{"title":"对麦克尤恩关于希斯考克的回应,《你门前的标志》","authors":"N. Hiscock","doi":"10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The publication of Indra McEwen’s Review of my book, The Symbol at Your Door [2008] is to be welcomed for several reasons. That an exploration of medieval architectural design should be reviewed in a journal of classical philosophy and science suggests an encouraging breadth of interest in the subject and recognizes the interdisciplinary intent of the book. The Journal’s policy to invite authors to respond to reviews acknowledges that critics should be as accountable as the authors and publishers of the work reviewed, a reciprocation which is much needed and long overdue. Of obvious value is the opportunity to discuss matters raised or omitted by critics and the critical methodology used. All this is most welcome.","PeriodicalId":30096,"journal":{"name":"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to McEwen on Hiscock, The Symbol at Your Door\",\"authors\":\"N. Hiscock\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The publication of Indra McEwen’s Review of my book, The Symbol at Your Door [2008] is to be welcomed for several reasons. That an exploration of medieval architectural design should be reviewed in a journal of classical philosophy and science suggests an encouraging breadth of interest in the subject and recognizes the interdisciplinary intent of the book. The Journal’s policy to invite authors to respond to reviews acknowledges that critics should be as accountable as the authors and publishers of the work reviewed, a reciprocation which is much needed and long overdue. Of obvious value is the opportunity to discuss matters raised or omitted by critics and the critical methodology used. All this is most welcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
因德拉·麦克尤恩(Indra McEwen)对我的书《你门口的符号》(The Symbol at Your Door)的评论[2008]的出版受到了欢迎,原因有几个。中世纪建筑设计的探索应该在一本古典哲学和科学杂志上发表,这表明人们对这一主题的兴趣非常广泛,并且认识到这本书的跨学科意图。《华尔街日报》邀请作者对评论作出回应的政策承认,评论家应该像被评论作品的作者和出版商一样负责,这是一种非常需要而且早就应该得到的回报。显而易见的价值是有机会讨论评论家提出或遗漏的问题以及所使用的批评方法。所有这些都是最受欢迎的。
A Response to McEwen on Hiscock, The Symbol at Your Door
The publication of Indra McEwen’s Review of my book, The Symbol at Your Door [2008] is to be welcomed for several reasons. That an exploration of medieval architectural design should be reviewed in a journal of classical philosophy and science suggests an encouraging breadth of interest in the subject and recognizes the interdisciplinary intent of the book. The Journal’s policy to invite authors to respond to reviews acknowledges that critics should be as accountable as the authors and publishers of the work reviewed, a reciprocation which is much needed and long overdue. Of obvious value is the opportunity to discuss matters raised or omitted by critics and the critical methodology used. All this is most welcome.