在南非约翰内斯堡的一个社区样本中探讨个性与文化适应之间的关系

K. Pillay, S. Laher
{"title":"在南非约翰内斯堡的一个社区样本中探讨个性与文化适应之间的关系","authors":"K. Pillay, S. Laher","doi":"10.25159/1812-6371/1862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality and the NEO-PI-R are regarded as the gold standard in personality assessment against which all other tests are compared. The universality of both the model and the test is accepted but evidence from African and Asian contexts is less conclusive. Recently it has been argued that acculturation may be amongst the most important factors influencing responses on personality scales like the NEO-PI-R, thereby influencing replicability of the FFM. Thus, this study explored the relationship between personality and acculturation using the NEO-PI-3 and the South African Acculturation Scale (SAAS) in a convenience sample of 272 South Africans in Johannesburg. Significant personality differences were found between acculturated and unacculturated individuals. With the exception of two Openness to Experience facets (Aesthetics and Values) and two Agreeableness facets (Straightforwardness and Compliance) significant agreement was found between the factor structures of acculturated and unacculturated individuals. These results are discussed within the context of the universality of the FFM and the NEO-PI-3 and the role of acculturation in this context.","PeriodicalId":92427,"journal":{"name":"New voices in psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND ACCULTURATION IN A COMMUNITY SAMPLE FROM JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA\",\"authors\":\"K. Pillay, S. Laher\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/1812-6371/1862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality and the NEO-PI-R are regarded as the gold standard in personality assessment against which all other tests are compared. The universality of both the model and the test is accepted but evidence from African and Asian contexts is less conclusive. Recently it has been argued that acculturation may be amongst the most important factors influencing responses on personality scales like the NEO-PI-R, thereby influencing replicability of the FFM. Thus, this study explored the relationship between personality and acculturation using the NEO-PI-3 and the South African Acculturation Scale (SAAS) in a convenience sample of 272 South Africans in Johannesburg. Significant personality differences were found between acculturated and unacculturated individuals. With the exception of two Openness to Experience facets (Aesthetics and Values) and two Agreeableness facets (Straightforwardness and Compliance) significant agreement was found between the factor structures of acculturated and unacculturated individuals. These results are discussed within the context of the universality of the FFM and the NEO-PI-3 and the role of acculturation in this context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New voices in psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New voices in psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/1812-6371/1862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New voices in psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1812-6371/1862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人格五因素模型(FFM)和NEO-PI-R被认为是人格评估的金标准,所有其他测试都与之相比较。该模型和测试的普遍性已被接受,但来自非洲和亚洲背景的证据则不那么确凿。最近有人认为,文化适应可能是影响NEO-PI-R等人格量表反应的最重要因素之一,从而影响FFM的可复制性。因此,本研究利用NEO-PI-3和南非文化适应量表(SAAS)在约翰内斯堡的272名南非人的方便样本中探讨了人格与文化适应之间的关系。在适应文化和未适应文化的个体之间发现了显著的个性差异。除了两个经验开放性方面(美学和价值观)和两个宜人性方面(直率和顺从)外,适应文化个体和非适应文化个体的因素结构之间存在显著的一致性。这些结果在FFM和NEO-PI-3的普遍性以及文化适应在此背景下的作用的背景下进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND ACCULTURATION IN A COMMUNITY SAMPLE FROM JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA
The Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality and the NEO-PI-R are regarded as the gold standard in personality assessment against which all other tests are compared. The universality of both the model and the test is accepted but evidence from African and Asian contexts is less conclusive. Recently it has been argued that acculturation may be amongst the most important factors influencing responses on personality scales like the NEO-PI-R, thereby influencing replicability of the FFM. Thus, this study explored the relationship between personality and acculturation using the NEO-PI-3 and the South African Acculturation Scale (SAAS) in a convenience sample of 272 South Africans in Johannesburg. Significant personality differences were found between acculturated and unacculturated individuals. With the exception of two Openness to Experience facets (Aesthetics and Values) and two Agreeableness facets (Straightforwardness and Compliance) significant agreement was found between the factor structures of acculturated and unacculturated individuals. These results are discussed within the context of the universality of the FFM and the NEO-PI-3 and the role of acculturation in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信