{"title":"加泰罗尼亚重新标准化的评估:问题的定义","authors":"J. Carreras","doi":"10.2436/20.2504.01.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"catalaAquest treball s’emmarca en la nostra recerca sobre avaluacio de la reestandarditzacio del catala (Costa, 2016, 2019, i en premsa a i b). Aquesta recerca intenta explorar fins a quin punt les noves ortografia i gramatica catalanes (IEC, 2016 i 2017) es poden avaluar com ho son la planificacio de la terminologia i la politica i la planificacio linguistiques. En aquest treball s’exposa una analisi dels documents de presentacio de la reestandarditzacio oficial del catala, d’acord amb un model d’avaluacio de la planificacio terminologica (Fathi, 2017) i un d’avaluacio de la politica i la planificacio linguistiques (Gazzola, 2014). Despres de recordar el model d’estandarditzacio de Haugen (1983) amb conceptes complementaris de Cooper (1989), Garvin (1992), Lamuela (1994), Branchadell (2001) i Cerruti, Crocco i Marzo (2017), aquest model s’aborda a partir de les perspectives de Fathi (2017) i Gazzola (2014), amb exemples del que s’ha fet en la reestandarditzacio oficial del catala. Les principals contribucions originals d’aquest treball son aquesta analisi del model de Haugen a partir dels models d’avaluacio de Fathi i Gazzola i l’exposicio de com l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans (IEC) aborda explicitament la definicio del problema que la reestandarditzacio hauria de solucionar. EnglishThis study is set within the framework of our research evaluating the restandardisation of Catalan (Costa, 2016, 2019, and in press-a and in press-b). The purpose of this research is to explore the extent to which the new Catalan spelling and grammar (IEC, 2016 and 2017) can be evaluated in the same way as terminology planning or linguistic policy and planning. This paper makes an analysis of the documents presenting the official restandardisation of Catalan, according to a terminology planning evaluation model (Fathi, 2017) and a linguistic policy and planning evaluation model (Gazzola, 2014). After recalling the standardisation model of Haugen (1983) with supplementary concepts of Cooper (1989), Garvin (1992), Lamuela (1994), Branchadell (2001), and Cerruti, Crocco and Marzo (2017), this model is approached from the standpoints of Fathi (2017) and Gazzola (2014), with examples of what has been done in the official restandardisation of Catalan. The foremost original contributions of this study are this analysis of the Haugen model on the basis of the evaluation models of Fathi and Gazzola, and the description of how IEC explicitly approaches the definition of the problem which the restandardisation should solve.","PeriodicalId":55923,"journal":{"name":"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana","volume":"1 1","pages":"155-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’avaluació de la reestandardització del català: la definició del problema\",\"authors\":\"J. Carreras\",\"doi\":\"10.2436/20.2504.01.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"catalaAquest treball s’emmarca en la nostra recerca sobre avaluacio de la reestandarditzacio del catala (Costa, 2016, 2019, i en premsa a i b). Aquesta recerca intenta explorar fins a quin punt les noves ortografia i gramatica catalanes (IEC, 2016 i 2017) es poden avaluar com ho son la planificacio de la terminologia i la politica i la planificacio linguistiques. En aquest treball s’exposa una analisi dels documents de presentacio de la reestandarditzacio oficial del catala, d’acord amb un model d’avaluacio de la planificacio terminologica (Fathi, 2017) i un d’avaluacio de la politica i la planificacio linguistiques (Gazzola, 2014). Despres de recordar el model d’estandarditzacio de Haugen (1983) amb conceptes complementaris de Cooper (1989), Garvin (1992), Lamuela (1994), Branchadell (2001) i Cerruti, Crocco i Marzo (2017), aquest model s’aborda a partir de les perspectives de Fathi (2017) i Gazzola (2014), amb exemples del que s’ha fet en la reestandarditzacio oficial del catala. Les principals contribucions originals d’aquest treball son aquesta analisi del model de Haugen a partir dels models d’avaluacio de Fathi i Gazzola i l’exposicio de com l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans (IEC) aborda explicitament la definicio del problema que la reestandarditzacio hauria de solucionar. EnglishThis study is set within the framework of our research evaluating the restandardisation of Catalan (Costa, 2016, 2019, and in press-a and in press-b). The purpose of this research is to explore the extent to which the new Catalan spelling and grammar (IEC, 2016 and 2017) can be evaluated in the same way as