管辖权剥离,宪法至上,以及单方面的影响

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
T. J. Weiman
{"title":"管辖权剥离,宪法至上,以及单方面的影响","authors":"T. J. Weiman","doi":"10.2307/4150638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THEODORE J. WEIMAN On July 22, 2004, the House of Representatives passed the Marriage Protection Act of 2004, a bill that would strip the federal courts of jurisdiction over cases challenging the constitutionality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. Two months later, the House passed a similar bill that would curtail federal court jurisdiction for challenges to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance or its recitation. Though perhaps unlikely to pass the Senate, the bills represent an attempt by Congress to avoid potential federal court determination of issues involving important areas of constitutional law with the hope of","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"153 1","pages":"1677"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4150638","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jurisdiction Stripping, Constitutional Supremacy, and the Implications of Ex Parte Young\",\"authors\":\"T. J. Weiman\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/4150638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THEODORE J. WEIMAN On July 22, 2004, the House of Representatives passed the Marriage Protection Act of 2004, a bill that would strip the federal courts of jurisdiction over cases challenging the constitutionality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. Two months later, the House passed a similar bill that would curtail federal court jurisdiction for challenges to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance or its recitation. Though perhaps unlikely to pass the Senate, the bills represent an attempt by Congress to avoid potential federal court determination of issues involving important areas of constitutional law with the hope of\",\"PeriodicalId\":48012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"1677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4150638\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/4150638\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4150638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2004年7月22日,众议院通过了《2004年婚姻保护法》,该法案将剥夺联邦法院对挑战1996年《婚姻保护法》合宪性的案件的管辖权。两个月后,众议院通过了一项类似的法案,该法案将限制联邦法院对质疑效忠誓言或其背诵是否符合宪法的管辖权。尽管参议院可能不太可能通过这些法案,但这些法案代表了国会的一种尝试,以避免联邦法院对涉及宪法重要领域的问题作出裁决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jurisdiction Stripping, Constitutional Supremacy, and the Implications of Ex Parte Young
THEODORE J. WEIMAN On July 22, 2004, the House of Representatives passed the Marriage Protection Act of 2004, a bill that would strip the federal courts of jurisdiction over cases challenging the constitutionality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. Two months later, the House passed a similar bill that would curtail federal court jurisdiction for challenges to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance or its recitation. Though perhaps unlikely to pass the Senate, the bills represent an attempt by Congress to avoid potential federal court determination of issues involving important areas of constitutional law with the hope of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信