F. Morilla, L. Abasolo, M. Blanco, I. Méndez, J. Jover, B. Fernández-Gutiérrez
{"title":"与肌肉骨骼疼痛相关的工作残疾:系统动力学方法","authors":"F. Morilla, L. Abasolo, M. Blanco, I. Méndez, J. Jover, B. Fernández-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.3109/10582452.2014.883007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To apply system dynamics methodology to study the evolution of temporary work disability in the context of pain-related musculoskeletal disorders [MSD-TWD]. Methods: Data were obtained from the MSD-TWD program records on 13 077 patients with acute disability [7805 in the control group [CG]; 5272 in the intervention group [IG]] who suffered 16 297 episodes of temporary work disability. Samples were randomized into two homogeneous sub-samples for validation purposes. The dynamic model developed with system dynamics methodology included 20 variables [five levels, seven rates, two auxiliary variables, six parameters], five differential equations, and eight algebraic equations. A sensitivity analysis of various scenarios was carried out. Results: Episodes were described according to their duration; short-term and long-term MSD-TWD. By tuning the model parameters, the actual survival curves of both groups in the two sub-samples were almost exactly reproduced. An explicit temporal expression of the survival curve was used in solving the equations of the dynamic model. The mean duration of short-term episodes was 18 days [d] in the CG and 14 d in the IG, while the mean duration of long-term episodes was 98 and 57 d, respectively. The conversion rate from short-term to long-term work disability was 7.3% in the CG compared with 3.5% in the IG. The model was cross-validated. Sensitivity analysis showed no overlap between the CG and IC curves. Conclusion: The dynamic model proposed is an excellent approach to the generic temporary work disability process, and is also able to explain the effects of intervention on the process.","PeriodicalId":50121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","volume":"22 1","pages":"51 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2014.883007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Pain: A System Dynamics Approach\",\"authors\":\"F. Morilla, L. Abasolo, M. Blanco, I. Méndez, J. Jover, B. Fernández-Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10582452.2014.883007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: To apply system dynamics methodology to study the evolution of temporary work disability in the context of pain-related musculoskeletal disorders [MSD-TWD]. Methods: Data were obtained from the MSD-TWD program records on 13 077 patients with acute disability [7805 in the control group [CG]; 5272 in the intervention group [IG]] who suffered 16 297 episodes of temporary work disability. Samples were randomized into two homogeneous sub-samples for validation purposes. The dynamic model developed with system dynamics methodology included 20 variables [five levels, seven rates, two auxiliary variables, six parameters], five differential equations, and eight algebraic equations. A sensitivity analysis of various scenarios was carried out. Results: Episodes were described according to their duration; short-term and long-term MSD-TWD. By tuning the model parameters, the actual survival curves of both groups in the two sub-samples were almost exactly reproduced. An explicit temporal expression of the survival curve was used in solving the equations of the dynamic model. The mean duration of short-term episodes was 18 days [d] in the CG and 14 d in the IG, while the mean duration of long-term episodes was 98 and 57 d, respectively. The conversion rate from short-term to long-term work disability was 7.3% in the CG compared with 3.5% in the IG. The model was cross-validated. Sensitivity analysis showed no overlap between the CG and IC curves. Conclusion: The dynamic model proposed is an excellent approach to the generic temporary work disability process, and is also able to explain the effects of intervention on the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10582452.2014.883007\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2014.883007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2014.883007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Pain: A System Dynamics Approach
Abstract Objective: To apply system dynamics methodology to study the evolution of temporary work disability in the context of pain-related musculoskeletal disorders [MSD-TWD]. Methods: Data were obtained from the MSD-TWD program records on 13 077 patients with acute disability [7805 in the control group [CG]; 5272 in the intervention group [IG]] who suffered 16 297 episodes of temporary work disability. Samples were randomized into two homogeneous sub-samples for validation purposes. The dynamic model developed with system dynamics methodology included 20 variables [five levels, seven rates, two auxiliary variables, six parameters], five differential equations, and eight algebraic equations. A sensitivity analysis of various scenarios was carried out. Results: Episodes were described according to their duration; short-term and long-term MSD-TWD. By tuning the model parameters, the actual survival curves of both groups in the two sub-samples were almost exactly reproduced. An explicit temporal expression of the survival curve was used in solving the equations of the dynamic model. The mean duration of short-term episodes was 18 days [d] in the CG and 14 d in the IG, while the mean duration of long-term episodes was 98 and 57 d, respectively. The conversion rate from short-term to long-term work disability was 7.3% in the CG compared with 3.5% in the IG. The model was cross-validated. Sensitivity analysis showed no overlap between the CG and IC curves. Conclusion: The dynamic model proposed is an excellent approach to the generic temporary work disability process, and is also able to explain the effects of intervention on the process.