为什么人力资本的标准衡量具有误导性

E. Hanushek
{"title":"为什么人力资本的标准衡量具有误导性","authors":"E. Hanushek","doi":"10.23895/KDIJEP.2015.37.2.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a long, dormant period, recent attention has turned to a variety of measurement issues surrounding the concept of human capital. The traditional approach of rely entirely on measures of school attainment, while convenient, is almost certainly misleading. The availability of cognitive skills measures greatly improves on these measurements, but there remains also concern about other unmeasured factors, including noncognitive skills. This paper considers alternative approaches to assessing the role of human capital on individual earnings and on economic growth.","PeriodicalId":32627,"journal":{"name":"KDI Journal of Economic Policy","volume":"37 1","pages":"22-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading\",\"authors\":\"E. Hanushek\",\"doi\":\"10.23895/KDIJEP.2015.37.2.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After a long, dormant period, recent attention has turned to a variety of measurement issues surrounding the concept of human capital. The traditional approach of rely entirely on measures of school attainment, while convenient, is almost certainly misleading. The availability of cognitive skills measures greatly improves on these measurements, but there remains also concern about other unmeasured factors, including noncognitive skills. This paper considers alternative approaches to assessing the role of human capital on individual earnings and on economic growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KDI Journal of Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"22-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KDI Journal of Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23895/KDIJEP.2015.37.2.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KDI Journal of Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23895/KDIJEP.2015.37.2.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在经历了漫长的沉寂期后,最近的注意力转向了围绕人力资本概念的各种测量问题。完全依靠学校成绩衡量的传统方法虽然方便,但几乎肯定是误导的。认知技能测量的可用性大大改善了这些测量,但仍然存在对其他未测量因素的担忧,包括非认知技能。本文考虑了评估人力资本对个人收入和经济增长作用的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading
After a long, dormant period, recent attention has turned to a variety of measurement issues surrounding the concept of human capital. The traditional approach of rely entirely on measures of school attainment, while convenient, is almost certainly misleading. The availability of cognitive skills measures greatly improves on these measurements, but there remains also concern about other unmeasured factors, including noncognitive skills. This paper considers alternative approaches to assessing the role of human capital on individual earnings and on economic growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信