外用山金车治疗疼痛、肿胀、瘀伤疗效的系统评价

N. Brito, P. Knipschild, Jorge Doreste-Alonso
{"title":"外用山金车治疗疼痛、肿胀、瘀伤疗效的系统评价","authors":"N. Brito, P. Knipschild, Jorge Doreste-Alonso","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2014.883012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Arnica montana has been used as a remedy for centuries, and is common today for the treatment of pain, swelling and bruises. However its efficacy remains controversial. The authors systematically review the literature on the efficacy of A. montana applied topically. Literature searches of the main electronic databases on topical Arnica were performed. Also relevant experts and the herbal industry were consulted. Data was analyzed and the methodological quality assessed. Findings: Eleven controlled trials were found, five in volunteers and six in patients. Heterogeneity in the health conditions, Arnica dosage, co-interventions, and effects measurements was high, and many studies had important methodological flaws. Often, the number of participants was small and there were potential risks for bias. We identified a trend to better quality as the studies were more recent. Even the better studies showed at most a modest effect. Conclusion: The efficacy of Arnica in doses of 10% and below is not supported by the available evidence. More research is needed to determine if higher doses would be effective and remain safe.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"22 1","pages":"216 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2014.883012","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Topical Arnica montana for the Treatment of Pain, Swelling and Bruises\",\"authors\":\"N. Brito, P. Knipschild, Jorge Doreste-Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10582452.2014.883012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Arnica montana has been used as a remedy for centuries, and is common today for the treatment of pain, swelling and bruises. However its efficacy remains controversial. The authors systematically review the literature on the efficacy of A. montana applied topically. Literature searches of the main electronic databases on topical Arnica were performed. Also relevant experts and the herbal industry were consulted. Data was analyzed and the methodological quality assessed. Findings: Eleven controlled trials were found, five in volunteers and six in patients. Heterogeneity in the health conditions, Arnica dosage, co-interventions, and effects measurements was high, and many studies had important methodological flaws. Often, the number of participants was small and there were potential risks for bias. We identified a trend to better quality as the studies were more recent. Even the better studies showed at most a modest effect. Conclusion: The efficacy of Arnica in doses of 10% and below is not supported by the available evidence. More research is needed to determine if higher doses would be effective and remain safe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"216 - 223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2014.883012\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2014.883012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2014.883012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要背景:几个世纪以来,蒙大拿山金车一直被用作一种药物,今天用于治疗疼痛、肿胀和瘀伤。然而,它的功效仍然存在争议。本文系统地综述了国内外有关蒙大拿外用药效的文献。检索了有关金金车的主要电子数据库。还咨询了相关专家和草药行业。对数据进行分析,并对方法质量进行评估。研究发现:共发现了11项对照试验,其中5项是志愿者试验,6项是患者试验。健康状况、山金车剂量、联合干预措施和效果测量的异质性很高,许多研究在方法上存在重大缺陷。通常,参与者的数量很少,存在潜在的偏倚风险。随着研究时间的增加,我们发现了质量提高的趋势。即使是较好的研究也最多显示出适度的效果。结论:山金车在10%及以下剂量下的治疗效果不明显。需要更多的研究来确定更高的剂量是否有效并保持安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Topical Arnica montana for the Treatment of Pain, Swelling and Bruises
Abstract Background: Arnica montana has been used as a remedy for centuries, and is common today for the treatment of pain, swelling and bruises. However its efficacy remains controversial. The authors systematically review the literature on the efficacy of A. montana applied topically. Literature searches of the main electronic databases on topical Arnica were performed. Also relevant experts and the herbal industry were consulted. Data was analyzed and the methodological quality assessed. Findings: Eleven controlled trials were found, five in volunteers and six in patients. Heterogeneity in the health conditions, Arnica dosage, co-interventions, and effects measurements was high, and many studies had important methodological flaws. Often, the number of participants was small and there were potential risks for bias. We identified a trend to better quality as the studies were more recent. Even the better studies showed at most a modest effect. Conclusion: The efficacy of Arnica in doses of 10% and below is not supported by the available evidence. More research is needed to determine if higher doses would be effective and remain safe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信