生物石与矿物三氧化二石骨料物理力学性能比较

H. Alzraikat, N. Taha, A. Salameh
{"title":"生物石与矿物三氧化二石骨料物理力学性能比较","authors":"H. Alzraikat, N. Taha, A. Salameh","doi":"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I2.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Physical and mechanical properties are important during the selection of materials which is used for root repair and root end filling to ensure their success and longevity. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the compressive and diametral tensile strengths and solubility of Biodentine and ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Material & Methods: Cylindrical samples of tested materials were constructed for compressive and diametral tensile strength. After then, it was immersed in distilled water for 24 hours or 21 days at 37oC before testing. Solubility was determined by preparing discs of each material, and then stored in 50ml distilled water at 37°C for 1, 7, and 21 days. Solubility was measured as the difference between the initial weight and the weight at the end of each storage period. Results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA, Student’s t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (P<0.05). Results: Biodentine showed significantly higher compressive and diametral tensile strength values compared with MTA after 1 day (P<0.01). Strength values of Biodentine significantly decreased after 21 days compared with day 1 (P<0.01). On the other hand, MTA showed a significantly higher diametral tensile strength after 21 days compared with day 1 (P<0.01). Biodentine showed higher solubility than MTA (P<0.05). In addition, the solubility of Biodentine and MTA significantly decreased after 21 days compared with 1 day (P<0.01). Conclusion: Although Biodentine showed higher initial strength than MTA, the values were not significantly different after 21 days. Biodentine was more soluble than MTA. Keywords: Biodentine, Compressive strength, Mineral trioxide aggregate, Tensile strength, Solubility.","PeriodicalId":17001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate\",\"authors\":\"H. Alzraikat, N. Taha, A. Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I2.188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Physical and mechanical properties are important during the selection of materials which is used for root repair and root end filling to ensure their success and longevity. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the compressive and diametral tensile strengths and solubility of Biodentine and ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Material & Methods: Cylindrical samples of tested materials were constructed for compressive and diametral tensile strength. After then, it was immersed in distilled water for 24 hours or 21 days at 37oC before testing. Solubility was determined by preparing discs of each material, and then stored in 50ml distilled water at 37°C for 1, 7, and 21 days. Solubility was measured as the difference between the initial weight and the weight at the end of each storage period. Results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA, Student’s t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (P<0.05). Results: Biodentine showed significantly higher compressive and diametral tensile strength values compared with MTA after 1 day (P<0.01). Strength values of Biodentine significantly decreased after 21 days compared with day 1 (P<0.01). On the other hand, MTA showed a significantly higher diametral tensile strength after 21 days compared with day 1 (P<0.01). Biodentine showed higher solubility than MTA (P<0.05). In addition, the solubility of Biodentine and MTA significantly decreased after 21 days compared with 1 day (P<0.01). Conclusion: Although Biodentine showed higher initial strength than MTA, the values were not significantly different after 21 days. Biodentine was more soluble than MTA. Keywords: Biodentine, Compressive strength, Mineral trioxide aggregate, Tensile strength, Solubility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"121-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I2.188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I2.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

研究背景:在根端修复和根端充填材料的选择中,物理力学性能是保证修复成功和寿命的重要因素。目的:比较Biodentine和prooroot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)的抗压强度和直径抗拉强度以及溶解度。材料与方法:对测试材料的圆柱形样品进行抗压和直径拉伸强度测试。然后在37℃蒸馏水中浸泡24小时或21天后进行测试。通过制备每种材料的圆盘来测定溶解度,然后在50ml蒸馏水中37°C保存1、7和21天。溶解度测量为初始重量与每个贮存期结束时的重量之差。结果采用单因素方差分析、Student’s t检验和Tukey’s HSD事后检验(P<0.05)进行分析。结果:与MTA相比,Biodentine在1 d后抗压强度和直径抗拉强度均显著提高(P<0.01)。与第1天相比,21 d后生物奥登汀的强度值显著降低(P<0.01)。另一方面,MTA在21天后的直径抗拉强度显著高于第1天(P<0.01)。生物牙汀的溶解度高于MTA (P<0.05)。与第1 d相比,21 d后百奥汀和MTA的溶解度显著降低(P<0.01)。结论:虽然Biodentine的初始强度高于MTA,但21 d后的数值差异不显著。生物牙定比MTA更易溶解。关键词:生物石,抗压强度,三氧化矿物骨料,抗拉强度,溶解度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Background: Physical and mechanical properties are important during the selection of materials which is used for root repair and root end filling to ensure their success and longevity. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the compressive and diametral tensile strengths and solubility of Biodentine and ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Material & Methods: Cylindrical samples of tested materials were constructed for compressive and diametral tensile strength. After then, it was immersed in distilled water for 24 hours or 21 days at 37oC before testing. Solubility was determined by preparing discs of each material, and then stored in 50ml distilled water at 37°C for 1, 7, and 21 days. Solubility was measured as the difference between the initial weight and the weight at the end of each storage period. Results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA, Student’s t-test, and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (P<0.05). Results: Biodentine showed significantly higher compressive and diametral tensile strength values compared with MTA after 1 day (P<0.01). Strength values of Biodentine significantly decreased after 21 days compared with day 1 (P<0.01). On the other hand, MTA showed a significantly higher diametral tensile strength after 21 days compared with day 1 (P<0.01). Biodentine showed higher solubility than MTA (P<0.05). In addition, the solubility of Biodentine and MTA significantly decreased after 21 days compared with 1 day (P<0.01). Conclusion: Although Biodentine showed higher initial strength than MTA, the values were not significantly different after 21 days. Biodentine was more soluble than MTA. Keywords: Biodentine, Compressive strength, Mineral trioxide aggregate, Tensile strength, Solubility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信