复杂性和诺曼度还有语言联系

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
S. Grandel
{"title":"复杂性和诺曼度还有语言联系","authors":"S. Grandel","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard German is considered to be a high-contact language. Intensive language contact of adult L2-learners leads to simplifications of languages (Trudgill 2009, 2010, 2011a, 2011b). There are, however, indications to be found in the literature that Standard German is morphosyntactically more complex than other Germanic high-contact standards such as English or Norwegian (Campbell / Poser 2008, McWhorter 2008). The German language also shows differences relevant for complexity on an intralingual basis: In an empirical, frequency-based research it is shown that the morphosyntax of the written standard is supposed to be significantly more complex than in spoken everyday language. This leads to the question of a potential factor other than language contact, which influences complexity and may explain the research’s results. A possible effect of normativity will be discussed. This could be especially relevant for the written standard, not only because of its medium but also because of its distinctive prestige within the German-speaking area. Whereas the spoken everyday language – as a fugitive form of communication – naturally underlies less normative pressure. This article represents a project sketch of a dissertation.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphosyntaktische Komplexität, Normativität und Sprachkontakt\",\"authors\":\"S. Grandel\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/zdl-2017-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standard German is considered to be a high-contact language. Intensive language contact of adult L2-learners leads to simplifications of languages (Trudgill 2009, 2010, 2011a, 2011b). There are, however, indications to be found in the literature that Standard German is morphosyntactically more complex than other Germanic high-contact standards such as English or Norwegian (Campbell / Poser 2008, McWhorter 2008). The German language also shows differences relevant for complexity on an intralingual basis: In an empirical, frequency-based research it is shown that the morphosyntax of the written standard is supposed to be significantly more complex than in spoken everyday language. This leads to the question of a potential factor other than language contact, which influences complexity and may explain the research’s results. A possible effect of normativity will be discussed. This could be especially relevant for the written standard, not only because of its medium but also because of its distinctive prestige within the German-speaking area. Whereas the spoken everyday language – as a fugitive form of communication – naturally underlies less normative pressure. This article represents a project sketch of a dissertation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2017-0008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2017-0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

标准德语被认为是一种高度接触的语言。成人l2学习者密集的语言接触导致语言的简化(Trudgill 2009, 2010, 2011 1a, 2011 1b)。然而,在文献中有迹象表明,标准德语在形态句法上比其他日耳曼语的高接触标准,如英语或挪威语更复杂(Campbell / Poser 2008, McWhorter 2008)。德语在语内基础上也显示出与复杂性相关的差异:一项基于频率的实证研究表明,书面标准的词法应该比日常口语要复杂得多。这就引出了一个问题,即除了语言接触之外,还有一个潜在因素会影响复杂性,这或许可以解释研究结果。规范性的可能影响将被讨论。这可能与书面标准特别相关,不仅因为它的媒介,而且因为它在德语地区的独特威望。而日常口语——作为一种暂时的交流形式——自然面临较少的规范压力。这篇文章是一篇论文的项目草图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morphosyntaktische Komplexität, Normativität und Sprachkontakt
Standard German is considered to be a high-contact language. Intensive language contact of adult L2-learners leads to simplifications of languages (Trudgill 2009, 2010, 2011a, 2011b). There are, however, indications to be found in the literature that Standard German is morphosyntactically more complex than other Germanic high-contact standards such as English or Norwegian (Campbell / Poser 2008, McWhorter 2008). The German language also shows differences relevant for complexity on an intralingual basis: In an empirical, frequency-based research it is shown that the morphosyntax of the written standard is supposed to be significantly more complex than in spoken everyday language. This leads to the question of a potential factor other than language contact, which influences complexity and may explain the research’s results. A possible effect of normativity will be discussed. This could be especially relevant for the written standard, not only because of its medium but also because of its distinctive prestige within the German-speaking area. Whereas the spoken everyday language – as a fugitive form of communication – naturally underlies less normative pressure. This article represents a project sketch of a dissertation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Aufsätze, Diskussionsbeiträge, Berichte, Rezensionen und Besprechungsexemplare werden nur an die Adresse der Redaktion erbeten. Für unaufgefordert eingesandte Rezensionsexemplare kann die Gewähr einer Besprechung nicht übernommen werden. Das neue Merkblatt für die Einrichtung von Manuskripten kann bei der Redaktion angefordert oder unter Richtlinien für die Erstellung von Beiträgen heruntergeladen werden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信