市场中的女佣:女性有偿家务劳动//综述

W. Giles, Sedef Arat-Koç
{"title":"市场中的女佣:女性有偿家务劳动//综述","authors":"W. Giles, Sedef Arat-Koç","doi":"10.2307/25144214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maid in the Market: Women's Paid Domestic Labour Wenona Giles and Sedef Arat - Koc, eds. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 1994; 138 pp.Reviewed by Taru H. Virkamaki Women's Studies York University North York, OntarioWe all know that women have always worked. What has constituted work of value has varied temporally and spatially, and where women's work was placed on the continuum has been determined by social, cultural, economic and political forces. From the rise of industrial capitalism and its attendant reliance on a \"wage system\"(f.1) came the ideological separation of social reproduction from production for use, and the commoditization of labour. The gendered division and devaluation of labour has endured into the twentieth century and continues today in advanced capitalist states, and has emerged as the subject of intense feminist discussion and debate. This theme that, according to the editors of Maid in the Market, \"died rather prematurely\" after a brief tenure in the feminist spotlight of the 1960s and 1970s (p. 4), is reintroduced here to feminist inquiry.The site of investigation in this book is \"women's paid reproductive work in the service sector -- cleaning, tidying, feeding, and caring for and serving people\" (p. 1). Giles and Arat - Koc maintain that there is a direct link between the devaluation of women's unpaid domestic labour in the home and the low pay and poor working conditions in the paid reproductive labour women do in the public sphere. Consequently, what is needed now is a \"new feminist analysis and politics of reproductive work\" (p. 7) informed by a gender, race/ethnic, and class critique that would propose new solutions to the existing domestic labour arrangements shouldered disproportionately by women.There is a sense of nostalgia as Giles and Arat - Koc recall early feminist and communitarian socialist efforts to socialize domestic work in contrast to the ill - fated Marxist socialists who placed women's liberation for industrial work ahead of their liberation from domesticity. \"Material feminists\" in North America came out with practical and innovative solutions to relieve middle - class women of their sole responsibility for home and child care -- \"communes, collective kitchens, cooperative housekeeping schemes\" (p. 3). However, the failure of these solutions to address class and racial/ethnic disparities or to effect the social transformation that would have eased women's burdens is evident today.This book is intended to spark feminist academic and activist interest in formulating new strategies for altering the existing reproductive labour arrangements. Unfortunately, Giles and Arat - Koc do not intend to participate in the formulation of solutions. Instead, they wish to \"leave this to social movements in which [they] hope academics will participate. While sharing the criticisms of the domestic labour debate that it has not provided feminist answers to questions on women's oppression, [they] do not believe it would be adequate to provide feminist answers if that implies solely a concern with issues of gender expressed in universal terms\" (p. 5) (emphasis in the original text). I am troubled with this statement that seems to imply that the conceptualization of feminism itself has become so infused with racist and classist meanings that to posit a feminist solution to the problems of domestic work would be a priori racist and classist. I, for one, believe strongly that any solutions to eliminate women's oppression must be informed by a feminist analysis that in and of itself includes attention to race, ethnicity and class. However, from the introduction, we can assume that the articles in this book will not offer any strategies to overcoming women's oppression. But what we can anticipate are some further insights.The essays that follow reveal the exploitative and oppressive relations that emerge within an advanced capitalist state that function on an economic imperative, and the effects of the uneven economic relations between advanced capitalist and post - colonial regions which produce and allow domination and exploitation of the labour force. …","PeriodicalId":82477,"journal":{"name":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","volume":"24 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25144214","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maid in the Market: Women's Paid Domestic Labour // Review\",\"authors\":\"W. Giles, Sedef Arat-Koç\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/25144214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maid in the Market: Women's Paid Domestic Labour Wenona Giles and Sedef Arat - Koc, eds. