Sahul更新世轴:对Morwood和Tresize的响应

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Queensland Archaeological Research Pub Date : 1990-01-01 DOI:10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129

S. Sutton

{"title":"Sahul更新世轴:对Morwood和Tresize的响应","authors":"S. Sutton","doi":"10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is written in response to ideas and information presented by Morwood and Tresize (1989) pertaining to the antiquity and distribution of axes in Sahul and in particular to one axe from S.E. Cape York. It is felt that this response is necessary because, whilst Morwood and Tresize raise some important issues and identify some apparent trends in the late Pleistocene of Sahul, their paper also engenders some confusion about these and other issues.Â Whilst I will not contend that the axe is a \"false fact\" it is true that serious consideration to the validity of the inferences Morwood and Tresize present is necessary due to the nascent nature of our understanding of Pleistocene humans and Morwood and Tresize's suggestions in this regard.","PeriodicalId":37597,"journal":{"name":"Queensland Archaeological Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"95-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pleistocene Axes in Sahul: a response to Morwood and Tresize\",\"authors\":\"S. Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is written in response to ideas and information presented by Morwood and Tresize (1989) pertaining to the antiquity and distribution of axes in Sahul and in particular to one axe from S.E. Cape York. It is felt that this response is necessary because, whilst Morwood and Tresize raise some important issues and identify some apparent trends in the late Pleistocene of Sahul, their paper also engenders some confusion about these and other issues.Â Whilst I will not contend that the axe is a \\\"false fact\\\" it is true that serious consideration to the validity of the inferences Morwood and Tresize present is necessary due to the nascent nature of our understanding of Pleistocene humans and Morwood and Tresize's suggestions in this regard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Queensland Archaeological Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"95-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Queensland Archaeological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/QAR.7.1990.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文是根据Morwood和Tresize(1989)提出的观点和信息撰写的，这些观点和信息与Sahul的斧头的古代和分布有关，特别是来自南开普约克的一把斧头。我们认为这种回应是必要的，因为尽管Morwood和Tresize提出了一些重要的问题，并确定了Sahul晚更新世的一些明显趋势，但他们的论文也引起了对这些问题和其他问题的一些混淆。Â虽然我不会争辩说斧头是一个“错误的事实”，但确实有必要认真考虑Morwood和Tresize提出的推论的有效性，因为我们对更新世人类以及Morwood和Tresize在这方面的建议的理解是新生的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Pleistocene Axes in Sahul: a response to Morwood and Tresize

This paper is written in response to ideas and information presented by Morwood and Tresize (1989) pertaining to the antiquity and distribution of axes in Sahul and in particular to one axe from S.E. Cape York. It is felt that this response is necessary because, whilst Morwood and Tresize raise some important issues and identify some apparent trends in the late Pleistocene of Sahul, their paper also engenders some confusion about these and other issues.Â Whilst I will not contend that the axe is a "false fact" it is true that serious consideration to the validity of the inferences Morwood and Tresize present is necessary due to the nascent nature of our understanding of Pleistocene humans and Morwood and Tresize's suggestions in this regard.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Queensland Archaeological Research Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Queensland Archaeological Research is a peer-reviewed journal published since 1984 devoted to publishing substantive, original and high-quality archaeological research pertaining to Queensland, Australia and adjacent areas. Data-rich manuscripts are particularly welcome. Queensland Archaeological Research is published in English in one volume each year. Submission of articles to Queensland Archaeological Research is free. Access to articles in Queensland Archaeological Research is free.