土耳其刑法适用连续犯的条件

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Muhammed Demirel, Melik Kartal
{"title":"土耳其刑法适用连续犯的条件","authors":"Muhammed Demirel, Melik Kartal","doi":"10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The act is one of the most important elements for the existence of a crime in criminal law. In this respect, the number of acts has an impact upon the number of crimes. As a matter of fact the general rule in Turkish criminal law is that: the number of crimes is determined by the number of acts and the number of punishments is determined by the number of crimes. This is named as a real joinder rule. However, if this rule is applied without exception, some unfair consequences may occur. In order to prevent these unfair consequences, some exceptions are provided in the Turkish Penal Code. One of them is the regulation of the successive crime. Indeed, according to the provision of Turkish Penal Code (TPC) art. 43/1: where a person commits the same act, more than once, against the same person, at different times in the course of carrying out a decision to commit a crime, a single penalty shall be given. However, this punishment may be increased from one-fourth to three-fourths. Although the other institutions of criminal law are included in the penal codes of many countries, the successive crime is not provided in the penal codes of many countries. As a consequence, the studies about successive crime in foreign doctrines are limited. In this respect, our study is not only important in terms of the Turkish doctrine but also in terms of foreign doctrines. In this study, the conditions for the application of successive crime that is an exception of the real joinder rule were examined. While this issue was handled, the legal basement of successive crime was put forward and it was benefited from Turkish doctrine and Turkish court decisions.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Conditions for the Application of Successive Crime in the Turkish Criminal Code\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Demirel, Melik Kartal\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The act is one of the most important elements for the existence of a crime in criminal law. In this respect, the number of acts has an impact upon the number of crimes. As a matter of fact the general rule in Turkish criminal law is that: the number of crimes is determined by the number of acts and the number of punishments is determined by the number of crimes. This is named as a real joinder rule. However, if this rule is applied without exception, some unfair consequences may occur. In order to prevent these unfair consequences, some exceptions are provided in the Turkish Penal Code. One of them is the regulation of the successive crime. Indeed, according to the provision of Turkish Penal Code (TPC) art. 43/1: where a person commits the same act, more than once, against the same person, at different times in the course of carrying out a decision to commit a crime, a single penalty shall be given. However, this punishment may be increased from one-fourth to three-fourths. Although the other institutions of criminal law are included in the penal codes of many countries, the successive crime is not provided in the penal codes of many countries. As a consequence, the studies about successive crime in foreign doctrines are limited. In this respect, our study is not only important in terms of the Turkish doctrine but also in terms of foreign doctrines. In this study, the conditions for the application of successive crime that is an exception of the real joinder rule were examined. While this issue was handled, the legal basement of successive crime was put forward and it was benefited from Turkish doctrine and Turkish court decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在刑法中,行为是构成犯罪的最重要要件之一。在这方面,行为的数量对犯罪的数量有影响。事实上,土耳其刑法的一般规则是:罪行的数目由行为的数目决定,惩罚的数目由罪行的数目决定。这被命名为一个真正的合并规则。但是,如果毫无例外地适用这一规则,可能会产生一些不公平的后果。为了防止这些不公平的后果,《土耳其刑法》规定了一些例外情况。其中之一是对连续犯的规制。的确,根据《土耳其刑法典》第3条的规定。43/1:如果一个人在执行犯罪决定的过程中,在不同时间对同一人多次犯下同一行为,应给予单一处罚。但是,这种处罚可以从四分之一增加到四分之三。虽然许多国家的刑法典都包括了其他刑法制度,但许多国家的刑法典都没有规定连续犯。因此,国外理论对连续犯的研究十分有限。在这方面,我们的研究不仅在土耳其教义方面很重要,而且在外国教义方面也很重要。本研究考察了连续犯罪作为现实竞合规则的例外适用条件。在处理这一问题时,提出了接续犯罪的法理依据,并借鉴了土耳其的理论和土耳其法院的判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Conditions for the Application of Successive Crime in the Turkish Criminal Code
The act is one of the most important elements for the existence of a crime in criminal law. In this respect, the number of acts has an impact upon the number of crimes. As a matter of fact the general rule in Turkish criminal law is that: the number of crimes is determined by the number of acts and the number of punishments is determined by the number of crimes. This is named as a real joinder rule. However, if this rule is applied without exception, some unfair consequences may occur. In order to prevent these unfair consequences, some exceptions are provided in the Turkish Penal Code. One of them is the regulation of the successive crime. Indeed, according to the provision of Turkish Penal Code (TPC) art. 43/1: where a person commits the same act, more than once, against the same person, at different times in the course of carrying out a decision to commit a crime, a single penalty shall be given. However, this punishment may be increased from one-fourth to three-fourths. Although the other institutions of criminal law are included in the penal codes of many countries, the successive crime is not provided in the penal codes of many countries. As a consequence, the studies about successive crime in foreign doctrines are limited. In this respect, our study is not only important in terms of the Turkish doctrine but also in terms of foreign doctrines. In this study, the conditions for the application of successive crime that is an exception of the real joinder rule were examined. While this issue was handled, the legal basement of successive crime was put forward and it was benefited from Turkish doctrine and Turkish court decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信