基于SWAT模型的湿润热带地区土地利用影响评价产流方法比较

IF 0.6 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
E. Yamamoto, T. Sayama, Kodai Yamamoto, Apip
{"title":"基于SWAT模型的湿润热带地区土地利用影响评价产流方法比较","authors":"E. Yamamoto, T. Sayama, Kodai Yamamoto, Apip","doi":"10.3178/hrl.14.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrological responses due to deforestation in a humid tropical catchment were analyzed using two runoff genera‐ tion methods available in the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: the Curve Number (CN) and the GreenAmpt (GA) methods. The calibrated model, which per‐ formed well in simulating runoff under present land use condition in the Batanghari River Basin, Indonesia (42,960 km2), was then used to simulate runoff using past and future land use scenarios. Simulations showed similar changes in the annual water budget: decreasing evaporation and increasing total discharge. However, the two methods showed opposite changes in flow regimes: high flow increased (13%) under the CN while low flow increased (27%) under the GA. These results are associated with dif‐ ferences in runoff generation mechanisms, where surface runoff contributes to total discharge to a much larger extent under the CN (43%) than the GA (4%). Land use changes caused a reduction in infiltration rate, leading to higher high flow under the CN, while high flow did not change under the GA. Instead, lower evapotranspiration increased groundwater flow under the GA, and thus the steady low flow increased. This study suggests that the runoff genera‐ tion method should be selected carefully based on the dom‐ inant flow pathway of a catchment, particularly for land use impact studies in the humid tropics.","PeriodicalId":13111,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Research Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3178/hrl.14.81","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of runoff generation methods for land use impact assessment using the SWAT model in humid tropics\",\"authors\":\"E. Yamamoto, T. Sayama, Kodai Yamamoto, Apip\",\"doi\":\"10.3178/hrl.14.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hydrological responses due to deforestation in a humid tropical catchment were analyzed using two runoff genera‐ tion methods available in the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: the Curve Number (CN) and the GreenAmpt (GA) methods. The calibrated model, which per‐ formed well in simulating runoff under present land use condition in the Batanghari River Basin, Indonesia (42,960 km2), was then used to simulate runoff using past and future land use scenarios. Simulations showed similar changes in the annual water budget: decreasing evaporation and increasing total discharge. However, the two methods showed opposite changes in flow regimes: high flow increased (13%) under the CN while low flow increased (27%) under the GA. These results are associated with dif‐ ferences in runoff generation mechanisms, where surface runoff contributes to total discharge to a much larger extent under the CN (43%) than the GA (4%). Land use changes caused a reduction in infiltration rate, leading to higher high flow under the CN, while high flow did not change under the GA. Instead, lower evapotranspiration increased groundwater flow under the GA, and thus the steady low flow increased. This study suggests that the runoff genera‐ tion method should be selected carefully based on the dom‐ inant flow pathway of a catchment, particularly for land use impact studies in the humid tropics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3178/hrl.14.81\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.14.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.14.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

利用土壤水分评估工具(SWAT)模型中的两种径流生成方法:曲线数(CN)和GreenAmpt (GA)方法,分析了热带湿润流域森林砍伐引起的水文响应。校正后的模型可以很好地模拟印尼巴丹哈里河流域(42,960平方公里)当前土地利用条件下的径流,然后用于模拟过去和未来土地利用情景下的径流。模拟结果显示了相似的年水收支变化:蒸发量减少,总排放量增加。然而,两种方法的流型变化相反,在CN下高流量增加(13%),而在GA下低流量增加(27%)。这些结果与产流机制的差异有关,在CN下,地表径流对总流量的贡献(43%)比GA(4%)大得多。土地利用变化导致入渗速率降低,CN下高流量增大,而GA下高流量没有变化。相反,低蒸散发增加了GA下的地下水流量,从而增加了稳定的低流量。这项研究表明,径流生成方法应根据集水区的主要流量路径仔细选择,特别是在潮湿热带地区的土地利用影响研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of runoff generation methods for land use impact assessment using the SWAT model in humid tropics
Hydrological responses due to deforestation in a humid tropical catchment were analyzed using two runoff genera‐ tion methods available in the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: the Curve Number (CN) and the GreenAmpt (GA) methods. The calibrated model, which per‐ formed well in simulating runoff under present land use condition in the Batanghari River Basin, Indonesia (42,960 km2), was then used to simulate runoff using past and future land use scenarios. Simulations showed similar changes in the annual water budget: decreasing evaporation and increasing total discharge. However, the two methods showed opposite changes in flow regimes: high flow increased (13%) under the CN while low flow increased (27%) under the GA. These results are associated with dif‐ ferences in runoff generation mechanisms, where surface runoff contributes to total discharge to a much larger extent under the CN (43%) than the GA (4%). Land use changes caused a reduction in infiltration rate, leading to higher high flow under the CN, while high flow did not change under the GA. Instead, lower evapotranspiration increased groundwater flow under the GA, and thus the steady low flow increased. This study suggests that the runoff genera‐ tion method should be selected carefully based on the dom‐ inant flow pathway of a catchment, particularly for land use impact studies in the humid tropics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Research Letters (HRL) is an international and trans-disciplinary electronic online journal published jointly by Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources (JSHWR), Japanese Association of Groundwater Hydrology (JAGH), Japanese Association of Hydrological Sciences (JAHS), and Japanese Society of Physical Hydrology (JSPH), aiming at rapid exchange and outgoing of information in these fields. The purpose is to disseminate original research findings and develop debates on a wide range of investigations on hydrology and water resources to researchers, students and the public. It also publishes reviews of various fields on hydrology and water resources and other information of interest to scientists to encourage communication and utilization of the published results. The editors welcome contributions from authors throughout the world. The decision on acceptance of a submitted manuscript is made by the journal editors on the basis of suitability of subject matter to the scope of the journal, originality of the contribution, potential impacts on societies and scientific merit. Manuscripts submitted to HRL may cover all aspects of hydrology and water resources, including research on physical and biological sciences, engineering, and social and political sciences from the aspects of hydrology and water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信