立宪主义或民粹主义

Q3 Social Sciences
Informatologia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.32914/i.55.1-2.8
V. Kovalchuk, B. Melnychenko, K. Marysyuk, Y. Bohiv, S. Poliarush-Safronenko
{"title":"立宪主义或民粹主义","authors":"V. Kovalchuk, B. Melnychenko, K. Marysyuk, Y. Bohiv, S. Poliarush-Safronenko","doi":"10.32914/i.55.1-2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors have conducted the political and legal analysis of such phenomena in modern civilization as constitutionalism and populism, their value and institutional foundations, and the negative impact of populist parties on the constitution transformations under democratic transition. The article proves that populists treat any legal procedures and institutions negatively, particularly those that cannot sat-isfy their goals. A means of political struggle populist parties resort to is the diminution of judiciary independence and the role of constitutional jurisdiction bodies. The experience of Central and Eastern European countries shows that it is almost impossible to combine populist legislation with the inde-pendence of constitutional jurisdiction bodies. The article emphasizes that populist parties, which enjoy a high credit of public trust, are trying to expand their powers by adopting populist constitutions.","PeriodicalId":35333,"journal":{"name":"Informatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutionalism or populism\",\"authors\":\"V. Kovalchuk, B. Melnychenko, K. Marysyuk, Y. Bohiv, S. Poliarush-Safronenko\",\"doi\":\"10.32914/i.55.1-2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors have conducted the political and legal analysis of such phenomena in modern civilization as constitutionalism and populism, their value and institutional foundations, and the negative impact of populist parties on the constitution transformations under democratic transition. The article proves that populists treat any legal procedures and institutions negatively, particularly those that cannot sat-isfy their goals. A means of political struggle populist parties resort to is the diminution of judiciary independence and the role of constitutional jurisdiction bodies. The experience of Central and Eastern European countries shows that it is almost impossible to combine populist legislation with the inde-pendence of constitutional jurisdiction bodies. The article emphasizes that populist parties, which enjoy a high credit of public trust, are trying to expand their powers by adopting populist constitutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32914/i.55.1-2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32914/i.55.1-2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者对宪政和民粹主义等现代文明现象及其价值和制度基础,以及民主转型下民粹政党对宪政转型的负面影响进行了政治和法律分析。本文证明,民粹主义者对任何法律程序和制度,特别是那些不能满足其目标的法律程序和制度,都持否定态度。民粹主义政党诉诸的政治斗争手段是削弱司法独立和宪法管辖机构的作用。中欧和东欧国家的经验表明,几乎不可能将民粹主义立法与宪法管辖机构的独立性结合起来。文章强调说,国民信赖度较高的民粹主义政党试图通过民粹主义宪法扩大权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constitutionalism or populism
The authors have conducted the political and legal analysis of such phenomena in modern civilization as constitutionalism and populism, their value and institutional foundations, and the negative impact of populist parties on the constitution transformations under democratic transition. The article proves that populists treat any legal procedures and institutions negatively, particularly those that cannot sat-isfy their goals. A means of political struggle populist parties resort to is the diminution of judiciary independence and the role of constitutional jurisdiction bodies. The experience of Central and Eastern European countries shows that it is almost impossible to combine populist legislation with the inde-pendence of constitutional jurisdiction bodies. The article emphasizes that populist parties, which enjoy a high credit of public trust, are trying to expand their powers by adopting populist constitutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informatologia
Informatologia Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: INFORMATOLOGIA is scientific journal which is dealing with general and specific problems in scientific field of Information Science. INFORMATOLOGIA publishes scientific and professional papers from information and communication sciences, which are refering to theory, technology and praxis of information and communication, education, communication science, journalism, public relations, media and visual communication, organisation and translotology and papers from related scientific fields. INFORMATOLOGIA is beeing published over thirty years and it gathers prominent experts in field of Information and Communication Science. The journal is published four times a year and it publishes scientific papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信