terminology planning or linguistic policy and planning. This paper makes an analysis of the documents presenting the official restandardisation of Catalan, according to a terminology planning evaluation model (Fathi, 2017) and a linguistic policy and planning evaluation model (Gazzola, 2014). After recalling the standardisation model of Haugen (1983) with supplementary concepts of Cooper (1989), Garvin (1992), Lamuela (1994), Branchadell (2001), and Cerruti, Crocco and Marzo (2017), this model is approached from the standpoints of Fathi (2017) and Gazzola (2014), with examples of what has been done in the official restandardisation of Catalan. The foremost original contributions of this study are this analysis of the Haugen model on the basis of the evaluation models of Fathi and Gazzola, and the description of how IEC explicitly approaches the definition of the problem which the restandardisation should solve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"155-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2504.01.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2504.01.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
catala这项工作嵌入了我们对catala重新标准化评估的研究中(Costa,20162019,and in press a i b)。本研究试图探索新的加泰罗尼亚语拼写和语法(IEC,2016和2017)在多大程度上可以被评估为术语规划和语言政策与规划。根据术语规划评估模型(Fathi,2017)和政策和语言规划评估(Gazzola,2014),本工作对官方目录重新标准化的演示文件进行了分析。在回顾了Haugen标准化模型(1983)以及Cooper(1989)、Garvin(1992)、Lamuela(1994)、Brancadell(2001)和Cerruti、Crocco和March(2017)的补充概念后,从Fathi(2017)和Gazzola(2014)的角度对该模型进行了阐述,并举例说明了加泰罗尼亚官方重新标准化过程中所做的工作。这项工作的主要原始贡献是基于Fathi和Gazzola评估模型对Haugen模型的分析,以及加泰罗尼亚研究所(IEC)如何明确解决重新标准化应解决的问题的定义。英语这项研究是在我们评估加泰罗尼亚语重新标准化的研究框架内进行的(Costa,20162019,以及a版和b版)。本研究的目的是探索新加泰罗尼亚语拼写和语法(IEC,2016和2017)在多大程度上可以像术语规划或语言政策和规划一样进行评估。本文根据术语规划评估模型(Fathi,2017)和语言政策和规划评估模式(Gazzola,2014),对加泰罗尼亚语官方重新标准化的文件进行了分析。在回顾了Haugen(1983)的标准化模型以及Cooper(1989)、Garvin(1992)、Lamuela(1994)、Branchadell(2001)和Cerruti、Crocco和Marzo(2017)的补充概念后,从Fathi(2017年)和Gazzola(2014)的角度对该模型进行了探讨,并举例说明了加泰罗尼亚官方重新标准化所做的工作。本研究最重要的原始贡献是在Fathi和Gazzola评估模型的基础上对Haugen模型进行了分析,并描述了IEC如何明确处理重新标准化应解决的问题的定义。
L’avaluació de la reestandardització del català: la definició del problema
catalaAquest treball s’emmarca en la nostra recerca sobre avaluacio de la reestandarditzacio del catala (Costa, 2016, 2019, i en premsa a i b). Aquesta recerca intenta explorar fins a quin punt les noves ortografia i gramatica catalanes (IEC, 2016 i 2017) es poden avaluar com ho son la planificacio de la terminologia i la politica i la planificacio linguistiques. En aquest treball s’exposa una analisi dels documents de presentacio de la reestandarditzacio oficial del catala, d’acord amb un model d’avaluacio de la planificacio terminologica (Fathi, 2017) i un d’avaluacio de la politica i la planificacio linguistiques (Gazzola, 2014). Despres de recordar el model d’estandarditzacio de Haugen (1983) amb conceptes complementaris de Cooper (1989), Garvin (1992), Lamuela (1994), Branchadell (2001) i Cerruti, Crocco i Marzo (2017), aquest model s’aborda a partir de les perspectives de Fathi (2017) i Gazzola (2014), amb exemples del que s’ha fet en la reestandarditzacio oficial del catala. Les principals contribucions originals d’aquest treball son aquesta analisi del model de Haugen a partir dels models d’avaluacio de Fathi i Gazzola i l’exposicio de com l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans (IEC) aborda explicitament la definicio del problema que la reestandarditzacio hauria de solucionar. EnglishThis study is set within the framework of our research evaluating the restandardisation of Catalan (Costa, 2016, 2019, and in press-a and in press-b). The purpose of this research is to explore the extent to which the new Catalan spelling and grammar (IEC, 2016 and 2017) can be evaluated in the same way as terminology planning or linguistic policy and planning. This paper makes an analysis of the documents presenting the official restandardisation of Catalan, according to a terminology planning evaluation model (Fathi, 2017) and a linguistic policy and planning evaluation model (Gazzola, 2014). After recalling the standardisation model of Haugen (1983) with supplementary concepts of Cooper (1989), Garvin (1992), Lamuela (1994), Branchadell (2001), and Cerruti, Crocco and Marzo (2017), this model is approached from the standpoints of Fathi (2017) and Gazzola (2014), with examples of what has been done in the official restandardisation of Catalan. The foremost original contributions of this study are this analysis of the Haugen model on the basis of the evaluation models of Fathi and Gazzola, and the description of how IEC explicitly approaches the definition of the problem which the restandardisation should solve.