助听器临床研究:基于消费者经验的横断面纵向审计:Estudio clinico de auxiliares audiaudis: Revision横向审计revisión basado en las expericias del consumidor

A. Parving, P. Sibelle
{"title":"助听器临床研究:基于消费者经验的横断面纵向审计:Estudio clinico de auxiliares audiaudis: Revision横向审计revisión basado en las expericias del consumidor","authors":"A. Parving, P. Sibelle","doi":"10.3109/00206090109073099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present audit was to document improvements/changes in hearing instrument (HI) benefit in terms of use and satisfaction throughout the 1990s and compare the benefit in consumers fitted with analogue (A), programmable (P), and digital signal processing (DSP) His. The audit data are based on a questionnaire mailed to subjects fitted with His 3 to 4 months after the fitting, including questions concerning satisfaction with the HI, use of the HI, ability to manage the HI, and satisfaction with the overall services in the department. Information was obtained from 32,694 subjects (i.e., 71.2 per cent of those fitted with His throughout the last decade), with a median age at fitting of 78 years (range, 18-102), with a preponderance of females. No significant differences in age, gender distribution, and hearing instrument distribution were found between the respondents and non-respondents. The audit shows that there are no significant differences in any of the benefit parameters throughout the decade, irrespective of the introduction of P-HIs in 1995 and of the DSP-HIs in 1998. Thus, from the consumers’ perspective, no changes have appeared in the last decade. A comparative analysis of the A-HIs, P-Hls, and DSP-HIs shows that among those provided with P-HIs and DSP-HIs, only 69.6 per cent (CI 68.1-71.0) and 65.5 per cent (CI 60.2-78.8), respectively, were very satisfied/satisfied with the HI, which is significantly less than the 73.5 per cent (CI 72.4-74.5) in those fitted with A-HIs. The daily/weekly use of all three types of His was similar. However, the group fitted with DSP-HIs was significantly less satisfied with the general services compared with those fitted with A-HIs and P-HIs, respectively. Based on these audit data, it is concluded that, according to the consumers, the outcome from His has not changed over the last decade, and a comparison between the traditional A-HIs with both P-HIs and DSP-HIs is in favour of the traditional A-HIs.","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"43 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206090109073099","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Study of Hearing Instruments: A Cross-sectional Longitudinal Audit Based on Consumer Experiences:Estudio clinico de auxiliares auditivos: Revision transversal de revisión basado en las experiencias del consumidor\",\"authors\":\"A. Parving, P. Sibelle\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00206090109073099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present audit was to document improvements/changes in hearing instrument (HI) benefit in terms of use and satisfaction throughout the 1990s and compare the benefit in consumers fitted with analogue (A), programmable (P), and digital signal processing (DSP) His. The audit data are based on a questionnaire mailed to subjects fitted with His 3 to 4 months after the fitting, including questions concerning satisfaction with the HI, use of the HI, ability to manage the HI, and satisfaction with the overall services in the department. Information was obtained from 32,694 subjects (i.e., 71.2 per cent of those fitted with His throughout the last decade), with a median age at fitting of 78 years (range, 18-102), with a preponderance of females. No significant differences in age, gender distribution, and hearing instrument distribution were found between the respondents and non-respondents. The audit shows that there are no significant differences in any of the benefit parameters throughout the decade, irrespective of the introduction of P-HIs in 1995 and of the DSP-HIs in 1998. Thus, from the consumers’ perspective, no changes have appeared in the last decade. A comparative analysis of the A-HIs, P-Hls, and DSP-HIs shows that among those provided with P-HIs and DSP-HIs, only 69.6 per cent (CI 68.1-71.0) and 65.5 per cent (CI 60.2-78.8), respectively, were very satisfied/satisfied with the HI, which is significantly less than the 73.5 per cent (CI 72.4-74.5) in those fitted with A-HIs. The daily/weekly use of all three types of His was similar. However, the group fitted with DSP-HIs was significantly less satisfied with the general services compared with those fitted with A-HIs and P-HIs, respectively. Based on these audit data, it is concluded that, according to the consumers, the outcome from His has not changed over the last decade, and a comparison between the traditional A-HIs with both P-HIs and DSP-HIs is in favour of the traditional A-HIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206090109073099\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206090109073099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206090109073099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本次审计的目的是记录整个20世纪90年代助听器(HI)在使用和满意度方面的改进/变化,并比较安装模拟(A)、可编程(P)和数字信号处理(DSP)助听器的消费者的收益。审计数据是基于一份调查问卷,该问卷在His装配后3到4个月邮寄给受试者,包括对HI的满意度、使用HI的能力、管理HI的能力以及对部门整体服务的满意度。从32,694名受试者(即在过去十年中符合His的受试者中占71.2%)获得信息,其拟合年龄中位数为78岁(范围18-102岁),以女性为主。调查对象与非调查对象在年龄、性别分布、助听器分布等方面均无显著差异。审计结果表明,在整个十年中,不论1995年是否采用了P-HIs和1998年是否采用了sp - his,任何效益参数都没有显著差异。因此,从消费者的角度来看,在过去的十年中没有出现任何变化。A- his、P-Hls和DSP-HIs的比较分析表明,在配备P-HIs和DSP-HIs的患者中,分别只有69.6% (CI 68.1-71.0)和65.5% (CI 60.2-78.8)对HI非常满意/满意,明显低于配备A- his的患者的73.5% (CI 72.4-74.5)。每天/每周使用这三种类型的His是相似的。然而,与A-HIs组和P-HIs组相比,sp - his组对一般服务的满意度明显低于P-HIs组。根据这些审计数据,得出的结论是,根据消费者的意见,His的结果在过去十年中没有改变,传统a - His与P-HIs和DSP-HIs之间的比较有利于传统a - His。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Study of Hearing Instruments: A Cross-sectional Longitudinal Audit Based on Consumer Experiences:Estudio clinico de auxiliares auditivos: Revision transversal de revisión basado en las experiencias del consumidor
The objective of the present audit was to document improvements/changes in hearing instrument (HI) benefit in terms of use and satisfaction throughout the 1990s and compare the benefit in consumers fitted with analogue (A), programmable (P), and digital signal processing (DSP) His. The audit data are based on a questionnaire mailed to subjects fitted with His 3 to 4 months after the fitting, including questions concerning satisfaction with the HI, use of the HI, ability to manage the HI, and satisfaction with the overall services in the department. Information was obtained from 32,694 subjects (i.e., 71.2 per cent of those fitted with His throughout the last decade), with a median age at fitting of 78 years (range, 18-102), with a preponderance of females. No significant differences in age, gender distribution, and hearing instrument distribution were found between the respondents and non-respondents. The audit shows that there are no significant differences in any of the benefit parameters throughout the decade, irrespective of the introduction of P-HIs in 1995 and of the DSP-HIs in 1998. Thus, from the consumers’ perspective, no changes have appeared in the last decade. A comparative analysis of the A-HIs, P-Hls, and DSP-HIs shows that among those provided with P-HIs and DSP-HIs, only 69.6 per cent (CI 68.1-71.0) and 65.5 per cent (CI 60.2-78.8), respectively, were very satisfied/satisfied with the HI, which is significantly less than the 73.5 per cent (CI 72.4-74.5) in those fitted with A-HIs. The daily/weekly use of all three types of His was similar. However, the group fitted with DSP-HIs was significantly less satisfied with the general services compared with those fitted with A-HIs and P-HIs, respectively. Based on these audit data, it is concluded that, according to the consumers, the outcome from His has not changed over the last decade, and a comparison between the traditional A-HIs with both P-HIs and DSP-HIs is in favour of the traditional A-HIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信