可持续发展报告中的印象管理:图表使用的实证调查

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Charles H. Cho, Giovanna Michelon, Dennis M. Patten
{"title":"可持续发展报告中的印象管理:图表使用的实证调查","authors":"Charles H. Cho, Giovanna Michelon, Dennis M. Patten","doi":"10.2308/APIN-10249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether firms use graphs in their sustainability reports in order to present a more favorable view of their social and environmental performance. Further, because prior research indicates that companies use social and environmental disclosure as a tool to reduce their exposure to social and political pressures (the legitimacy argument), we also examine whether differences in the extent of impression management are associated with differences in social and environmental performance. Based on an analysis of graphs in sustainability reports for a sample of 77 U.S. companies for 2006, we find considerable evidence of favorable selectivity bias in the choice of items graphed, and moderate evidence that where distortion in graphing occurs, it also has a favorable bias. Our results regarding the relation between impression management and performance are mixed. Whereas we find that graphs of social items in sustainability reports for companies with worse socia...","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":"75 1","pages":"16-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2308/APIN-10249","citationCount":"195","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impression Management in Sustainability Reports: An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Graphs\",\"authors\":\"Charles H. Cho, Giovanna Michelon, Dennis M. Patten\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/APIN-10249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether firms use graphs in their sustainability reports in order to present a more favorable view of their social and environmental performance. Further, because prior research indicates that companies use social and environmental disclosure as a tool to reduce their exposure to social and political pressures (the legitimacy argument), we also examine whether differences in the extent of impression management are associated with differences in social and environmental performance. Based on an analysis of graphs in sustainability reports for a sample of 77 U.S. companies for 2006, we find considerable evidence of favorable selectivity bias in the choice of items graphed, and moderate evidence that where distortion in graphing occurs, it also has a favorable bias. Our results regarding the relation between impression management and performance are mixed. Whereas we find that graphs of social items in sustainability reports for companies with worse socia...\",\"PeriodicalId\":38883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting and the Public Interest\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"16-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2308/APIN-10249\",\"citationCount\":\"195\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting and the Public Interest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/APIN-10249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/APIN-10249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 195

摘要

摘要:本文旨在探讨企业在其可持续发展报告中是否使用图表来展示其社会和环境绩效。此外,由于先前的研究表明,公司将社会和环境信息披露作为减少社会和政治压力的工具(合法性论点),我们还研究了印象管理程度的差异是否与社会和环境绩效的差异有关。基于对2006年77家美国公司样本的可持续发展报告中的图表的分析,我们发现了相当多的证据表明,在图表项目的选择中存在有利的选择性偏差,并且适度的证据表明,在图表发生扭曲的地方,它也有有利的偏差。关于印象管理和绩效之间的关系,我们的结果是混合的。然而,我们发现,对于社会状况较差的公司,可持续发展报告中的社会项目图表……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impression Management in Sustainability Reports: An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Graphs
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether firms use graphs in their sustainability reports in order to present a more favorable view of their social and environmental performance. Further, because prior research indicates that companies use social and environmental disclosure as a tool to reduce their exposure to social and political pressures (the legitimacy argument), we also examine whether differences in the extent of impression management are associated with differences in social and environmental performance. Based on an analysis of graphs in sustainability reports for a sample of 77 U.S. companies for 2006, we find considerable evidence of favorable selectivity bias in the choice of items graphed, and moderate evidence that where distortion in graphing occurs, it also has a favorable bias. Our results regarding the relation between impression management and performance are mixed. Whereas we find that graphs of social items in sustainability reports for companies with worse socia...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信