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 1994; 138 pp.Reviewed by Taru H. Virkamaki Women's Studies York University North York, OntarioWe all know that women have always worked. What has constituted work of value has varied temporally and spatially, and where women's work was placed on the continuum has been determined by social, cultural, economic and political forces. From the rise of industrial capitalism and its attendant reliance on a \\\"wage system\\\"(f.1) came the ideological separation of social reproduction from production for use, and the commoditization of labour. The gendered division and devaluation of labour has endured into the twentieth century and continues today in advanced capitalist states, and has emerged as the subject of intense feminist discussion and debate. This theme that, according to the editors of Maid in the Market, \\\"died rather prematurely\\\" after a brief tenure in the feminist spotlight of the 1960s and 1970s (p. 4), is reintroduced here to feminist inquiry.The site of investigation in this book is \\\"women's paid reproductive work in the service sector -- cleaning, tidying, feeding, and caring for and serving people\\\" (p. 1). Giles and Arat - Koc maintain that there is a direct link between the devaluation of women's unpaid domestic labour in the home and the low pay and poor working conditions in the paid reproductive labour women do in the public sphere. Consequently, what is needed now is a \\\"new feminist analysis and politics of reproductive work\\\" (p. 7) informed by a gender, race/ethnic, and class critique that would propose new solutions to the existing domestic labour arrangements shouldered disproportionately by women.There is a sense of nostalgia as Giles and Arat - Koc recall early feminist and communitarian socialist efforts to socialize domestic work in contrast to the ill - fated Marxist socialists who placed women's liberation for industrial work ahead of their liberation from domesticity. \\\"Material feminists\\\" in North America came out with practical and innovative solutions to relieve middle - class women of their sole responsibility for home and child care -- \\\"communes, collective kitchens, cooperative housekeeping schemes\\\" (p. 3). However, the failure of these solutions to address class and racial/ethnic disparities or to effect the social transformation that would have eased women's burdens is evident today.This book is intended to spark feminist academic and activist interest in formulating new strategies for altering the existing reproductive labour arrangements. Unfortunately, Giles and Arat - Koc do not intend to participate in the formulation of solutions. Instead, they wish to \\\"leave this to social movements in which [they] hope academics will participate. While sharing the criticisms of the domestic labour debate that it has not provided feminist answers to questions on women's oppression, [they] do not believe it would be adequate to provide feminist answers if that implies solely a concern with issues of gender expressed in universal terms\\\" (p. 5) (emphasis in the original text). I am troubled with this statement that seems to imply that the conceptualization of feminism itself has become so infused with racist and classist meanings that to posit a feminist solution to the problems of domestic work would be a priori racist and classist. I, for one, believe strongly that any solutions to eliminate women's oppression must be informed by a feminist analysis that in and of itself includes attention to race, ethnicity and class. However, from the introduction, we can assume that the articles in this book will not offer any strategies to overcoming women's oppression. But what we can anticipate are some further insights.The essays that follow reveal the exploitative and oppressive relations that emerge within an advanced capitalist state that function on an economic imperative, and the effects of the uneven economic relations between advanced capitalist and post - colonial regions which produce and allow domination and exploitation of the labour force. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":82477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/25144214\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/25144214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/25144214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

