{"title":"共同利益和遗憾突出对逃税的影响","authors":"Amy M. Hageman","doi":"10.2308/ATAX-10478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"B rink and White (2015) examine individual tax compliance and whether (1) a shared interest in the consequences of evasion, and (2) regret salience of a potential adverse audit influence tax compliance decisions. Given the vast amount of potential revenue lost each year due to taxpayer noncompliance, understanding the root causes of tax compliance decisions has important practical implications. Extant research on individual tax compliance has examined both economic factors (Allingham and Sandmo 1972), as well as non-economic factors such as ethical decision-making (Alm and Torgler 2011). However, previous research has not examined the effects of a shared interest in the consequences of a tax compliance decision, nor the influence of a shared interest under differing degrees of regret salience. To investigate the influence of a shared interest and regret salience on tax compliance decisions, Brink and White (2015) conduct an experiment using 147 experienced taxpayers as participants. Participants are assigned to conditions with either the presence (partner in a partnership) or absence (sole proprietor) of a shared interest, and either the presence (regret frame) or absence (control frame) of heightened awareness of regret. Results indicate that tax compliance is more likely when a shared interest is presence, as well as when regret salience is primed; however, there is not a significant interaction between the presence/absence of a shared interest and regret salience. Supplemental analysis indicates that tax evasion is judged to be more unethical when a shared interest is present than when it is absent, and that the emotional costs of tax evasion are higher in the presence of a shared interest. Brink and White (2015) contribute to the tax compliance literature in several important ways. Specifically, given the prevalence of a shared interest in the consequences of tax evasion (such as through partnerships and S corporations), surprisingly little is known about how the presence of a shared interest may influence tax compliance decisions. This study provides an excellent first step in","PeriodicalId":45477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of a Shared Interest and Regret Salience on Tax Evasion\",\"authors\":\"Amy M. Hageman\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ATAX-10478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"B rink and White (2015) examine individual tax compliance and whether (1) a shared interest in the consequences of evasion, and (2) regret salience of a potential adverse audit influence tax compliance decisions. Given the vast amount of potential revenue lost each year due to taxpayer noncompliance, understanding the root causes of tax compliance decisions has important practical implications. Extant research on individual tax compliance has examined both economic factors (Allingham and Sandmo 1972), as well as non-economic factors such as ethical decision-making (Alm and Torgler 2011). However, previous research has not examined the effects of a shared interest in the consequences of a tax compliance decision, nor the influence of a shared interest under differing degrees of regret salience. To investigate the influence of a shared interest and regret salience on tax compliance decisions, Brink and White (2015) conduct an experiment using 147 experienced taxpayers as participants. Participants are assigned to conditions with either the presence (partner in a partnership) or absence (sole proprietor) of a shared interest, and either the presence (regret frame) or absence (control frame) of heightened awareness of regret. Results indicate that tax compliance is more likely when a shared interest is presence, as well as when regret salience is primed; however, there is not a significant interaction between the presence/absence of a shared interest and regret salience. Supplemental analysis indicates that tax evasion is judged to be more unethical when a shared interest is present than when it is absent, and that the emotional costs of tax evasion are higher in the presence of a shared interest. Brink and White (2015) contribute to the tax compliance literature in several important ways. Specifically, given the prevalence of a shared interest in the consequences of tax evasion (such as through partnerships and S corporations), surprisingly little is known about how the presence of a shared interest may influence tax compliance decisions. This study provides an excellent first step in\",\"PeriodicalId\":45477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Taxation Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Taxation Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ATAX-10478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ATAX-10478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
B rink和White(2015)研究了个人税务合规性,以及(1)对逃税后果的共同利益,以及(2)对潜在不利审计影响税务合规决策的遗憾突出性。鉴于每年由于纳税人不合规而造成的巨额潜在收入损失,了解税务合规决策的根本原因具有重要的实际意义。现有的关于个人纳税合规性的研究既考察了经济因素(Allingham and Sandmo 1972),也考察了非经济因素,如道德决策(Alm and Torgler 2011)。然而,之前的研究并没有考察共同利益对税务合规决策后果的影响,也没有考察共同利益在不同程度的遗憾突出下的影响。为了调查共同利益和遗憾突出对税务合规决策的影响,Brink和White(2015)进行了一项实验,使用147名经验丰富的纳税人作为参与者。参与者被分配到两种情况,一种是存在(合伙企业的合伙人),另一种是不存在(独资经营者)共同利益,另一种是存在(后悔框架)或不存在(控制框架)对后悔的高度意识。结果表明,当共同利益存在时,以及当后悔显著性启动时,纳税遵从的可能性更大;然而,在共同兴趣的存在/缺失与遗憾显著性之间没有显著的相互作用。补充分析表明,当存在共同利益时,逃税被认为比没有共同利益时更不道德,并且在存在共同利益时,逃税的情感成本更高。Brink和White(2015)在几个重要方面为税收合规文献做出了贡献。具体来说,鉴于共同利益普遍存在于逃税的后果中(例如通过合伙企业和S公司),令人惊讶的是,人们对共同利益的存在如何影响税务合规决策知之甚少。这项研究提供了一个很好的第一步
The Effects of a Shared Interest and Regret Salience on Tax Evasion
B rink and White (2015) examine individual tax compliance and whether (1) a shared interest in the consequences of evasion, and (2) regret salience of a potential adverse audit influence tax compliance decisions. Given the vast amount of potential revenue lost each year due to taxpayer noncompliance, understanding the root causes of tax compliance decisions has important practical implications. Extant research on individual tax compliance has examined both economic factors (Allingham and Sandmo 1972), as well as non-economic factors such as ethical decision-making (Alm and Torgler 2011). However, previous research has not examined the effects of a shared interest in the consequences of a tax compliance decision, nor the influence of a shared interest under differing degrees of regret salience. To investigate the influence of a shared interest and regret salience on tax compliance decisions, Brink and White (2015) conduct an experiment using 147 experienced taxpayers as participants. Participants are assigned to conditions with either the presence (partner in a partnership) or absence (sole proprietor) of a shared interest, and either the presence (regret frame) or absence (control frame) of heightened awareness of regret. Results indicate that tax compliance is more likely when a shared interest is presence, as well as when regret salience is primed; however, there is not a significant interaction between the presence/absence of a shared interest and regret salience. Supplemental analysis indicates that tax evasion is judged to be more unethical when a shared interest is present than when it is absent, and that the emotional costs of tax evasion are higher in the presence of a shared interest. Brink and White (2015) contribute to the tax compliance literature in several important ways. Specifically, given the prevalence of a shared interest in the consequences of tax evasion (such as through partnerships and S corporations), surprisingly little is known about how the presence of a shared interest may influence tax compliance decisions. This study provides an excellent first step in