基于修改后的黑分数为碳信用定价

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yi Song, D. Chang
{"title":"基于修改后的黑分数为碳信用定价","authors":"Yi Song, D. Chang","doi":"10.30638/eemj.2023.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to develop the carbon emission market in a positive and healthy direction, how to price carbon emission rights effectively is an issue worth studying. This paper compares the advantages, disadvantages and applicability of several commonly used pricing methods, and finally chooses the Black-Scholes model (hereinafter referred to as ‘B-S’ model) as the base model to carry out the study. Since the volatility of carbon emission rights is subject to fluctuations, the historical volatility in the BS model cannot fully reflect the real market situation. In order to solve this problem, the GARCH model is introduced to fit the volatility of returns to improve the accuracy of the BS model. However, as the amount of data increases, the modeling ability of the GARCH model cannot fully simulate volatility. The GARCH model is the most commonly used model for modeling the volatility of financial time series data, while the LSTM model requires high initial values. The combination of the two models improves the accuracy of the model and is tested by empirical evidence. The results of this paper enrich the theoretical system of carbon emission rights assessment.","PeriodicalId":11685,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Engineering and Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRICING CARBON CREDITS BASED ON MODIFIED BLACK-SCHOLES\",\"authors\":\"Yi Song, D. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.30638/eemj.2023.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to develop the carbon emission market in a positive and healthy direction, how to price carbon emission rights effectively is an issue worth studying. This paper compares the advantages, disadvantages and applicability of several commonly used pricing methods, and finally chooses the Black-Scholes model (hereinafter referred to as ‘B-S’ model) as the base model to carry out the study. Since the volatility of carbon emission rights is subject to fluctuations, the historical volatility in the BS model cannot fully reflect the real market situation. In order to solve this problem, the GARCH model is introduced to fit the volatility of returns to improve the accuracy of the BS model. However, as the amount of data increases, the modeling ability of the GARCH model cannot fully simulate volatility. The GARCH model is the most commonly used model for modeling the volatility of financial time series data, while the LSTM model requires high initial values. The combination of the two models improves the accuracy of the model and is tested by empirical evidence. The results of this paper enrich the theoretical system of carbon emission rights assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Engineering and Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Engineering and Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2023.037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Engineering and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2023.037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了使碳排放市场朝着积极健康的方向发展,如何对碳排放权进行有效定价是一个值得研究的问题。本文比较了几种常用的定价方法的优缺点和适用性,最终选择Black-Scholes模型(以下简称“B-S”模型)作为基础模型进行研究。由于碳排放权的波动率会受到波动的影响,因此BS模型中的历史波动率并不能完全反映真实的市场情况。为了解决这一问题,引入GARCH模型来拟合收益的波动性,以提高BS模型的准确性。然而,随着数据量的增加,GARCH模型的建模能力并不能完全模拟波动率。GARCH模型是金融时间序列数据波动率建模最常用的模型,而LSTM模型对初始值要求较高。两种模型的结合提高了模型的准确性,并得到了经验证据的检验。本文的研究成果丰富了碳排放权评估的理论体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRICING CARBON CREDITS BASED ON MODIFIED BLACK-SCHOLES
In order to develop the carbon emission market in a positive and healthy direction, how to price carbon emission rights effectively is an issue worth studying. This paper compares the advantages, disadvantages and applicability of several commonly used pricing methods, and finally chooses the Black-Scholes model (hereinafter referred to as ‘B-S’ model) as the base model to carry out the study. Since the volatility of carbon emission rights is subject to fluctuations, the historical volatility in the BS model cannot fully reflect the real market situation. In order to solve this problem, the GARCH model is introduced to fit the volatility of returns to improve the accuracy of the BS model. However, as the amount of data increases, the modeling ability of the GARCH model cannot fully simulate volatility. The GARCH model is the most commonly used model for modeling the volatility of financial time series data, while the LSTM model requires high initial values. The combination of the two models improves the accuracy of the model and is tested by empirical evidence. The results of this paper enrich the theoretical system of carbon emission rights assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Engineering and Management Journal is an international journal that publishes reviewed original research papers of both experimental and theoretical nature in the following areas: environmental impact assessment; environmental integrated management; risk assessment and management; environmental chemistry; environmental protection technologies (water, air, soil); pollution reduction at source and waste minimization; chemical and biological process engineering; cleaner production, products and services; sensors in environment control; sources of radiation and protection technologies; waste valorization technologies and management; environmental biotechnology; energy and environment; modelling, simulation and optimization for environmental protection; technologies for drinking and industrial water; life cycle assessments of products; environmental strategies and policies; cost-profitt analysis in environmental protection; eco-industry and environmental market; environmental education and sustainable development. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal will publish: original communications describing important new discoveries or further developments in the above-mentioned topics; reviews, mainly of new rapidly developing areas of environmental protection; special themed issues on relevant topics; advertising.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信