无休止的“争论”:进化论及其批评者

Studies in ethics, law, and technology Pub Date : 2009-01-25 DOI:10.2202/1941-6008.1045

J. Borenstein

{"title":"无休止的“争论”:进化论及其批评者","authors":"J. Borenstein","doi":"10.2202/1941-6008.1045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate about evolution continues as another category of critics seeks to challenge its merits. These critics put forward intelligent design (ID) as a scientific rival to evolution. For those familiar with the relevant history, this occurrence resurrects a cycle of debate about evolution that never seems to end. The purpose of this article is to identify key reasons why debate about evolution remains with us.","PeriodicalId":88318,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Endless \\\"Controversy:\\\" Evolution and Its Critics\",\"authors\":\"J. Borenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1941-6008.1045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate about evolution continues as another category of critics seeks to challenge its merits. These critics put forward intelligent design (ID) as a scientific rival to evolution. For those familiar with the relevant history, this occurrence resurrects a cycle of debate about evolution that never seems to end. The purpose of this article is to identify key reasons why debate about evolution remains with us.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in ethics, law, and technology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in ethics, law, and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于进化论的争论仍在继续，另一类批评者试图挑战其优点。这些批评者提出智能设计论(ID)作为进化论的科学对手。对于那些熟悉相关历史的人来说，这一事件使关于进化的辩论循环复活，似乎永远不会结束。这篇文章的目的是找出为什么关于进化论的争论仍然存在的关键原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Endless "Controversy:" Evolution and Its Critics

The debate about evolution continues as another category of critics seeks to challenge its merits. These critics put forward intelligent design (ID) as a scientific rival to evolution. For those familiar with the relevant history, this occurrence resurrects a cycle of debate about evolution that never seems to end. The purpose of this article is to identify key reasons why debate about evolution remains with us.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in ethics, law, and technology

自引率

0.00%

发文量