芝加哥评论文章

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS
CHICAGO REVIEW Pub Date : 2001-12-22 DOI:10.2307/25304801
Stan Brakhage
{"title":"芝加哥评论文章","authors":"Stan Brakhage","doi":"10.2307/25304801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many living poets who inspire my life, whose work I enjoy as a regularity in my living, but there are three, right now, who contribute directly to my filmmaking as powerfully as Pound, Stein, Olson, Creeley, Dorn when I was young (*) (as powerfully as \"the ancients\" of the craft whose poems form a basis for my, and everyone else's, English-language being): these three today are Michael McClure, Ronald Johnson, and Lisa Jarnot. McClure's aesthetic evolution has, since the friendship in our early twenties, always seemed consonant with mine--i.e., his words worn as if \"on the sleeve\" of his physical being (much as I see my filmed images as extensions of my optic system, and then later my whole body as mentor to that system. Finally now the medium itself, the muse, as it were, becomes outlet for my nerve system's most hidden sparking innards). McClure always, and more and more as he grows older, gives his reader access to the verbal impulses of his whole body's thought (as distinct from simply and only brain-think, as it is with most who write). He invents a form for these cellular messages of his, a form which will feel as if it were organic on the page; and he sticks with it across his life \"like a solid moving through an inferno.\" I too stick with the given window of film, the slightly variable rectangle of film's-frame; and I (however much I admire D. W. Griffith's varieties of frames) adhere to that widening beam of projector ligh t and its rectangle of eye's composed feed-back--this \"the stage\" for sharing the anomalies of my visual privacy... (only exception, the Purgation sequence of The Dante Quartet, in cinemascope for its \"widening gyre\" of transformation, as Yeats would have it): and my display of visions (like Michael's enverbaled vision) come to the film window (\"the page\"?) directly from my physical self, the rhythms and tones of my biological response, my very breath and organic breadth of being. Few poets have managed to complete an epic poem in our Time: Pound's Cantos are left undone, trailing off in a ragged stitch of lines more emblematic of the social Times of their post-WW II writing then integrally related to the whole poem; Olson also leaves a lovely \"garland,\" as it were, of variants upon the themes of Maximus Dr. W. C. Williams also veering off Patterson into the variant greatness of Desert Music; H. D. coming-to-rest but not to a thematic conclusion of Helen In Egypt. The only completed epic poetics of the twentieth century I personally accept-as-such are those of Louis Zukofsky, his \"A\", Gertrude Stein, her Stanzas in Meditation, possibly completed, although one wonders (in the light of Ulla Dydo's monumental research) if the terrible quarrel between Alice Toklas and Gertrude didn't shift the poem radically away from its pristine linguistic beginnings into the more narrative drama of their irresolvable argument. Finally, for me then, we have Ronald Johnson's ARK, miraculously finished a couple years before his death. This work, more than any epic (since Pound's Cantos inspired my film Dog Star Man), has directly engendered a reciprocal epic film, the Vancouver Island Trilogy: I stood at times waist deep in ocean reading the typewritten (unpublished at that time) continuance (past ARK 50) of the poem which Ronald was kind enough to send me. The full poem had been printed (with a verbal description of myself enoceaned) by the time 8 years later when I was photographing the third section of my film. Ronald and I are both from Kansas, as is Michael McClure (all three of us growing up within a hundred square miles of each other): from those \"grounds\" Ronald manages linguistic landscapes which finally encompass the Western world, its history coming down finally (as in a child's Vision) to the exactitudes of that geography and biology before, and being one with, the eyes and ears of the poet's language--an imaginary multiple series of recognitions of \"real toads\" (as Marianne Moore would have it) inhabiting the grain-growing (under inverted blue bowl of sky) flats of Kansas. …","PeriodicalId":42508,"journal":{"name":"CHICAGO REVIEW","volume":"47 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25304801","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chicago Review Article\",\"authors\":\"Stan Brakhage\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/25304801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many living poets who inspire my life, whose work I enjoy as a regularity in my living, but there are three, right now, who contribute directly to my filmmaking as powerfully as Pound, Stein, Olson, Creeley, Dorn when I was young (*) (as powerfully as \\\"the ancients\\\" of the craft whose poems form a basis for my, and everyone else's, English-language being): these three today are Michael McClure, Ronald Johnson, and Lisa Jarnot. McClure's