{"title":"现实主义边缘的大师","authors":"David J. Bailey","doi":"10.3368/lbr.58.1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite their renown for different aesthetic styles, this article argues that Machado de Assis and Eça de Queirós explored similar, classical representations of male friendship to problematize dominant understandings of relationships in patriarchal- capitalist society, and that such representations underpin their mutual development of confused and dubious male narrators in their later novels. In addition, it argues that the intertwined degradation of love and truth in their work reflects the precarious position of Portugal and Brazil at the end of the nineteenth century, at the periphery of British imperialism, European Realism and the burgeoning world of commerce and consumption. Beginning with O primo Basílio and considering in turn Quincas Borba, A relíquia and Dom Casmurro, the article demonstrates how early concerns about the inauthenticity of bourgeois marriage and friendship—whereby economic interests thwart the pursuit of true love—culminate in the singular novels of the 1880s and 90s, in which narrators struggle to recognize and articulate their feelings for their male peers. The argument thus draws links between characterization, literary form and social context, whilst proposing a greater degree of influence between the two authors than is generally acknowledged, amounting to a transatlantic criticism of the dominant ideology in the west at the time.","PeriodicalId":52041,"journal":{"name":"Luso-Brazilian Review","volume":"86 1","pages":"22 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mestres na periferia do realismo\",\"authors\":\"David J. Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/lbr.58.1.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite their renown for different aesthetic styles, this article argues that Machado de Assis and Eça de Queirós explored similar, classical representations of male friendship to problematize dominant understandings of relationships in patriarchal- capitalist society, and that such representations underpin their mutual development of confused and dubious male narrators in their later novels. In addition, it argues that the intertwined degradation of love and truth in their work reflects the precarious position of Portugal and Brazil at the end of the nineteenth century, at the periphery of British imperialism, European Realism and the burgeoning world of commerce and consumption. Beginning with O primo Basílio and considering in turn Quincas Borba, A relíquia and Dom Casmurro, the article demonstrates how early concerns about the inauthenticity of bourgeois marriage and friendship—whereby economic interests thwart the pursuit of true love—culminate in the singular novels of the 1880s and 90s, in which narrators struggle to recognize and articulate their feelings for their male peers. The argument thus draws links between characterization, literary form and social context, whilst proposing a greater degree of influence between the two authors than is generally acknowledged, amounting to a transatlantic criticism of the dominant ideology in the west at the time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Luso-Brazilian Review\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Luso-Brazilian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.58.1.22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Luso-Brazilian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.58.1.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管马查多·德·阿西斯和埃帕拉达·德·Queirós以各自不同的审美风格而闻名,但本文认为,他们探索了相似的、经典的男性友谊表现形式,以质疑男权资本主义社会中对两性关系的主流理解,这种表现形式支撑了他们在后来的小说中相互发展的困惑和可疑的男性叙述者。此外,它还认为,在他们的作品中,爱情和真理的堕落交织在一起,反映了19世纪末葡萄牙和巴西处于英国帝国主义、欧洲现实主义和蓬勃发展的商业和消费世界边缘的不稳定地位。从O primo Basílio开始,依次考虑到昆卡斯·博尔巴、A relíquia和Dom Casmurro,文章展示了早期对资产阶级婚姻和友谊的不真实性的担忧——经济利益阻碍了对真爱的追求——在19世纪80年代和90年代的奇异小说中达到高潮,在这些小说中,叙述者努力认识并表达他们对男性同龄人的感情。因此,这一论点在人物塑造、文学形式和社会背景之间建立了联系,同时提出了两位作者之间比一般认为的更大程度的影响,相当于对当时西方主流意识形态的跨大西洋批评。
Despite their renown for different aesthetic styles, this article argues that Machado de Assis and Eça de Queirós explored similar, classical representations of male friendship to problematize dominant understandings of relationships in patriarchal- capitalist society, and that such representations underpin their mutual development of confused and dubious male narrators in their later novels. In addition, it argues that the intertwined degradation of love and truth in their work reflects the precarious position of Portugal and Brazil at the end of the nineteenth century, at the periphery of British imperialism, European Realism and the burgeoning world of commerce and consumption. Beginning with O primo Basílio and considering in turn Quincas Borba, A relíquia and Dom Casmurro, the article demonstrates how early concerns about the inauthenticity of bourgeois marriage and friendship—whereby economic interests thwart the pursuit of true love—culminate in the singular novels of the 1880s and 90s, in which narrators struggle to recognize and articulate their feelings for their male peers. The argument thus draws links between characterization, literary form and social context, whilst proposing a greater degree of influence between the two authors than is generally acknowledged, amounting to a transatlantic criticism of the dominant ideology in the west at the time.
期刊介绍:
Luso-Brazilian Review publishes interdisciplinary scholarship on Portuguese, Brazilian, and Lusophone African cultures, with special emphasis on scholarly works in literature, history, and the social sciences. Each issue of the Luso-Brazilian Review includes articles and book reviews, which may be written in either English or Portuguese.