评估外科手术复杂性的态度量表。

R. Blendon
{"title":"评估外科手术复杂性的态度量表。","authors":"R. Blendon","doi":"10.2307/4594373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DURING the past three decades, considerable effort has been expended in attempting to establish a criterion for evaluation of surgical operative procedures based on their complexity. This effort resulted primarily from the trend, by general hospitals, to restrict the performance of certain types of surgery to persons considered qualified by training and experience (1). Thus, there was a need to distinguish between the surgical complexity of various operative procedures with respect to both the extent of medical staff privileges granted and the basic requirements for training surgeons (2). More recently, interest has grown in studying surgical complexity for the purpose of developing a tool for evaluating hospital utilization. To conduct these studies, researchers have had to devise methods for evaluation of the surgical complexity of specific operative procedures. Over the years, however, the scientific study of surgical complexity has been seriously handicapped because surgical complexity has been extremely difficult to describe objectively and even more difficult to measure quantitatively. This paper describes my effort to delineate surgical operative procedures based on their complexity.","PeriodicalId":78306,"journal":{"name":"HSMHA health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4594373","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An attitude scale for evaluating complexity of surgical procedures.\",\"authors\":\"R. Blendon\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/4594373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"DURING the past three decades, considerable effort has been expended in attempting to establish a criterion for evaluation of surgical operative procedures based on their complexity. This effort resulted primarily from the trend, by general hospitals, to restrict the performance of certain types of surgery to persons considered qualified by training and experience (1). Thus, there was a need to distinguish between the surgical complexity of various operative procedures with respect to both the extent of medical staff privileges granted and the basic requirements for training surgeons (2). More recently, interest has grown in studying surgical complexity for the purpose of developing a tool for evaluating hospital utilization. To conduct these studies, researchers have had to devise methods for evaluation of the surgical complexity of specific operative procedures. Over the years, however, the scientific study of surgical complexity has been seriously handicapped because surgical complexity has been extremely difficult to describe objectively and even more difficult to measure quantitatively. This paper describes my effort to delineate surgical operative procedures based on their complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HSMHA health reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1971-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4594373\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HSMHA health reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/4594373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSMHA health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4594373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的三十年中,人们花费了相当大的努力,试图建立一个基于外科手术程序复杂性的评估标准。这一努力的主要原因是,综合医院倾向于将某些类型的外科手术的执行限制在经过培训和经验合格的人员(1)。因此,有必要在授予医务人员特权的程度和培训外科医生的基本要求(2)方面区分各种手术程序的外科复杂性。为了开发一种评估医院利用的工具,人们对研究手术复杂性的兴趣越来越大。为了进行这些研究,研究人员必须设计出评估特定手术过程的外科复杂性的方法。然而,多年来,外科复杂性的科学研究受到严重阻碍,因为外科复杂性极其难以客观描述,更难以定量测量。本文描述了我根据外科手术程序的复杂性所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An attitude scale for evaluating complexity of surgical procedures.
DURING the past three decades, considerable effort has been expended in attempting to establish a criterion for evaluation of surgical operative procedures based on their complexity. This effort resulted primarily from the trend, by general hospitals, to restrict the performance of certain types of surgery to persons considered qualified by training and experience (1). Thus, there was a need to distinguish between the surgical complexity of various operative procedures with respect to both the extent of medical staff privileges granted and the basic requirements for training surgeons (2). More recently, interest has grown in studying surgical complexity for the purpose of developing a tool for evaluating hospital utilization. To conduct these studies, researchers have had to devise methods for evaluation of the surgical complexity of specific operative procedures. Over the years, however, the scientific study of surgical complexity has been seriously handicapped because surgical complexity has been extremely difficult to describe objectively and even more difficult to measure quantitatively. This paper describes my effort to delineate surgical operative procedures based on their complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信