{"title":"女孩比男孩更擅长阅读吗?哪个男孩?哪个女孩?","authors":"Bozena White","doi":"10.2307/20466650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using data from the reading component of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (N = 113,050), the effects of gender and curricular track for nine sub ‐ scores of reading achievement were investigated. Only students indicating that they did not receive additional programming support were included in the analysis. Gender accounted for less than one per cent of variance in reading achievement. Gender differences for each curricular track were in the close ‐ to ‐ zero and small range. The results suggest that any observed differences may be of little practical consequences, and that the notion of under ‐ achievement of boys’ reading achievement has been greatly overstated. Key words : reading achievement, gender, curricular track, Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test Utilisant des donnees tirees du volet lecture du Test de competences linguistiques de l’Ontario au secondaire (N = 113 050), l’auteure analyse les effets du genre et de la repartition en classes homogenes sur neuf sous ‐ scores ayant trait a la lecture. Seuls les eleves ayant indique qu’ils n’avaient pas recu un soutien supplementaire ont ete inclus dans l’analyse. Le sexe representait moins de 1 % de l’ecart dans les resultats. Les differences selon le sexe pour chaque groupement selon les aptitudes s’approchaient de zero ou etaient tres faibles. Les resultats semblent indiquer que toute difference observee peut n’avoir que peu de consequences pratiques et que la notion de sous ‐ performance des garcons en matiere de lecture a ete grandement exageree. Mots cles : rendement en lecture, genre, repartition en classes homogenes, ecoles secondaires de l’Ontario","PeriodicalId":40063,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20466650","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Girls Better Readers Than Boys? Which Boys? Which Girls?\",\"authors\":\"Bozena White\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/20466650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using data from the reading component of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (N = 113,050), the effects of gender and curricular track for nine sub ‐ scores of reading achievement were investigated. Only students indicating that they did not receive additional programming support were included in the analysis. Gender accounted for less than one per cent of variance in reading achievement. Gender differences for each curricular track were in the close ‐ to ‐ zero and small range. The results suggest that any observed differences may be of little practical consequences, and that the notion of under ‐ achievement of boys’ reading achievement has been greatly overstated. Key words : reading achievement, gender, curricular track, Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test Utilisant des donnees tirees du volet lecture du Test de competences linguistiques de l’Ontario au secondaire (N = 113 050), l’auteure analyse les effets du genre et de la repartition en classes homogenes sur neuf sous ‐ scores ayant trait a la lecture. Seuls les eleves ayant indique qu’ils n’avaient pas recu un soutien supplementaire ont ete inclus dans l’analyse. Le sexe representait moins de 1 % de l’ecart dans les resultats. Les differences selon le sexe pour chaque groupement selon les aptitudes s’approchaient de zero ou etaient tres faibles. Les resultats semblent indiquer que toute difference observee peut n’avoir que peu de consequences pratiques et que la notion de sous ‐ performance des garcons en matiere de lecture a ete grandement exageree. Mots cles : rendement en lecture, genre, repartition en classes homogenes, ecoles secondaires de l’Ontario\",\"PeriodicalId\":40063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/20466650\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/20466650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20466650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64
摘要
使用安大略省中学读写能力测试阅读部分的数据(N = 113,050),研究了性别和课程轨迹对阅读成绩的九个分的影响。只有表明他们没有得到额外编程支持的学生才被包括在分析中。性别对阅读成绩差异的影响不到1%。每个课程的性别差异都接近于零,而且范围很小。结果表明,任何观察到的差异可能都没有什么实际影响,而且男孩阅读成绩不足的概念被大大夸大了。关键词:阅读成绩、性别、课程,安大略省中学文化水平测试中使用des数据轮胎嘟气讲座嘟测试de能力linguistiques de l 'Ontario盟secondaire (N = 113 050), l 'auteure杜雷斯运用体裁分析et de la重新分区en类齐次苏尔九个苏分数ayant特质la讲座。Seuls的数据显示,这些数据不包括单独的数据,也不包括需要分析的数据。男性代表1%的运动,而女性代表较少的结果。少差异,少性别,少群体,少倾向,少接近,少个性,少失败。结果是相似的,个体是不同的,观察是不同的,观察是不同的,结果是不同的,实践是不同的,概念是不同的,表现是不同的,表现是不同的。Mots cles:渲染的讲座,类型,重新划分的班级同质性,ecoles secondary de l 'Ontario
Are Girls Better Readers Than Boys? Which Boys? Which Girls?
Using data from the reading component of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (N = 113,050), the effects of gender and curricular track for nine sub ‐ scores of reading achievement were investigated. Only students indicating that they did not receive additional programming support were included in the analysis. Gender accounted for less than one per cent of variance in reading achievement. Gender differences for each curricular track were in the close ‐ to ‐ zero and small range. The results suggest that any observed differences may be of little practical consequences, and that the notion of under ‐ achievement of boys’ reading achievement has been greatly overstated. Key words : reading achievement, gender, curricular track, Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test Utilisant des donnees tirees du volet lecture du Test de competences linguistiques de l’Ontario au secondaire (N = 113 050), l’auteure analyse les effets du genre et de la repartition en classes homogenes sur neuf sous ‐ scores ayant trait a la lecture. Seuls les eleves ayant indique qu’ils n’avaient pas recu un soutien supplementaire ont ete inclus dans l’analyse. Le sexe representait moins de 1 % de l’ecart dans les resultats. Les differences selon le sexe pour chaque groupement selon les aptitudes s’approchaient de zero ou etaient tres faibles. Les resultats semblent indiquer que toute difference observee peut n’avoir que peu de consequences pratiques et que la notion de sous ‐ performance des garcons en matiere de lecture a ete grandement exageree. Mots cles : rendement en lecture, genre, repartition en classes homogenes, ecoles secondaires de l’Ontario
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Education (CJE) is a national peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the membership of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. The CJE prioritizes research and scholarly writing that is of relevance to the Canadian education community. The journal is read by scholars worldwide, and aims to represent the valuable contributions that Canadian scholars in education continue to make to the field. The Journal accepts and publishes both French and English articles and book reviews. CJE on occasion also publishes international papers that shed light on shared issues and that include Canadian authors as references.