蜱传脑炎疫苗预防流行病学有效性评估的问题

Q4 Medicine
Наталья Пеньевская, Николай Рудаков, С. А. Рудакова
{"title":"蜱传脑炎疫苗预防流行病学有效性评估的问题","authors":"Наталья Пеньевская, Николай Рудаков, С. А. Рудакова","doi":"10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-78-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review analyzes the methodological reasons for the heterogeneity of the results of the evaluation of the epidemiological effectiveness of vaccine prophylaxis of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) using indicators such as the efficiency coefficient (COEF) and the efficiency index (IEF), and their discrepancy with similar indicators of the immunological effectiveness of vaccines. It is shown that the calculation of COEF and IEF according to official statistical reporting is illegal in connection with the emergence of systematic errors of selection due to the impossibility of retrospective formation of compared groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated, comparable in risk of infection and disease. In addition, COEF and IEF do not allow to compare the efficiency of vaccination in different areas in physical and monetary units. Based on the analysis of the literature data on immunogenicity of modern vaccines against TBE, protective titer of antibodies and results of field tests of vaccine efficacy in the conditions of total coverage of the population with vaccinations, the authors conclude that the third generation vaccines against TBE protect against disease 95–98% of persons attacked by ticks. Algorithm for calculating the number of preventable cases of TBE diseases is proposed for a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of vaccination as an anti-epidemic measure in different areas.","PeriodicalId":36064,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","volume":"17 1","pages":"78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Проблемные аспекты оценки эпидемиологической эффективности вакцинопрофилактики клещевого энцефалита\",\"authors\":\"Наталья Пеньевская, Николай Рудаков, С. А. Рудакова\",\"doi\":\"10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-78-88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review analyzes the methodological reasons for the heterogeneity of the results of the evaluation of the epidemiological effectiveness of vaccine prophylaxis of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) using indicators such as the efficiency coefficient (COEF) and the efficiency index (IEF), and their discrepancy with similar indicators of the immunological effectiveness of vaccines. It is shown that the calculation of COEF and IEF according to official statistical reporting is illegal in connection with the emergence of systematic errors of selection due to the impossibility of retrospective formation of compared groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated, comparable in risk of infection and disease. In addition, COEF and IEF do not allow to compare the efficiency of vaccination in different areas in physical and monetary units. Based on the analysis of the literature data on immunogenicity of modern vaccines against TBE, protective titer of antibodies and results of field tests of vaccine efficacy in the conditions of total coverage of the population with vaccinations, the authors conclude that the third generation vaccines against TBE protect against disease 95–98% of persons attacked by ticks. Algorithm for calculating the number of preventable cases of TBE diseases is proposed for a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of vaccination as an anti-epidemic measure in different areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"78-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-78-88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-78-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文分析了利用效率系数(COEF)和效率指数(IEF)等指标评价蜱传脑炎(TBE)疫苗预防流行病学有效性结果存在异质性的方法学原因,以及它们与类似疫苗免疫学有效性指标的差异。报告显示,根据官方统计报告计算COEF和IEF是非法的,因为由于不可能回顾性地形成在感染和疾病风险方面具有可比性的接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的比较组,因此出现了系统的选择错误。此外,COEF和IEF不允许以实物和货币单位比较不同地区的疫苗接种效率。通过对现代流行性腮腺炎疫苗免疫原性、抗体保护效价和疫苗在人群免疫总覆盖率条件下的现场效果试验的文献资料分析,作者认为第三代流行性腮腺炎疫苗对蜱虫攻击人群的免疫保护率为95 ~ 98%。提出了一种计算TBE可预防病例数的算法,用于比较评价不同地区疫苗接种作为防疫措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Проблемные аспекты оценки эпидемиологической эффективности вакцинопрофилактики клещевого энцефалита
This review analyzes the methodological reasons for the heterogeneity of the results of the evaluation of the epidemiological effectiveness of vaccine prophylaxis of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) using indicators such as the efficiency coefficient (COEF) and the efficiency index (IEF), and their discrepancy with similar indicators of the immunological effectiveness of vaccines. It is shown that the calculation of COEF and IEF according to official statistical reporting is illegal in connection with the emergence of systematic errors of selection due to the impossibility of retrospective formation of compared groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated, comparable in risk of infection and disease. In addition, COEF and IEF do not allow to compare the efficiency of vaccination in different areas in physical and monetary units. Based on the analysis of the literature data on immunogenicity of modern vaccines against TBE, protective titer of antibodies and results of field tests of vaccine efficacy in the conditions of total coverage of the population with vaccinations, the authors conclude that the third generation vaccines against TBE protect against disease 95–98% of persons attacked by ticks. Algorithm for calculating the number of preventable cases of TBE diseases is proposed for a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of vaccination as an anti-epidemic measure in different areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信