{"title":"青少年早期心理空间界限与交际容忍度","authors":"","doi":"10.26565/2225-7756-2020-68-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The link between psychological boundaries and the tolerance of adolescents is analyzed. It is mentioned, that the level of tolerance of different people is different and depends on some factors and is characterized by various types according to the object of tolerance-intolerance: ethnic (to another ethnicity), confessional (to another religion), intercultural (to another culture), gender (to another gender), sexual (to another sexual orientation), medical (to another state of health), age (to another age), class (to another social group). This investigation is concentrated on communicative tolerance highlighted by V. Boiko. The scientist underlines that a person with a high level of communicative tolerance is characterized by the ability to communicate with different people, creating a psychologically comfortable environment for collaboration. The lack or low level of communicative tolerance impedes successful communication in the social, professional or domestic sphere. The author identifies several categories of communicative tolerance: situational, manifested as a personal attitude to a particular person; typological, manifested in an individual or group of a certain type people (nationality, race, social group); professional, manifested between participants in the relationship in the professional field; general communicative tolerance. The hypothesis about the dependence of the level of communicative tolerance on the characteristics of personal boundaries was confirmed. It has been found that adolescents are mostly marked by thin boundaries of psychological space and average distance from others. It has been researched that middle and high levels of communicative tolerance are predominantly characteristic of adolescents. It is noted that the level of communicative tolerance of students meets the requirements of the future profession. Three types of border carriers with their features are considered. It has been found that “open” young people are characterized by a higher level of communicative tolerance than “closed” ones.","PeriodicalId":52798,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSYCHOLOGICAL SPACE BAUNDARIES AND COMMUNICATIVE TOLERANCE OF EARLY ADOLESCENTS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.26565/2225-7756-2020-68-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The link between psychological boundaries and the tolerance of adolescents is analyzed. It is mentioned, that the level of tolerance of different people is different and depends on some factors and is characterized by various types according to the object of tolerance-intolerance: ethnic (to another ethnicity), confessional (to another religion), intercultural (to another culture), gender (to another gender), sexual (to another sexual orientation), medical (to another state of health), age (to another age), class (to another social group). This investigation is concentrated on communicative tolerance highlighted by V. Boiko. The scientist underlines that a person with a high level of communicative tolerance is characterized by the ability to communicate with different people, creating a psychologically comfortable environment for collaboration. The lack or low level of communicative tolerance impedes successful communication in the social, professional or domestic sphere. The author identifies several categories of communicative tolerance: situational, manifested as a personal attitude to a particular person; typological, manifested in an individual or group of a certain type people (nationality, race, social group); professional, manifested between participants in the relationship in the professional field; general communicative tolerance. The hypothesis about the dependence of the level of communicative tolerance on the characteristics of personal boundaries was confirmed. It has been found that adolescents are mostly marked by thin boundaries of psychological space and average distance from others. It has been researched that middle and high levels of communicative tolerance are predominantly characteristic of adolescents. It is noted that the level of communicative tolerance of students meets the requirements of the future profession. Three types of border carriers with their features are considered. It has been found that “open” young people are characterized by a higher level of communicative tolerance than “closed” ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2020-68-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2020-68-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PSYCHOLOGICAL SPACE BAUNDARIES AND COMMUNICATIVE TOLERANCE OF EARLY ADOLESCENTS
The link between psychological boundaries and the tolerance of adolescents is analyzed. It is mentioned, that the level of tolerance of different people is different and depends on some factors and is characterized by various types according to the object of tolerance-intolerance: ethnic (to another ethnicity), confessional (to another religion), intercultural (to another culture), gender (to another gender), sexual (to another sexual orientation), medical (to another state of health), age (to another age), class (to another social group). This investigation is concentrated on communicative tolerance highlighted by V. Boiko. The scientist underlines that a person with a high level of communicative tolerance is characterized by the ability to communicate with different people, creating a psychologically comfortable environment for collaboration. The lack or low level of communicative tolerance impedes successful communication in the social, professional or domestic sphere. The author identifies several categories of communicative tolerance: situational, manifested as a personal attitude to a particular person; typological, manifested in an individual or group of a certain type people (nationality, race, social group); professional, manifested between participants in the relationship in the professional field; general communicative tolerance. The hypothesis about the dependence of the level of communicative tolerance on the characteristics of personal boundaries was confirmed. It has been found that adolescents are mostly marked by thin boundaries of psychological space and average distance from others. It has been researched that middle and high levels of communicative tolerance are predominantly characteristic of adolescents. It is noted that the level of communicative tolerance of students meets the requirements of the future profession. Three types of border carriers with their features are considered. It has been found that “open” young people are characterized by a higher level of communicative tolerance than “closed” ones.