人权保护对非洲贸易有利吗:来自民主“好”与“坏”邻国的证据

J. Animashaun, C. Ubabukoh
{"title":"人权保护对非洲贸易有利吗:来自民主“好”与“坏”邻国的证据","authors":"J. Animashaun, C. Ubabukoh","doi":"10.26493/1854-6935.19.285-305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study whether institutions supportive of human rights improve trade openness. Strengthening human rights institutions could reduce the adverse consequence of trade on consumers and labour rights. On the other hand, adherence could impose high transaction costs limiting the comparative advantage of many African countries. We study the effect of democratic and human rights institutions on trade openness for 40 African countries from 1960 to 2010. To address endogeneity concerns, we exploit the variation in democracy measurement among geographically proximate neighbours with similar political histories (i.e. an inverse distanceweighted average of democracy among ‘neighbours’). We find that human rights and democratic institutions increase trade in Africa. We find evidence supporting property rights, freedomof domestic movement and the political recruitment process as likely mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":30026,"journal":{"name":"Managing Global Transitions","volume":"1127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Human Rights Protection Good for Trade in Africa: Evidence from Proximity to Democratically ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Neighbouring Countries\",\"authors\":\"J. Animashaun, C. Ubabukoh\",\"doi\":\"10.26493/1854-6935.19.285-305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study whether institutions supportive of human rights improve trade openness. Strengthening human rights institutions could reduce the adverse consequence of trade on consumers and labour rights. On the other hand, adherence could impose high transaction costs limiting the comparative advantage of many African countries. We study the effect of democratic and human rights institutions on trade openness for 40 African countries from 1960 to 2010. To address endogeneity concerns, we exploit the variation in democracy measurement among geographically proximate neighbours with similar political histories (i.e. an inverse distanceweighted average of democracy among ‘neighbours’). We find that human rights and democratic institutions increase trade in Africa. We find evidence supporting property rights, freedomof domestic movement and the political recruitment process as likely mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managing Global Transitions\",\"volume\":\"1127 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managing Global Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.19.285-305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.19.285-305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究支持人权的制度是否能促进贸易开放。加强人权机构可以减少贸易对消费者和劳工权利的不利后果。另一方面,遵守协定可能造成高昂的交易成本,限制了许多非洲国家的比较优势。我们研究了从1960年到2010年40个非洲国家的民主和人权制度对贸易开放的影响。为了解决内质性问题,我们利用具有相似政治历史的地理邻近邻国之间民主测量的差异(即“邻居”之间民主的逆距离加权平均值)。我们发现,人权和民主制度促进了非洲的贸易。我们发现有证据支持产权、国内迁徙自由和政治招募过程可能是机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Human Rights Protection Good for Trade in Africa: Evidence from Proximity to Democratically ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Neighbouring Countries
We study whether institutions supportive of human rights improve trade openness. Strengthening human rights institutions could reduce the adverse consequence of trade on consumers and labour rights. On the other hand, adherence could impose high transaction costs limiting the comparative advantage of many African countries. We study the effect of democratic and human rights institutions on trade openness for 40 African countries from 1960 to 2010. To address endogeneity concerns, we exploit the variation in democracy measurement among geographically proximate neighbours with similar political histories (i.e. an inverse distanceweighted average of democracy among ‘neighbours’). We find that human rights and democratic institutions increase trade in Africa. We find evidence supporting property rights, freedomof domestic movement and the political recruitment process as likely mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书