aesthetic evolution has, since the friendship in our early twenties, always seemed consonant with mine--i.e., his words worn as if \\\"on the sleeve\\\" of his physical being (much as I see my filmed images as extensions of my optic system, and then later my whole body as mentor to that system. Finally now the medium itself, the muse, as it were, becomes outlet for my nerve system's most hidden sparking innards). McClure always, and more and more as he grows older, gives his reader access to the verbal impulses of his whole body's thought (as distinct from simply and only brain-think, as it is with most who write). He invents a form for these cellular messages of his, a form which will feel as if it were organic on the page; and he sticks with it across his life \\\"like a solid moving through an inferno.\\\" I too stick with the given window of film, the slightly variable rectangle of film's-frame; and I (however much I admire D. W. Griffith's varieties of frames) adhere to that widening beam of projector ligh t and its rectangle of eye's composed feed-back--this \\\"the stage\\\" for sharing the anomalies of my visual privacy... (only exception, the Purgation sequence of The Dante Quartet, in cinemascope for its \\\"widening gyre\\\" of transformation, as Yeats would have it): and my display of visions (like Michael's enverbaled vision) come to the film window (\\\"the page\\\"?) directly from my physical self, the rhythms and tones of my biological response, my very breath and organic breadth of being. Few poets have managed to complete an epic poem in our Time: Pound's Cantos are left undone, trailing off in a ragged stitch of lines more emblematic of the social Times of their post-WW II writing then integrally related to the whole poem; Olson also leaves a lovely \\\"garland,\\\" as it were, of variants upon the themes of Maximus Dr. W. C. Williams also veering off Patterson into the variant greatness of Desert Music; H. D. coming-to-rest but not to a thematic conclusion of Helen In Egypt. The only completed epic poetics of the twentieth century I personally accept-as-such are those of Louis Zukofsky, his \\\"A\\\", Gertrude Stein, her Stanzas in Meditation, possibly completed, although one wonders (in the light of Ulla Dydo's monumental research) if the terrible quarrel between Alice Toklas and Gertrude didn't shift the poem radically away from its pristine linguistic beginnings into the more narrative drama of their irresolvable argument. Finally, for me then, we have Ronald Johnson's ARK, miraculously finished a couple years before his death. This work, more than any epic (since Pound's Cantos inspired my film Dog Star Man), has directly engendered a reciprocal epic film, the Vancouver Island Trilogy: I stood at times waist deep in ocean reading the typewritten (unpublished at that time) continuance (past ARK 50) of the poem which Ronald was kind enough to send me. The full poem had been printed (with a verbal description of myself enoceaned) by the time 8 years later when I was photographing the third section of my film. Ronald and I are both from Kansas, as is Michael McClure (all three of us growing up within a hundred square miles of each other): from those \\\"grounds\\\" Ronald manages linguistic landscapes which finally encompass the Western world, its history coming down finally (as in a child's Vision) to the exactitudes of that geography and biology before, and being one with, the eyes and ears of the poet's language--an imaginary multiple series of recognitions of \\\"real toads\\\" (as Marianne Moore would have it) inhabiting the grain-growing (under inverted blue bowl of sky) flats of Kansas. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":42508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHICAGO REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25304801\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHICAGO REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/25304801\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY REVIEWS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHICAGO REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/25304801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有许多在世的诗人启发了我的生活,我把他们的作品当作生活的一部分来欣赏,但现在有三位诗人直接对我的电影制作做出了巨大的贡献,就像我年轻时的庞德、斯坦、奥尔森、克里利和多恩一样(就像这门手艺的“古人”一样,他们的诗歌为我和其他人的英语生活奠定了基础):这三位是迈克尔·麦克卢尔、罗纳德·约翰逊和丽莎·贾诺特。自从我们二十出头的友谊以来,麦克卢尔的审美演变似乎总是与我的一致。他的话就像“穿在袖子上”一样(就像我把我拍摄的影像看作我的视觉系统的延伸,然后把我的整个身体看作那个系统的导师一样)。最后,媒介本身,缪斯,可以说,成为了我神经系统最隐蔽的内部火花的出口)。随着年龄的增长,麦克卢尔总是(而且越来越多地)让读者接触到他整个身体思想的语言冲动(这与大多数作家的简单思维截然不同)。他为他的这些细胞信息发明了一种形式,一种在纸上感觉像是有机的形式;他一生都坚持着它,“就像一个穿过地狱的固体。”我也固守着给定的胶片窗口,胶卷框架的矩形略有变化;而我(无论我多么欣赏d·w·格里菲斯(d.w. Griffith)的各种画框)坚持使用投影仪不断扩大的光束和它的矩形眼睛组成的反馈——这是分享我视觉隐私异常的“舞台”……(唯一的例外是《但丁四重奏》(the Dante Quartet)中的“净化”(puration)片段,在电影院里,正如叶芝所说的那样,它“不断扩大的环流”发生了转变):我的视觉展示(就像迈克尔的语言化视觉一样)直接从我的身体自我、我的生物反应的节奏和音调、我的呼吸和存在的有机广度来到电影窗口(“页面”?)在我们这个时代,很少有诗人能够完成一首史诗:庞德的《诗章》没有被完成,在一段支离破碎的线条中逐渐消失,这些线条更象征着他们二战后的社会时代,然后与整首诗完整地联系在一起;奥尔森还留下了一个可爱的“花环”,可以说,是马克西姆斯·w·c·威廉姆斯博士的主题的变体,也从帕特森转向了沙漠音乐的变体伟大;h。d。安息了,但没有得出《海伦在埃及》的主题结论。我个人接受的二十世纪唯一完成的史诗是路易斯·祖可夫斯基的作品,他的“A”,格特鲁德·斯坦,她的《沉思诗节》,可能已经完成了,尽管有人想知道(根据乌拉·迪多不朽的研究)爱丽丝·托克拉斯和格特鲁德之间的可怕争吵是否没有从根本上改变这首诗从原始的语言开始进入他们无法解决的争论的更叙事的戏剧。最后,对我来说,我们有罗纳德·约翰逊的方舟,奇迹般地在他去世前几年完成。这部作品比任何史诗作品都重要(因为庞德的《诗章》启发了我的电影《狗星人》),它直接催生了一部与之相呼应的史诗电影《温哥华岛三部曲》:我有时站在齐腰深的海洋里,阅读罗纳德好心送给我的那首诗(在方舟50号之后)的打字(当时尚未出版)续篇。八年后,当我拍摄我的电影的第三部分时,整首诗已经印刷出来(加上对我自己的口头描述)。罗纳德和我都来自堪萨斯州,迈克尔·麦克卢尔也是如此(我们三个人都在相距不到100平方英里的地方长大)。罗纳德从这些“基础”出发,管理着最终包含西方世界的语言景观,它的历史最终(就像在一个孩子的视野中一样)向下延伸到地理学和生物学之前的精确,并与诗人语言的眼睛和耳朵合而为一——对居住在堪萨斯州(在倒立的蓝色天空下)种植谷物的平原上的“真正的蟾蜍”(玛丽安·摩尔会这么说)的一系列想象的认识。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chicago Review Article