《市场中的女佣:妇女的有偿家务劳动》,韦诺娜·贾尔斯和塞德夫·阿拉特-科克主编。哈利法克斯:芬伍德出版社,1994;138页,作者:Taru H. Virkamaki女性研究约克大学,安大略省我们都知道女性一直都在工作。什么是有价值的工作在时间和空间上是不同的,妇女工作在连续体中的位置是由社会、文化、经济和政治力量决定的。工业资本主义的兴起及其对“工资制度”的依赖(f.1)带来了社会再生产与使用生产的意识形态分离,以及劳动的商品化。劳动的性别分工和贬值一直持续到20世纪,并在今天的发达资本主义国家继续存在,并成为女权主义者激烈讨论和辩论的主题。根据《市场上的女仆》的编辑的说法,这个主题在20世纪60年代和70年代女权主义的聚光灯下短暂停留后“过早地消亡了”(第4页),在这里被重新引入女权主义研究。本书的调查地点是“妇女在服务部门的有偿生殖工作——清洁、整理、喂养、照顾和服务他人”(第1页)。Giles和Arat - Koc认为,妇女在家庭中无偿家务劳动的贬值与妇女在公共领域从事的有偿生殖劳动的低工资和恶劣的工作条件之间存在直接联系。因此,现在需要的是一种“关于生育工作的新的女权主义分析和政治”(第7页),以性别、种族/民族和阶级批判为依据,提出新的解决办法,解决由妇女不成比例地承担的现有家务劳动安排。Giles和Arat - Koc回忆起早期女权主义者和社群社会主义者将家务劳动社会化的努力,这与不幸的马克思主义社会主义者形成鲜明对比,后者将女性解放到工业劳动中,而不是从家庭生活中解放出来。北美的“物质女权主义者”提出了实用和创新的解决方案,以减轻中产阶级妇女照顾家庭和孩子的唯一责任——“公社、集体厨房、合作家务计划”(第3页)。然而,这些解决方案在解决阶级和种族/民族差异或影响社会变革方面的失败,本可以减轻妇女的负担,今天很明显。这本书的目的是激发女权主义学术和积极分子的兴趣,制定新的战略,改变现有的生殖劳动安排。不幸的是,Giles和Arat - Koc不打算参与制定解决办法。相反,他们希望“把这个问题留给(他们)希望学术界参与的社会运动。”虽然他们也批评国内劳工辩论没有对关于妇女受压迫的问题提供女权主义的答案,但他们认为,如果提供女权主义的答案仅仅意味着关注以普遍用语表达的性别问题,那么提供女权主义的答案是不够的”(第5页)(原文强调)。我对这种说法感到困扰,它似乎暗示女权主义的概念化本身已经充满了种族主义和阶级主义的含义,以至于假设女权主义解决家务劳动问题将是先验的种族主义和阶级主义。就我个人而言,我坚信,任何消除女性压迫的解决方案都必须以女权主义分析为依据,这种分析本身就包括对种族、民族和阶级的关注。然而,从引言中,我们可以假设这本书中的文章不会提供任何克服女性压迫的策略。但我们可以预测的是一些进一步的见解。接下来的文章揭示了在发达资本主义国家中出现的剥削和压迫关系,这些关系在经济上是必不可少的,以及发达资本主义和后殖民地区之间不平衡的经济关系的影响,这些关系产生并允许对劳动力的统治和剥削。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maid in the Market: Women's Paid Domestic Labour // Review
Maid in the Market: Women's Paid Domestic Labour Wenona Giles and Sedef Arat - Koc, eds. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 1994; 138 pp.Reviewed by Taru H. Virkamaki Women's Studies York University North York, OntarioWe all know that women have always worked. What has constituted work of value has varied temporally and spatially, and where women's work was placed on the continuum has been determined by social, cultural, economic and political forces. From the rise of industrial capitalism and its attendant reliance on a "wage system"(f.1) came the ideological separation of social reproduction from production for use, and the commoditization of labour. The gendered division and devaluation of labour has endured into the twentieth century and continues today in advanced capitalist states, and has emerged as the subject of intense feminist discussion and debate. This theme that, according to the editors of Maid in the Market, "died rather prematurely" after a brief tenure in the feminist spotlight of the 1960s and 1970s (p. 4), is reintroduced here to feminist inquiry.The site of investigation in this book is "women's paid reproductive work in the service sector -- cleaning, tidying, feeding, and caring for and serving people" (p. 1). Giles and Arat - Koc maintain that there is a direct link between the devaluation of women's unpaid domestic labour in the home and the low pay and poor working conditions in the paid reproductive labour women do in the public sphere. Consequently, what is needed now is a "new feminist analysis and politics of reproductive work" (p. 7) informed by a gender, race/ethnic, and class critique that would propose new solutions to the existing domestic labour arrangements shouldered disproportionately by women.There is a sense of nostalgia as Giles and Arat - Koc recall early feminist and communitarian socialist efforts to socialize domestic work in contrast to the ill - fated Marxist socialists who placed women's liberation for industrial work ahead of their liberation from domesticity. "Material feminists" in North America came out with practical and innovative solutions to relieve middle - class women of their sole responsibility for home and child care -- "communes, collective kitchens, cooperative housekeeping schemes" (p. 3). However, the failure of these solutions to address class and racial/ethnic disparities or to effect the social transformation that would have eased women's burdens is evident today.This book is intended to spark feminist academic and activist interest in formulating new strategies for altering the existing reproductive labour arrangements. Unfortunately, Giles and Arat - Koc do not intend to participate in the formulation of solutions. Instead, they wish to "leave this to social movements in which [they] hope academics will participate. While sharing the criticisms of the domestic labour debate that it has not provided feminist answers to questions on women's oppression, [they] do not believe it would be adequate to provide feminist answers if that implies solely a concern with issues of gender expressed in universal terms" (p. 5) (emphasis in the original text). I am troubled with this statement that seems to imply that the conceptualization of feminism itself has become so infused with racist and classist meanings that to posit a feminist solution to the problems of domestic work would be a priori racist and classist. I, for one, believe strongly that any solutions to eliminate women's oppression must be informed by a feminist analysis that in and of itself includes attention to race, ethnicity and class. However, from the introduction, we can assume that the articles in this book will not offer any strategies to overcoming women's oppression. But what we can anticipate are some further insights.The essays that follow reveal the exploitative and oppressive relations that emerge within an advanced capitalist state that function on an economic imperative, and the effects of the uneven economic relations between advanced capitalist and post - colonial regions which produce and allow domination and exploitation of the labour force. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信