对麦克尤恩关于希斯考克的回应,《你门前的标志》

N. Hiscock
{"title":"对麦克尤恩关于希斯考克的回应,《你门前的标志》","authors":"N. Hiscock","doi":"10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The publication of Indra McEwen’s Review of my book, The Symbol at Your Door [2008] is to be welcomed for several reasons. That an exploration of medieval architectural design should be reviewed in a journal of classical philosophy and science suggests an encouraging breadth of interest in the subject and recognizes the interdisciplinary intent of the book. The Journal’s policy to invite authors to respond to reviews acknowledges that critics should be as accountable as the authors and publishers of the work reviewed, a reciprocation which is much needed and long overdue. Of obvious value is the opportunity to discuss matters raised or omitted by critics and the critical methodology used. All this is most welcome.","PeriodicalId":30096,"journal":{"name":"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to McEwen on Hiscock, The Symbol at Your Door\",\"authors\":\"N. Hiscock\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The publication of Indra McEwen’s Review of my book, The Symbol at Your Door [2008] is to be welcomed for several reasons. That an exploration of medieval architectural design should be reviewed in a journal of classical philosophy and science suggests an encouraging breadth of interest in the subject and recognizes the interdisciplinary intent of the book. The Journal’s policy to invite authors to respond to reviews acknowledges that critics should be as accountable as the authors and publishers of the work reviewed, a reciprocation which is much needed and long overdue. Of obvious value is the opportunity to discuss matters raised or omitted by critics and the critical methodology used. All this is most welcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aestimatio Critical Reviews in the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/AESTIMATIO.V5I0.25871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因德拉·麦克尤恩(Indra McEwen)对我的书《你门口的符号》(The Symbol at Your Door)的评论[2008]的出版受到了欢迎,原因有几个。中世纪建筑设计的探索应该在一本古典哲学和科学杂志上发表,这表明人们对这一主题的兴趣非常广泛,并且认识到这本书的跨学科意图。《华尔街日报》邀请作者对评论作出回应的政策承认,评论家应该像被评论作品的作者和出版商一样负责,这是一种非常需要而且早就应该得到的回报。显而易见的价值是有机会讨论评论家提出或遗漏的问题以及所使用的批评方法。所有这些都是最受欢迎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Response to McEwen on Hiscock, The Symbol at Your Door
The publication of Indra McEwen’s Review of my book, The Symbol at Your Door [2008] is to be welcomed for several reasons. That an exploration of medieval architectural design should be reviewed in a journal of classical philosophy and science suggests an encouraging breadth of interest in the subject and recognizes the interdisciplinary intent of the book. The Journal’s policy to invite authors to respond to reviews acknowledges that critics should be as accountable as the authors and publishers of the work reviewed, a reciprocation which is much needed and long overdue. Of obvious value is the opportunity to discuss matters raised or omitted by critics and the critical methodology used. All this is most welcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信