基于社区的洪水风险管理的经济效率:来自印度尼西亚的实证研究

Q2 Social Sciences
L. Sedyowati, G. Chandrarin, G. I. Nugraha, B. Nugroho
{"title":"基于社区的洪水风险管理的经济效率:来自印度尼西亚的实证研究","authors":"L. Sedyowati, G. Chandrarin, G. I. Nugraha, B. Nugroho","doi":"10.24425/JWLD.2020.134214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flood risk management are considerably influenced by several factors, such as all sources of flooding, social circumstances, policy and even the potential for local economic growth. To encourage government, business, community and other parties to continue investing in flood risk management projects, it is necessary to give understanding that the projects can also provide economic benefits through systematic predictions and assessments of costs, benefits and social values, especially on flood-affected communities. This study aims: (1) to develop knowledge and understanding on small-scale flood risk management project in Malang City, Indonesia, and; (2) to assess the economic efficiency of the project investment considering all benefits, both monetary and non-monetary. The research method is a mixed method combining quantitative questionnaires (N = 53 from 162 families) with qualitative in-depth interviews (N = 10) and field observations. The runoff discharge and the inundation depth were calculated using hydrology and hydraulic analysis, while the economic efficiency was analysed using cost benefit analysis (CBA). The results show that the community-based flood risk management system can reduce the flood risk up to 30% compared to before the implementation of that system. This system also provides direct financial benefits through the use of drainage channels for fish and vegetables farming. It causes the increase of the net social benefit about 70–90% and the net present value (NPV) greater than zero (NPV > 0). Therefore, the project investment is recommended to be proceeded.","PeriodicalId":39224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water and Land Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic efficiency of community-based flood risk management: An empirical study from Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"L. Sedyowati, G. Chandrarin, G. I. Nugraha, B. Nugroho\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/JWLD.2020.134214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flood risk management are considerably influenced by several factors, such as all sources of flooding, social circumstances, policy and even the potential for local economic growth. To encourage government, business, community and other parties to continue investing in flood risk management projects, it is necessary to give understanding that the projects can also provide economic benefits through systematic predictions and assessments of costs, benefits and social values, especially on flood-affected communities. This study aims: (1) to develop knowledge and understanding on small-scale flood risk management project in Malang City, Indonesia, and; (2) to assess the economic efficiency of the project investment considering all benefits, both monetary and non-monetary. The research method is a mixed method combining quantitative questionnaires (N = 53 from 162 families) with qualitative in-depth interviews (N = 10) and field observations. The runoff discharge and the inundation depth were calculated using hydrology and hydraulic analysis, while the economic efficiency was analysed using cost benefit analysis (CBA). The results show that the community-based flood risk management system can reduce the flood risk up to 30% compared to before the implementation of that system. This system also provides direct financial benefits through the use of drainage channels for fish and vegetables farming. It causes the increase of the net social benefit about 70–90% and the net present value (NPV) greater than zero (NPV > 0). Therefore, the project investment is recommended to be proceeded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water and Land Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water and Land Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/JWLD.2020.134214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water and Land Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/JWLD.2020.134214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

洪水风险管理在很大程度上受到几个因素的影响,例如洪水的所有来源、社会环境、政策,甚至是当地经济增长的潜力。为了鼓励政府、企业、社区和其他各方继续投资于洪水风险管理项目,有必要让人们认识到,通过系统地预测和评估成本、效益和社会价值,这些项目也可以带来经济效益,特别是对受洪水影响的社区。本研究旨在:(1)增进对印尼玛琅市小规模洪水风险管理项目的认识和理解;(2)综合考虑货币效益和非货币效益,对项目投资的经济效益进行评价。研究方法采用定量问卷(162个家庭53份)、定性深度访谈(10份)和实地观察相结合的混合方法。采用水文学和水力分析计算径流流量和淹没深度,采用成本效益分析(CBA)分析经济效益。结果表明,与实施社区洪水风险管理系统前相比,社区洪水风险管理系统可将洪水风险降低30%。该系统还通过利用排水沟种植鱼类和蔬菜,提供直接的经济效益。使净社会效益提高70-90%左右,净现值(NPV)大于零(NPV > 0),建议继续进行项目投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic efficiency of community-based flood risk management: An empirical study from Indonesia
Flood risk management are considerably influenced by several factors, such as all sources of flooding, social circumstances, policy and even the potential for local economic growth. To encourage government, business, community and other parties to continue investing in flood risk management projects, it is necessary to give understanding that the projects can also provide economic benefits through systematic predictions and assessments of costs, benefits and social values, especially on flood-affected communities. This study aims: (1) to develop knowledge and understanding on small-scale flood risk management project in Malang City, Indonesia, and; (2) to assess the economic efficiency of the project investment considering all benefits, both monetary and non-monetary. The research method is a mixed method combining quantitative questionnaires (N = 53 from 162 families) with qualitative in-depth interviews (N = 10) and field observations. The runoff discharge and the inundation depth were calculated using hydrology and hydraulic analysis, while the economic efficiency was analysed using cost benefit analysis (CBA). The results show that the community-based flood risk management system can reduce the flood risk up to 30% compared to before the implementation of that system. This system also provides direct financial benefits through the use of drainage channels for fish and vegetables farming. It causes the increase of the net social benefit about 70–90% and the net present value (NPV) greater than zero (NPV > 0). Therefore, the project investment is recommended to be proceeded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Water and Land Development
Journal of Water and Land Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Land Development - is a peer reviewed research journal published in English. Journal has been published continually since 1998. From 2013, the journal is published quarterly in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter. In 2011 and 2012 the journal was published twice a year, and between 1998 and 2010 it was published as a yearbook. . Papers may report the results of experiments, theoretical analyses, design of machines and mechanization systems, processes or processing methods, new materials, new measurements methods or new ideas in information technology. Topics: engineering and development of the agricultural environment, water managment in rural areas and protection of water resources, natural and economic functions of grassland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信