There are many living poets who inspire my life, whose work I enjoy as a regularity in my living, but there are three, right now, who contribute directly to my filmmaking as powerfully as Pound, Stein, Olson, Creeley, Dorn when I was young (*) (as powerfully as "the ancients" of the craft whose poems form a basis for my, and everyone else's, English-language being): these three today are Michael McClure, Ronald Johnson, and Lisa Jarnot. McClure's aesthetic evolution has, since the friendship in our early twenties, always seemed consonant with mine--i.e., his words worn as if "on the sleeve" of his physical being (much as I see my filmed images as extensions of my optic system, and then later my whole body as mentor to that system. Finally now the medium itself, the muse, as it were, becomes outlet for my nerve system's most hidden sparking innards). McClure always, and more and more as he grows older, gives his reader access to the verbal impulses of his whole body's thought (as distinct from simply and only brain-think, as it is with most who write). He invents a form for these cellular messages of his, a form which will feel as if it were organic on the page; and he sticks with it across his life "like a solid moving through an inferno." I too stick with the given window of film, the slightly variable rectangle of film's-frame; and I (however much I admire D. W. Griffith's varieties of frames) adhere to that widening beam of projector ligh t and its rectangle of eye's composed feed-back--this "the stage" for sharing the anomalies of my visual privacy... (only exception, the Purgation sequence of The Dante Quartet, in cinemascope for its "widening gyre" of transformation, as Yeats would have it): and my display of visions (like Michael's enverbaled vision) come to the film window ("the page"?) directly from my physical self, the rhythms and tones of my biological response, my very breath and organic breadth of being. Few poets have managed to complete an epic poem in our Time: Pound's Cantos are left undone, trailing off in a ragged stitch of lines more emblematic of the social Times of their post-WW II writing then integrally related to the whole poem; Olson also leaves a lovely "garland," as it were, of variants upon the themes of Maximus Dr. W. C. Williams also veering off Patterson into the variant greatness of Desert Music; H. D. coming-to-rest but not to a thematic conclusion of Helen In Egypt. The only completed epic poetics of the twentieth century I personally accept-as-such are those of Louis Zukofsky, his "A", Gertrude Stein, her Stanzas in Meditation, possibly completed, although one wonders (in the light of Ulla Dydo's monumental research) if the terrible quarrel between Alice Toklas and Gertrude didn't shift the poem radically away from its pristine linguistic beginnings into the more narrative drama of their irresolvable argument. Finally, for me then, we have Ronald Johnson's ARK, miraculously finished a couple years before his death. This work, more than any epic (since Pound's Cantos inspired my film Dog Star Man), has directly engendered a reciprocal epic film, the Vancouver Island Trilogy: I stood at times waist deep in ocean reading the typewritten (unpublished at that time) continuance (past ARK 50) of the poem which Ronald was kind enough to send me. The full poem had been printed (with a verbal description of myself enoceaned) by the time 8 years later when I was photographing the third section of my film. Ronald and I are both from Kansas, as is Michael McClure (all three of us growing up within a hundred square miles of each other): from those "grounds" Ronald manages linguistic landscapes which finally encompass the Western world, its history coming down finally (as in a child's Vision) to the exactitudes of that geography and biology before, and being one with, the eyes and ears of the poet's language--an imaginary multiple series of recognitions of "real toads" (as Marianne Moore would have it) inhabiting the grain-growing (under inverted blue bowl of sky) flats of Kansas. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHICAGO REVIEW
CHICAGO REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: In the back issues room down the hall from Chicago Review’s offices on the third floor of Lillie House sit hundreds of unread magazines, yearning to see the light of day. These historic issues from the Chicago Review archives may now be ordered online with a credit card (via CCNow). Some of them are groundbreaking anthologies, others outstanding general issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信