视觉模拟量表评估慢性颈部疼痛患者心理状态的有效性

Z. Dimitriadis, N. Strimpakos, E. Kapreli, J. Oldham
{"title":"视觉模拟量表评估慢性颈部疼痛患者心理状态的有效性","authors":"Z. Dimitriadis, N. Strimpakos, E. Kapreli, J. Oldham","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2014.907852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: Examination of visual analog scale’s [VAS] validity for assessing psychological states in patients with chronic neck pain. Methods: Forty-five patients with chronic neck pain completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing were additionally assessed by using a VAS for each. Results: Only the anxiety VAS could correlate high enough with its corresponding questionnaire. This correlation was higher than any other of its correlations with the other psychological instruments. Conclusions: The VAS seems to be a valid scale for assessing anxiety in patients with chronic neck pain.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"22 1","pages":"242 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2014.907852","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Visual Analog Scales for Assessing Psychological States in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain\",\"authors\":\"Z. Dimitriadis, N. Strimpakos, E. Kapreli, J. Oldham\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10582452.2014.907852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: Examination of visual analog scale’s [VAS] validity for assessing psychological states in patients with chronic neck pain. Methods: Forty-five patients with chronic neck pain completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing were additionally assessed by using a VAS for each. Results: Only the anxiety VAS could correlate high enough with its corresponding questionnaire. This correlation was higher than any other of its correlations with the other psychological instruments. Conclusions: The VAS seems to be a valid scale for assessing anxiety in patients with chronic neck pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"242 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2014.907852\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2014.907852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2014.907852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:探讨视觉模拟量表(VAS)在慢性颈部疼痛患者心理状态评估中的有效性。方法:45例慢性颈部疼痛患者完成医院焦虑抑郁量表、坦帕运动恐惧症量表和疼痛灾难化量表。对焦虑、抑郁、运动恐惧症和灾难化分别使用VAS进行评估。结果:只有焦虑VAS与相应的问卷具有足够高的相关性。这种相关性比其他任何心理工具的相关性都要高。结论:VAS似乎是评估慢性颈痛患者焦虑的有效量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of Visual Analog Scales for Assessing Psychological States in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain
Abstract Objectives: Examination of visual analog scale’s [VAS] validity for assessing psychological states in patients with chronic neck pain. Methods: Forty-five patients with chronic neck pain completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing were additionally assessed by using a VAS for each. Results: Only the anxiety VAS could correlate high enough with its corresponding questionnaire. This correlation was higher than any other of its correlations with the other psychological instruments. Conclusions: The VAS seems to be a valid scale for assessing anxiety in patients with chronic neck pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信