恩格斯与原始社会史的当代问题

Iu. V. Bromlei, A. I. Pershit
{"title":"恩格斯与原始社会史的当代问题","authors":"Iu. V. Bromlei, A. I. Pershit","doi":"10.2753/AAE1061-1959230435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A hundred years have passed since publication of the first edition of Engels's book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, which Lenin regarded as \"one of the basic works of modern socialism.\"1 Engels's interest in the remote past of mankind and Lenin's evaluation of his work were, of course, not coincidental. They may be explained by the tremendous role played by the concept of primitive history in a general materialist understanding of the universal historical process. What was the nature of this very first term in the sequence of socioeconomic formations, this cornerstone of the Marxist concept of universal history? When did private property, antagonistic social classes, and state power, separate from the people, emerge, and what were they, original and permanent institutions, or historically determined institutions of human communal life? These problems are clearly of great philosophical importance. They were, and continue to be, the arena of a bitter ideological struggle, and inev...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"23 1","pages":"17-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/AAE1061-1959230435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frederick Engels and Contemporary Problems Concerning the History of Primitive Society\",\"authors\":\"Iu. V. Bromlei, A. I. Pershit\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/AAE1061-1959230435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A hundred years have passed since publication of the first edition of Engels's book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, which Lenin regarded as \\\"one of the basic works of modern socialism.\\\"1 Engels's interest in the remote past of mankind and Lenin's evaluation of his work were, of course, not coincidental. They may be explained by the tremendous role played by the concept of primitive history in a general materialist understanding of the universal historical process. What was the nature of this very first term in the sequence of socioeconomic formations, this cornerstone of the Marxist concept of universal history? When did private property, antagonistic social classes, and state power, separate from the people, emerge, and what were they, original and permanent institutions, or historically determined institutions of human communal life? These problems are clearly of great philosophical importance. They were, and continue to be, the arena of a bitter ideological struggle, and inev...\",\"PeriodicalId\":85576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet studies in philosophy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"17-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/AAE1061-1959230435\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet studies in philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/AAE1061-1959230435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet studies in philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/AAE1061-1959230435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被列宁称为“现代社会主义基本著作之一”的恩格斯《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》第一版出版至今已有100年。恩格斯对人类遥远的过去的兴趣和列宁对他的工作的评价当然不是巧合。原始历史概念在一般唯物主义对普遍历史过程的理解中所起的巨大作用,可以解释这一现象。社会经济形态序列的第一个术语,马克思主义普遍历史概念的基石,其本质是什么?私有财产、敌对的社会阶级和国家权力是什么时候从人民中分离出来的?它们是什么?是原始的和永久的机构,还是历史决定的人类公共生活机构?这些问题显然具有重大的哲学意义。它们过去是,并将继续是激烈的意识形态斗争的舞台,而且……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frederick Engels and Contemporary Problems Concerning the History of Primitive Society
A hundred years have passed since publication of the first edition of Engels's book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, which Lenin regarded as "one of the basic works of modern socialism."1 Engels's interest in the remote past of mankind and Lenin's evaluation of his work were, of course, not coincidental. They may be explained by the tremendous role played by the concept of primitive history in a general materialist understanding of the universal historical process. What was the nature of this very first term in the sequence of socioeconomic formations, this cornerstone of the Marxist concept of universal history? When did private property, antagonistic social classes, and state power, separate from the people, emerge, and what were they, original and permanent institutions, or historically determined institutions of human communal life? These problems are clearly of great philosophical importance. They were, and continue to be, the arena of a bitter ideological struggle, and inev...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信