二语提取:动词是否都一样?

Irina Stoica
{"title":"二语提取:动词是否都一样?","authors":"Irina Stoica","doi":"10.31178/bwpl.24.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Factive verbs are traditionally said to induce weak island effects, banning the extraction of adjuncts, but not that of arguments, out of their post-verbal clause. However, many studies in the literature (Karttunen 1971, Hooper & Thompson 1973, Djarv 2019) show that not all factive verbs are alike and distinguish between emotive factives (true factives) and cognitive factives (semi-factives). These two sub-classes evince different syntactic behaviour, cognitive factives being seen as more permissive. With such verbs, event adjunct extraction is reported to be allowed, in some cases (Djarv & Romero 2021). The aim of this paper is to test the availability of adjunct extraction in L2 English. Testing native speakers of Romanian, at an intermediate and advanced level of English, I show that the extraction of adjuncts out of the post-verbal clause of a factive verb is banned in L2, irrespective of predicate type or level of proficiency. \"","PeriodicalId":30451,"journal":{"name":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraction in L2 English:Are factive verbs all alike?\",\"authors\":\"Irina Stoica\",\"doi\":\"10.31178/bwpl.24.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Factive verbs are traditionally said to induce weak island effects, banning the extraction of adjuncts, but not that of arguments, out of their post-verbal clause. However, many studies in the literature (Karttunen 1971, Hooper & Thompson 1973, Djarv 2019) show that not all factive verbs are alike and distinguish between emotive factives (true factives) and cognitive factives (semi-factives). These two sub-classes evince different syntactic behaviour, cognitive factives being seen as more permissive. With such verbs, event adjunct extraction is reported to be allowed, in some cases (Djarv & Romero 2021). The aim of this paper is to test the availability of adjunct extraction in L2 English. Testing native speakers of Romanian, at an intermediate and advanced level of English, I show that the extraction of adjuncts out of the post-verbal clause of a factive verb is banned in L2, irrespective of predicate type or level of proficiency. \\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":30451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31178/bwpl.24.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/bwpl.24.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实动词通常被认为会导致弱孤岛效应,禁止从后动词性从句中提取辅词,但不禁止从论点中提取。然而,文献中的许多研究(Karttunen 1971, Hooper & Thompson 1973, Djarv 2019)表明,并非所有的动词都是相似的,并且区分了情感动词(真动词)和认知动词(半动词)。这两个子类表现出不同的句法行为,认知因素被视为更宽容。据报道,在某些情况下,这些动词可以提取事件助动词(djjarv & Romero 2021)。本文的目的是测试二语英语中助词提取的有效性。我测试了母语为罗马尼亚语的中级和高级英语水平的人,结果表明,在第二语言中,无论谓语类型或熟练程度如何,都禁止从主动动词的动后从句中提取补语。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extraction in L2 English:Are factive verbs all alike?
"Factive verbs are traditionally said to induce weak island effects, banning the extraction of adjuncts, but not that of arguments, out of their post-verbal clause. However, many studies in the literature (Karttunen 1971, Hooper & Thompson 1973, Djarv 2019) show that not all factive verbs are alike and distinguish between emotive factives (true factives) and cognitive factives (semi-factives). These two sub-classes evince different syntactic behaviour, cognitive factives being seen as more permissive. With such verbs, event adjunct extraction is reported to be allowed, in some cases (Djarv & Romero 2021). The aim of this paper is to test the availability of adjunct extraction in L2 English. Testing native speakers of Romanian, at an intermediate and advanced level of English, I show that the extraction of adjuncts out of the post-verbal clause of a factive verb is banned in L2, irrespective of predicate type or level of proficiency. "
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信