全面母性的路径

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maureen O'Dougherty
{"title":"全面母性的路径","authors":"Maureen O'Dougherty","doi":"10.3368/lbr.57.1.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines discourses on motherhood among young middle-class Brazilian women in Rio de Janeiro for whom the challenge of reconciling motherhood and employment constituted a key drama. Interviews revealed women’s multiple strategies, both traditional and modern, including securing a professional position, having two children later in life, and relying on childcare aid of domestic workers and/or grandmothers. Analysis of their stories and commentaries identified three discourses: the first, favoring more direct care than preceding generations; the second, opposing “totalizing” motherhood, i.e., finding stay at home motherhood disagreeable and asserting that women are better mothers with an outside occupation; the third, a discourse of guilt. I suggest the evaluations both justify choices regarding a mother’s employment and attest to the speaker’s emotional and moral absorption in motherhood. Thus, I find a moral/emotional intensification of mothering allows these middle-class Brazilian women to partially escape from and partially accept a totalizing motherhood.","PeriodicalId":52041,"journal":{"name":"Luso-Brazilian Review","volume":"57 1","pages":"101 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paths Into and Out of Totalizing Motherhood\",\"authors\":\"Maureen O'Dougherty\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/lbr.57.1.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines discourses on motherhood among young middle-class Brazilian women in Rio de Janeiro for whom the challenge of reconciling motherhood and employment constituted a key drama. Interviews revealed women’s multiple strategies, both traditional and modern, including securing a professional position, having two children later in life, and relying on childcare aid of domestic workers and/or grandmothers. Analysis of their stories and commentaries identified three discourses: the first, favoring more direct care than preceding generations; the second, opposing “totalizing” motherhood, i.e., finding stay at home motherhood disagreeable and asserting that women are better mothers with an outside occupation; the third, a discourse of guilt. I suggest the evaluations both justify choices regarding a mother’s employment and attest to the speaker’s emotional and moral absorption in motherhood. Thus, I find a moral/emotional intensification of mothering allows these middle-class Brazilian women to partially escape from and partially accept a totalizing motherhood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Luso-Brazilian Review\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Luso-Brazilian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.57.1.101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Luso-Brazilian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.57.1.101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了巴西巴西年轻中产阶级女性关于母性的话语,对她们来说,调和母性和就业的挑战构成了一个关键的戏剧。采访揭示了女性的多种策略,既有传统的,也有现代的,包括获得一个专业职位,晚生两个孩子,依靠家政工人和/或祖母的照顾。对他们的故事和评论的分析确定了三种话语:第一种,比前几代人更倾向于直接关怀;第二,反对“集权化”母性,即认为呆在家里的母性是令人不快的,并断言女性有一份外面的职业是更好的母亲;第三篇,关于罪恶感的论述。我认为,这些评价既证明了关于母亲就业的选择是合理的,也证明了说话者对母亲身份的情感和道德投入。因此,我发现母性的道德/情感强化使这些中产阶级巴西妇女部分地逃避和部分地接受了母性的整体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paths Into and Out of Totalizing Motherhood
This article examines discourses on motherhood among young middle-class Brazilian women in Rio de Janeiro for whom the challenge of reconciling motherhood and employment constituted a key drama. Interviews revealed women’s multiple strategies, both traditional and modern, including securing a professional position, having two children later in life, and relying on childcare aid of domestic workers and/or grandmothers. Analysis of their stories and commentaries identified three discourses: the first, favoring more direct care than preceding generations; the second, opposing “totalizing” motherhood, i.e., finding stay at home motherhood disagreeable and asserting that women are better mothers with an outside occupation; the third, a discourse of guilt. I suggest the evaluations both justify choices regarding a mother’s employment and attest to the speaker’s emotional and moral absorption in motherhood. Thus, I find a moral/emotional intensification of mothering allows these middle-class Brazilian women to partially escape from and partially accept a totalizing motherhood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Luso-Brazilian Review
Luso-Brazilian Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Luso-Brazilian Review publishes interdisciplinary scholarship on Portuguese, Brazilian, and Lusophone African cultures, with special emphasis on scholarly works in literature, history, and the social sciences. Each issue of the Luso-Brazilian Review includes articles and book reviews, which may be written in either English or Portuguese.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信