María C. Scarpino, Erika C. Bosch, S. Hak, Camila Ruiz-Moreno, Brenda A. Salvatierra, Jorge I. Parras, Augusto P. Bayol
{"title":"主动脉解剖:胸片的真正诊断价值","authors":"María C. Scarpino, Erika C. Bosch, S. Hak, Camila Ruiz-Moreno, Brenda A. Salvatierra, Jorge I. Parras, Augusto P. Bayol","doi":"10.24875/rar.m22000009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"objective: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the radiological signs for aortic dissection (AD) and their applicability for the diagnosis, as well as to establish a cut-off value for left mediastinal width in AD and determine its sensitivity (S) and spe-cificity (E). Method: From a high complexity cardiovascular institute, 39 patients were selected and chest X-rays were perfor-med from August 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019. Selection criteria involved those who underwent computed tomography angio-graphy of thoracic aorta for clinical suspicion of AD. results: Within the sample, 72% were men (mean 63 years old), with hypertension as a most common risk factor. 43% of the patient had AD, 76% were type B. The mean maximum mediastinal width showed a difference of 1.5 cm between patients with AD and those without it. In contrast, the difference was 2 cm for the left mediastinal width. Maximum mediastinal width and left mediastinal width were statistically significant signs. Left mediastinal width presented good diagnostic capacity (area under the curve: 0.84). Cut-off point of 5.39 cm for the left mediastinal width was calculated (S: 82%; E: 77%). Finally, widening of the aortic knob, ascending/descending aorta or asymmetry between both showed to be statistically significant signs. Conclusions: Radiological signs for the diagnosis of AD was vali-dated. Also, a cut-off point for the left mediastinal width of 5.39 cm was found with a very good diagnostic capacity.","PeriodicalId":38131,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Radiologia","volume":"11655 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disección aórtica: verdadero valor diagnóstico de la radiografía de tórax\",\"authors\":\"María C. Scarpino, Erika C. Bosch, S. Hak, Camila Ruiz-Moreno, Brenda A. Salvatierra, Jorge I. Parras, Augusto P. Bayol\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/rar.m22000009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"objective: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the radiological signs for aortic dissection (AD) and their applicability for the diagnosis, as well as to establish a cut-off value for left mediastinal width in AD and determine its sensitivity (S) and spe-cificity (E). Method: From a high complexity cardiovascular institute, 39 patients were selected and chest X-rays were perfor-med from August 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019. Selection criteria involved those who underwent computed tomography angio-graphy of thoracic aorta for clinical suspicion of AD. results: Within the sample, 72% were men (mean 63 years old), with hypertension as a most common risk factor. 43% of the patient had AD, 76% were type B. The mean maximum mediastinal width showed a difference of 1.5 cm between patients with AD and those without it. In contrast, the difference was 2 cm for the left mediastinal width. Maximum mediastinal width and left mediastinal width were statistically significant signs. Left mediastinal width presented good diagnostic capacity (area under the curve: 0.84). Cut-off point of 5.39 cm for the left mediastinal width was calculated (S: 82%; E: 77%). Finally, widening of the aortic knob, ascending/descending aorta or asymmetry between both showed to be statistically significant signs. Conclusions: Radiological signs for the diagnosis of AD was vali-dated. Also, a cut-off point for the left mediastinal width of 5.39 cm was found with a very good diagnostic capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de Radiologia\",\"volume\":\"11655 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de Radiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/rar.m22000009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/rar.m22000009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价主动脉夹层(aortic dissection, AD)影像学征象的诊断能力及其诊断适用性,建立AD左纵隔宽度的临界值,确定其敏感性(S)和特异性(E)。方法:选取某高复杂性心血管研究所39例患者,于2018年8月1日至2019年2月1日行胸片检查。选择标准包括临床怀疑有AD的患者行胸主动脉ct血管造影。结果:在样本中,72%是男性(平均63岁),高血压是最常见的危险因素。AD患者占43%,其中b型占76%。AD患者与非AD患者的平均最大纵隔宽度相差1.5 cm。相比之下,左纵隔宽度的差异为2厘米。最大纵隔宽度和左纵隔宽度有统计学意义。左纵隔宽度具有较好的诊断能力(曲线下面积:0.84)。计算左侧纵隔宽度截断点为5.39 cm (S: 82%;艾凡:77%)。最后,主动脉旋钮变宽、升/降主动脉或两者不对称均为统计学上显著的征象。结论:影像学征象对AD的诊断是有效的。此外,左纵隔宽度的截断点为5.39 cm,具有很好的诊断能力。
Disección aórtica: verdadero valor diagnóstico de la radiografía de tórax
objective: To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the radiological signs for aortic dissection (AD) and their applicability for the diagnosis, as well as to establish a cut-off value for left mediastinal width in AD and determine its sensitivity (S) and spe-cificity (E). Method: From a high complexity cardiovascular institute, 39 patients were selected and chest X-rays were perfor-med from August 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019. Selection criteria involved those who underwent computed tomography angio-graphy of thoracic aorta for clinical suspicion of AD. results: Within the sample, 72% were men (mean 63 years old), with hypertension as a most common risk factor. 43% of the patient had AD, 76% were type B. The mean maximum mediastinal width showed a difference of 1.5 cm between patients with AD and those without it. In contrast, the difference was 2 cm for the left mediastinal width. Maximum mediastinal width and left mediastinal width were statistically significant signs. Left mediastinal width presented good diagnostic capacity (area under the curve: 0.84). Cut-off point of 5.39 cm for the left mediastinal width was calculated (S: 82%; E: 77%). Finally, widening of the aortic knob, ascending/descending aorta or asymmetry between both showed to be statistically significant signs. Conclusions: Radiological signs for the diagnosis of AD was vali-dated. Also, a cut-off point for the left mediastinal width of 5.39 cm was found with a very good diagnostic capacity.