混合移植物与腘绳肌腱自体移植物在ACL重建后的失败率无差异

A. Jimenez, R. Kakazu, Barton R. Branam, A. Colosimo, B. Grawe
{"title":"混合移植物与腘绳肌腱自体移植物在ACL重建后的失败率无差异","authors":"A. Jimenez, R. Kakazu, Barton R. Branam, A. Colosimo, B. Grawe","doi":"10.26502/JOSM.5115003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hamstring tendon autografts, for ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction, have demonstrated a higher re-rupture rates when graft diameter of <8 mm is chosen. In the event that an autograft yield a graft diameter <8 mm, augmentation with allograft creates a hybrid graft with increased diameter. Clinical outcomes of this hybrid graft have yet to be established. Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and failure rates of an adult population who undergo augmentation with allograft compared to patients with hamstring autograft alone. Methods: A retrospective chart review of primary ACL reconstructions performed by 4 sports fellowship trained surgeons at a single institution between 2010-2016 identified 23 patients with hamstring autografts and allograft augmentation. A comparison group of 23 patients consisted of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft of >8 mm diameter was then selected. The comparison group was matched based on age within 3 years. Graft failure was defined as revision ACL reconstruction or evidence of graft failure on clinical exam (no end point on lachman or pivot shift) or MRI evidence of retear. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Marx Activity, and Knee injury Osteoarthritis and Outcome (KOOS) scores were obtained. Patients were contacted to obtain information regarding outcome scores, revision procedures, return to sport, and complications. A minimum follow up time was set at 12 months. Results: Forty-six patients met criteria for inclusion in this study and had follow up data. The hybrid group had a total of 23 patients consisting of 7 men and 16 women with an average age of 31 years (Range 17-51 years). The autograft group had a total of 23 patients consisting of 17 men and 6 women with an average age of 33.3 years (Range 15-48). The average follow-up between both groups was 31.5 months (range 12-63 months). The graft failure rate in the hybrid group was 8.7% (2 of 23 patients), while the autograft group demonstrated a graft failure rate of 4.3% (1 of 23 patients) (p=0.49). In the hybrid ACL group, the mean IKDC was 67.8 (CI 59.8-75.9) compared to 73.8 (CI 66.6-80.9) in the autograft group (p=0.26). The average KOOS scores for the hybrid group was 75.8 (CI 67.5-84.1) compared to 86.5 (CI 81.4-91.7) in the autograft group (p=0.03). Conclusions: In an adult population, allografts augmented hybrid ACL grafts showed no statistically significant difference compared to hamstring autograft in graft failure rates. The autograft ACL group demonstrated a higher KOOS score, though the IKDC was equivalent.","PeriodicalId":73881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Difference in Failure Rates Between Hybrid Grafts Compared with Hamstring Autografts Following ACL Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"A. Jimenez, R. Kakazu, Barton R. Branam, A. Colosimo, B. Grawe\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/JOSM.5115003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hamstring tendon autografts, for ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction, have demonstrated a higher re-rupture rates when graft diameter of <8 mm is chosen. In the event that an autograft yield a graft diameter <8 mm, augmentation with allograft creates a hybrid graft with increased diameter. Clinical outcomes of this hybrid graft have yet to be established. Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and failure rates of an adult population who undergo augmentation with allograft compared to patients with hamstring autograft alone. Methods: A retrospective chart review of primary ACL reconstructions performed by 4 sports fellowship trained surgeons at a single institution between 2010-2016 identified 23 patients with hamstring autografts and allograft augmentation. A comparison group of 23 patients consisted of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft of >8 mm diameter was then selected. The comparison group was matched based on age within 3 years. Graft failure was defined as revision ACL reconstruction or evidence of graft failure on clinical exam (no end point on lachman or pivot shift) or MRI evidence of retear. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Marx Activity, and Knee injury Osteoarthritis and Outcome (KOOS) scores were obtained. Patients were contacted to obtain information regarding outcome scores, revision procedures, return to sport, and complications. A minimum follow up time was set at 12 months. Results: Forty-six patients met criteria for inclusion in this study and had follow up data. The hybrid group had a total of 23 patients consisting of 7 men and 16 women with an average age of 31 years (Range 17-51 years). The autograft group had a total of 23 patients consisting of 17 men and 6 women with an average age of 33.3 years (Range 15-48). The average follow-up between both groups was 31.5 months (range 12-63 months). The graft failure rate in the hybrid group was 8.7% (2 of 23 patients), while the autograft group demonstrated a graft failure rate of 4.3% (1 of 23 patients) (p=0.49). In the hybrid ACL group, the mean IKDC was 67.8 (CI 59.8-75.9) compared to 73.8 (CI 66.6-80.9) in the autograft group (p=0.26). The average KOOS scores for the hybrid group was 75.8 (CI 67.5-84.1) compared to 86.5 (CI 81.4-91.7) in the autograft group (p=0.03). Conclusions: In an adult population, allografts augmented hybrid ACL grafts showed no statistically significant difference compared to hamstring autograft in graft failure rates. The autograft ACL group demonstrated a higher KOOS score, though the IKDC was equivalent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/JOSM.5115003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/JOSM.5115003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:腘绳肌腱自体移植物,用于前交叉韧带重建,当移植物直径为8mm时,显示出更高的再破裂率。对照组按年龄在3年内进行配对。移植失败被定义为ACL重建或临床检查中移植失败的证据(拉赫曼或枢轴移位无终点)或MRI证据。获得国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、Marx活动度和膝关节损伤骨关节炎及预后(oos)评分。联系患者以获得有关结果评分、翻修程序、恢复运动和并发症的信息。最低随访时间为12个月。结果:46例患者符合纳入标准,并有随访资料。混合组共有23例患者,其中男性7例,女性16例,平均年龄31岁(17-51岁)。自体移植物组共有23例患者,其中男性17例,女性6例,平均年龄33.3岁(15-48岁)。两组患者平均随访时间为31.5个月(12-63个月)。杂交组移植失败率为8.7%(2 / 23),自体移植组移植失败率为4.3% (1 / 23)(p=0.49)。在混合ACL组中,平均IKDC为67.8 (CI 59.8-75.9),而自体移植组为73.8 (CI 66.6-80.9) (p=0.26)。杂交组的平均KOOS评分为75.8 (CI 67.5-84.1),而自体移植物组的平均KOOS评分为86.5 (CI 81.4-91.7) (p=0.03)。结论:在成人人群中,同种异体增强杂交前交叉韧带移植物与腘绳肌自体移植物相比,移植物失败率无统计学差异。自体ACL移植组的KOOS评分较高,但IKDC相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Difference in Failure Rates Between Hybrid Grafts Compared with Hamstring Autografts Following ACL Reconstruction
Background: Hamstring tendon autografts, for ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction, have demonstrated a higher re-rupture rates when graft diameter of <8 mm is chosen. In the event that an autograft yield a graft diameter <8 mm, augmentation with allograft creates a hybrid graft with increased diameter. Clinical outcomes of this hybrid graft have yet to be established. Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and failure rates of an adult population who undergo augmentation with allograft compared to patients with hamstring autograft alone. Methods: A retrospective chart review of primary ACL reconstructions performed by 4 sports fellowship trained surgeons at a single institution between 2010-2016 identified 23 patients with hamstring autografts and allograft augmentation. A comparison group of 23 patients consisted of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft of >8 mm diameter was then selected. The comparison group was matched based on age within 3 years. Graft failure was defined as revision ACL reconstruction or evidence of graft failure on clinical exam (no end point on lachman or pivot shift) or MRI evidence of retear. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Marx Activity, and Knee injury Osteoarthritis and Outcome (KOOS) scores were obtained. Patients were contacted to obtain information regarding outcome scores, revision procedures, return to sport, and complications. A minimum follow up time was set at 12 months. Results: Forty-six patients met criteria for inclusion in this study and had follow up data. The hybrid group had a total of 23 patients consisting of 7 men and 16 women with an average age of 31 years (Range 17-51 years). The autograft group had a total of 23 patients consisting of 17 men and 6 women with an average age of 33.3 years (Range 15-48). The average follow-up between both groups was 31.5 months (range 12-63 months). The graft failure rate in the hybrid group was 8.7% (2 of 23 patients), while the autograft group demonstrated a graft failure rate of 4.3% (1 of 23 patients) (p=0.49). In the hybrid ACL group, the mean IKDC was 67.8 (CI 59.8-75.9) compared to 73.8 (CI 66.6-80.9) in the autograft group (p=0.26). The average KOOS scores for the hybrid group was 75.8 (CI 67.5-84.1) compared to 86.5 (CI 81.4-91.7) in the autograft group (p=0.03). Conclusions: In an adult population, allografts augmented hybrid ACL grafts showed no statistically significant difference compared to hamstring autograft in graft failure rates. The autograft ACL group demonstrated a higher KOOS score, though the IKDC was equivalent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信