敏捷团队质量度量模型的比较分析

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Manuela Silva, M. Perkusich, A. Freire, D. Albuquerque, Kyller Costa Gorgônio, H. Almeida, A. Perkusich, Everton T. Guimarães
{"title":"敏捷团队质量度量模型的比较分析","authors":"Manuela Silva, M. Perkusich, A. Freire, D. Albuquerque, Kyller Costa Gorgônio, H. Almeida, A. Perkusich, Everton T. Guimarães","doi":"10.24138/jcomss-2021-0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—Multiple models (or instruments) for measuring Teamwork Quality (TWQ) for Agile Software Development can be found in the literature. Regardless, such models have different constructs and measures, with no empirical evidence for comparing them. This study analyzed two agile TWQ models, resulting in equivalent results. We mapped the models’ variables given their definitions. We then collected data using both a Bayesian Network model, namely the TWQ-BN model, and Structural Equation Modeling, namely the TWQ-SEM model. We interviewed 162 team members from two software development companies. We analyzed the data using the Bland-Altman method. We obtained enough evidence to conclude that the results for Communication , Coordination , Cohesion and Mutual Support variables are not equivalent. On the other hand, we did not have enough evidence to claim that the models do not agree for measuring Effort and Balance of member contribution variables. The results of this study detail how two state-of-the-art agile TWQs compare in terms of their measures as well as potential research areas for further investigation.","PeriodicalId":38910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communications Software and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Agile Teamwork Quality Measurement Models\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Silva, M. Perkusich, A. Freire, D. Albuquerque, Kyller Costa Gorgônio, H. Almeida, A. Perkusich, Everton T. Guimarães\",\"doi\":\"10.24138/jcomss-2021-0177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"—Multiple models (or instruments) for measuring Teamwork Quality (TWQ) for Agile Software Development can be found in the literature. Regardless, such models have different constructs and measures, with no empirical evidence for comparing them. This study analyzed two agile TWQ models, resulting in equivalent results. We mapped the models’ variables given their definitions. We then collected data using both a Bayesian Network model, namely the TWQ-BN model, and Structural Equation Modeling, namely the TWQ-SEM model. We interviewed 162 team members from two software development companies. We analyzed the data using the Bland-Altman method. We obtained enough evidence to conclude that the results for Communication , Coordination , Cohesion and Mutual Support variables are not equivalent. On the other hand, we did not have enough evidence to claim that the models do not agree for measuring Effort and Balance of member contribution variables. The results of this study detail how two state-of-the-art agile TWQs compare in terms of their measures as well as potential research areas for further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communications Software and Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communications Software and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24138/jcomss-2021-0177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communications Software and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24138/jcomss-2021-0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献中可以找到用于测量敏捷软件开发团队质量(TWQ)的多种模型(或工具)。无论如何,这些模型有不同的结构和测量,没有经验证据来比较它们。本研究分析了两个敏捷TWQ模型,得到了等效的结果。我们根据模型变量的定义对其进行映射。然后,我们使用贝叶斯网络模型(即TWQ-BN模型)和结构方程模型(即TWQ-SEM模型)收集数据。我们采访了来自两家软件开发公司的162名团队成员。我们使用Bland-Altman方法分析数据。结果表明,交际、协调、衔接和相互支持四个变量的结果是不相等的。另一方面,我们没有足够的证据来证明模型不同意测量成员贡献变量的努力和平衡。这项研究的结果详细说明了两种最先进的敏捷twq在其度量方面的比较,以及进一步调查的潜在研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Agile Teamwork Quality Measurement Models
—Multiple models (or instruments) for measuring Teamwork Quality (TWQ) for Agile Software Development can be found in the literature. Regardless, such models have different constructs and measures, with no empirical evidence for comparing them. This study analyzed two agile TWQ models, resulting in equivalent results. We mapped the models’ variables given their definitions. We then collected data using both a Bayesian Network model, namely the TWQ-BN model, and Structural Equation Modeling, namely the TWQ-SEM model. We interviewed 162 team members from two software development companies. We analyzed the data using the Bland-Altman method. We obtained enough evidence to conclude that the results for Communication , Coordination , Cohesion and Mutual Support variables are not equivalent. On the other hand, we did not have enough evidence to claim that the models do not agree for measuring Effort and Balance of member contribution variables. The results of this study detail how two state-of-the-art agile TWQs compare in terms of their measures as well as potential research areas for further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communications Software and Systems
Journal of Communications Software and Systems Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信