小流量麻醉在裂孔疝患者围手术期管理中的地位

A. Denysenko, V. Cherniy
{"title":"小流量麻醉在裂孔疝患者围手术期管理中的地位","authors":"A. Denysenko, V. Cherniy","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.4(22).2022.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is relevant to study the perioperative use of minimal gas flow (minimal flow) during inhalation anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical interventions, in particular with hiatal hernia (HH). \nThe aim of the study. To study the possibility of using minimal flow anesthesia with sevoflurane and evaluate its place in the perioperative management of patients with HH. \nMaterial and methods. The study was prospective, not randomized: 128 patients with HH, who underwent laparoscopic cruroraphy with Nissen fundoplication under general anesthesia with sevoflurane with low and minimal gas flow. Age 33-78 years, ASA II-III. (m.-67, w-61). ). In group I (n=66) Fresh Gas Flow (FGF) = 1,0 l/min, in group II (n=62) – FGF ≤0,5 l/min. All patients underwent personalized perioperative energy monitoring using indirect calorimetry. \nThe results. The baseline metabolic parameters were without disturbance and significantly exceeded the basal metabolism. Anesthesia in Group I with a gas flow of 1 L/min was more stable, manageable and predictable. In group II with gas flow ≤ 0,5 l/min, at the stage of crurorrhaphy and fundoplication, there was a decrease in the FiO2–FeO2 gradient to 4,4% and a metabolic disorder of 27,2%, which in 14 (22,6%) patients needed a transition for low flow ventilation mode with gas flow 1l/min. \nConclusions. Personalized perioperative energy monitoring makes it safer to perform inhalation anesthesia with gas flow ≤0,5 l/min. in patients with HH.","PeriodicalId":34164,"journal":{"name":"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MINIMAL FLOW ANESTHESIA, ITS PLACE IN PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH HIATAL HERNIA\",\"authors\":\"A. Denysenko, V. Cherniy\",\"doi\":\"10.31612/2616-4868.4(22).2022.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is relevant to study the perioperative use of minimal gas flow (minimal flow) during inhalation anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical interventions, in particular with hiatal hernia (HH). \\nThe aim of the study. To study the possibility of using minimal flow anesthesia with sevoflurane and evaluate its place in the perioperative management of patients with HH. \\nMaterial and methods. The study was prospective, not randomized: 128 patients with HH, who underwent laparoscopic cruroraphy with Nissen fundoplication under general anesthesia with sevoflurane with low and minimal gas flow. Age 33-78 years, ASA II-III. (m.-67, w-61). ). In group I (n=66) Fresh Gas Flow (FGF) = 1,0 l/min, in group II (n=62) – FGF ≤0,5 l/min. All patients underwent personalized perioperative energy monitoring using indirect calorimetry. \\nThe results. The baseline metabolic parameters were without disturbance and significantly exceeded the basal metabolism. Anesthesia in Group I with a gas flow of 1 L/min was more stable, manageable and predictable. In group II with gas flow ≤ 0,5 l/min, at the stage of crurorrhaphy and fundoplication, there was a decrease in the FiO2–FeO2 gradient to 4,4% and a metabolic disorder of 27,2%, which in 14 (22,6%) patients needed a transition for low flow ventilation mode with gas flow 1l/min. \\nConclusions. Personalized perioperative energy monitoring makes it safer to perform inhalation anesthesia with gas flow ≤0,5 l/min. in patients with HH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(22).2022.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4(22).2022.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究最小气体流量(minimal flow)在腹腔镜手术患者,特别是裂孔疝(HH)患者吸入麻醉围术期的应用是相关的。研究的目的。目的:探讨七氟醚小流量麻醉在HH围手术期治疗中的应用价值。材料和方法。该研究是前瞻性的,非随机的:128例HH患者在七氟醚全身麻醉下,在低流量和最小流量的情况下,接受了Nissen底扩张的腹腔镜下肾造影。年龄33-78岁,ASA II-III。(m -67, w-61)。. 第一组(n=66)新鲜气体流量(FGF) = 1,0 l/min,第二组(n=62) - FGF≤0,5 l/min。所有患者均采用间接量热法进行个性化围手术期能量监测。结果。基线代谢参数无干扰,明显超过基础代谢。1 L/min麻醉组麻醉更加稳定、可控、可预测。气体流量≤0.5 l/min的II组,在缝合和复底阶段,FiO2-FeO2梯度下降至4.4%,代谢紊乱为27.2%,其中14例(22.6%)患者需要过渡到气体流量为1l/min的低流量通气模式。结论。个性化围术期能量监测使气体流量≤0.5 l/min的吸入性麻醉更加安全。HH患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MINIMAL FLOW ANESTHESIA, ITS PLACE IN PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH HIATAL HERNIA
Is relevant to study the perioperative use of minimal gas flow (minimal flow) during inhalation anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical interventions, in particular with hiatal hernia (HH). The aim of the study. To study the possibility of using minimal flow anesthesia with sevoflurane and evaluate its place in the perioperative management of patients with HH. Material and methods. The study was prospective, not randomized: 128 patients with HH, who underwent laparoscopic cruroraphy with Nissen fundoplication under general anesthesia with sevoflurane with low and minimal gas flow. Age 33-78 years, ASA II-III. (m.-67, w-61). ). In group I (n=66) Fresh Gas Flow (FGF) = 1,0 l/min, in group II (n=62) – FGF ≤0,5 l/min. All patients underwent personalized perioperative energy monitoring using indirect calorimetry. The results. The baseline metabolic parameters were without disturbance and significantly exceeded the basal metabolism. Anesthesia in Group I with a gas flow of 1 L/min was more stable, manageable and predictable. In group II with gas flow ≤ 0,5 l/min, at the stage of crurorrhaphy and fundoplication, there was a decrease in the FiO2–FeO2 gradient to 4,4% and a metabolic disorder of 27,2%, which in 14 (22,6%) patients needed a transition for low flow ventilation mode with gas flow 1l/min. Conclusions. Personalized perioperative energy monitoring makes it safer to perform inhalation anesthesia with gas flow ≤0,5 l/min. in patients with HH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信