation- generating capability, at least for top universities, is not worse than the within- and between- system capabilities of commercial tools (i.e. QS, THE and THE World Reputation Rankings). Ngram can, thus, be promising at least for students (and their families), who make choices that are affected by rankings, providing them with additional benefits (e.g. perception of the historical impact of a university) when compared to the short-term, volatile annual commercial rankings.","PeriodicalId":40001,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","volume":"13 1","pages":"193-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global university reputation and rankings: insights from culturomics\",\"authors\":\"K. Stergiou, Athanassios C. Tsikliras\",\"doi\":\"10.3354/ESEP00140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we used culturomics (i.e. analysis of large electronic datasets for the study of human culture) in order to study the use of the names of various universities in the digi- tized corpus of English books. In particular, we used the Google Ngram viewer (available online: http://books.google.com/ngrams) to produce the frequencies of the names of 13 US, 5 UK and 4 Canadian universities in the English books and examined how these frequencies changed with time (1800 to 2008). We further used these frequencies to establish reputation rankings for these universities. Our results showed that Ngram is an easy-and-cheap-to-apply tool to approximate the reputation and 'intellectual' impact of universities over long time periods. Its reputation- generating capability, at least for top universities, is not worse than the within- and between- system capabilities of commercial tools (i.e. QS, THE and THE World Reputation Rankings). Ngram can, thus, be promising at least for students (and their families), who make choices that are affected by rankings, providing them with additional benefits (e.g. perception of the historical impact of a university) when compared to the short-term, volatile annual commercial rankings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"193-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

在这项研究中,我们使用文化组学(即对人类文化研究的大型电子数据集进行分析)来研究数字化英语图书语料库中不同大学名称的使用情况。特别是,我们使用谷歌Ngram查看器(可在线获取:http://books.google.com/ngrams)生成了英文书中13所美国、5所英国和4所加拿大大学的名称的频率,并检查了这些频率如何随时间变化(1800年至2008年)。我们进一步利用这些频率为这些大学建立声誉排名。我们的研究结果表明,Ngram是一种简单而廉价的工具,可以用来估算大学长期以来的声誉和“智力”影响。它的声誉创造能力,至少对顶尖大学来说,并不比商业工具(即QS、the和the世界声誉排名)在系统内部和系统之间的能力差。因此,Ngram至少对学生(及其家庭)来说是有希望的,因为他们的选择会受到排名的影响,与短期的、不稳定的年度商业排名相比,Ngram为他们提供了额外的好处(例如,对大学历史影响的认知)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global university reputation and rankings: insights from culturomics
In this study, we used culturomics (i.e. analysis of large electronic datasets for the study of human culture) in order to study the use of the names of various universities in the digi- tized corpus of English books. In particular, we used the Google Ngram viewer (available online: http://books.google.com/ngrams) to produce the frequencies of the names of 13 US, 5 UK and 4 Canadian universities in the English books and examined how these frequencies changed with time (1800 to 2008). We further used these frequencies to establish reputation rankings for these universities. Our results showed that Ngram is an easy-and-cheap-to-apply tool to approximate the reputation and 'intellectual' impact of universities over long time periods. Its reputation- generating capability, at least for top universities, is not worse than the within- and between- system capabilities of commercial tools (i.e. QS, THE and THE World Reputation Rankings). Ngram can, thus, be promising at least for students (and their families), who make choices that are affected by rankings, providing them with additional benefits (e.g. perception of the historical impact of a university) when compared to the short-term, volatile annual commercial rankings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: •provides a global stage for presenting, discussing and developing issues concerning ethics in science, environmental politics, and ecological and economic ethics •publishes accepted manuscripts rapidly •guarantees immediate world-wide visibility •is edited and produced by an experienced team
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信