有无外周性疼痛受试者的头颈动觉

B. Ramsayer, Marina Honold, K. Beck, M. Kraus, M. Kramer, C. Dehner
{"title":"有无外周性疼痛受试者的头颈动觉","authors":"B. Ramsayer, Marina Honold, K. Beck, M. Kraus, M. Kramer, C. Dehner","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2013.851760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: Studies of patients with chronic degenerative neck pain and of those with chronic whiplash–associated disorders have identified a cervicocephalic kinaesthesia [CK] deficit compared to healthy controls. Up until now, it remains unknown if this deficit in CK is caused by neck pain–induced concentration deficits or by functional neck disorders itself. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there is a negative influence on the CK by inducing an experimental peripheral pain stimulus. Methods: A prospective diagnostic study including 21 males and 29 females was performed. The subjects were placed in a virtual reality system by using a head mounted display and were asked to follow a moving globe. The deviation between the expected and the documented head position was recorded under static and dynamic conditions. The subjects were investigated in a cross-over design. There was on each of the two days a measurement free from pain and a measurement with a peripheral-induced pain stimulus. Results: There were no significant differences concerning the static and dynamic joint repositioning error on both measurements. Furthermore, the interindividual analysis shows no trend between the measurements with and without the pain stimulus. Conclusions: In summary, it could be found that a peripheral-induced pain stimulus did not affect the CK of the cervical spine.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"21 1","pages":"327 - 333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2013.851760","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervicocephalic Kinaesthesia in Subjects with and without Peripherally Induced Pain\",\"authors\":\"B. Ramsayer, Marina Honold, K. Beck, M. Kraus, M. Kramer, C. Dehner\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10582452.2013.851760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: Studies of patients with chronic degenerative neck pain and of those with chronic whiplash–associated disorders have identified a cervicocephalic kinaesthesia [CK] deficit compared to healthy controls. Up until now, it remains unknown if this deficit in CK is caused by neck pain–induced concentration deficits or by functional neck disorders itself. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there is a negative influence on the CK by inducing an experimental peripheral pain stimulus. Methods: A prospective diagnostic study including 21 males and 29 females was performed. The subjects were placed in a virtual reality system by using a head mounted display and were asked to follow a moving globe. The deviation between the expected and the documented head position was recorded under static and dynamic conditions. The subjects were investigated in a cross-over design. There was on each of the two days a measurement free from pain and a measurement with a peripheral-induced pain stimulus. Results: There were no significant differences concerning the static and dynamic joint repositioning error on both measurements. Furthermore, the interindividual analysis shows no trend between the measurements with and without the pain stimulus. Conclusions: In summary, it could be found that a peripheral-induced pain stimulus did not affect the CK of the cervical spine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"327 - 333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2013.851760\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2013.851760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2013.851760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要目的:对慢性退行性颈部疼痛患者和慢性鞭扭伤相关疾病患者的研究发现,与健康对照相比,颈-头运动感觉[CK]缺陷。到目前为止,尚不清楚CK的这种缺陷是由颈部疼痛引起的注意力缺陷还是由功能性颈部疾病本身引起的。本研究的目的是探讨通过诱导实验性外周疼痛刺激是否对CK有负面影响。方法:对21名男性和29名女性进行前瞻性诊断研究。受试者通过头戴式显示器被置于虚拟现实系统中,并被要求跟随一个移动的地球仪。在静态和动态条件下记录预期头部位置与记录头部位置之间的偏差。受试者采用交叉设计进行调查。这两天的每一天都有一个没有疼痛的测量和一个有外周诱发的疼痛刺激的测量。结果:两种测量方法的静态和动态关节复位误差无显著差异。此外,个体间分析显示,在有疼痛刺激和没有疼痛刺激的情况下,测量结果之间没有趋势。结论:综上所述,外周性疼痛刺激对颈椎CK无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cervicocephalic Kinaesthesia in Subjects with and without Peripherally Induced Pain
Abstract Objectives: Studies of patients with chronic degenerative neck pain and of those with chronic whiplash–associated disorders have identified a cervicocephalic kinaesthesia [CK] deficit compared to healthy controls. Up until now, it remains unknown if this deficit in CK is caused by neck pain–induced concentration deficits or by functional neck disorders itself. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there is a negative influence on the CK by inducing an experimental peripheral pain stimulus. Methods: A prospective diagnostic study including 21 males and 29 females was performed. The subjects were placed in a virtual reality system by using a head mounted display and were asked to follow a moving globe. The deviation between the expected and the documented head position was recorded under static and dynamic conditions. The subjects were investigated in a cross-over design. There was on each of the two days a measurement free from pain and a measurement with a peripheral-induced pain stimulus. Results: There were no significant differences concerning the static and dynamic joint repositioning error on both measurements. Furthermore, the interindividual analysis shows no trend between the measurements with and without the pain stimulus. Conclusions: In summary, it could be found that a peripheral-induced pain stimulus did not affect the CK of the cervical spine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信