芬兰为撒哈拉以南非洲性健康和生殖健康及权利提供官方发展援助

R. Shemeikka
{"title":"芬兰为撒哈拉以南非洲性健康和生殖健康及权利提供官方发展援助","authors":"R. Shemeikka","doi":"10.23979/FYPR.45058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finland is one of the donor countries that is most supportive in family planning (FP), Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) and gender issues. This study examines Finnish ODA for FP and SRHR: its decision-making structure, other stakeholders and funding levels. Data consists of documents from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA) and interviews conducted at the MFA and with other experts. While Parliament decides on the overall level of ODA funding, the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development has considerable autonomy. Other stakeholders such as the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Population and Development and the Family Federation of Finland (Vestliitto) engage in advocacy work and have influenced development policy. Although the Development Policy 2007 mentions the importance of health and SRHR issues and HIV/AIDS is a cross-cutting issue, interviewees stated that the importance of health and SRHR in ODA has declined and that the implementation of cross-cutting issues is challenging. Multilateral funding for UNFPA, UNAIDS and GFATM, and thus the proportion of SRHR funding within the health sector, is however currently rising. Funding for population-related activities has increased and represented 4.8% of Finlands total ODA in 2009. Almost all of this funding is directed towards basic reproductive health and HIV/AIDS issues and the majority is directed through multilateral channels (78% in 2009), mainly UNFPA and UNAIDS. IPPF, Ipas and Marie Stopes International also receive support.","PeriodicalId":30177,"journal":{"name":"Finnish Yearbook of Population Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"143-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finnish Official Development Aid for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa\",\"authors\":\"R. Shemeikka\",\"doi\":\"10.23979/FYPR.45058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finland is one of the donor countries that is most supportive in family planning (FP), Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) and gender issues. This study examines Finnish ODA for FP and SRHR: its decision-making structure, other stakeholders and funding levels. Data consists of documents from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA) and interviews conducted at the MFA and with other experts. While Parliament decides on the overall level of ODA funding, the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development has considerable autonomy. Other stakeholders such as the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Population and Development and the Family Federation of Finland (Vestliitto) engage in advocacy work and have influenced development policy. Although the Development Policy 2007 mentions the importance of health and SRHR issues and HIV/AIDS is a cross-cutting issue, interviewees stated that the importance of health and SRHR in ODA has declined and that the implementation of cross-cutting issues is challenging. Multilateral funding for UNFPA, UNAIDS and GFATM, and thus the proportion of SRHR funding within the health sector, is however currently rising. Funding for population-related activities has increased and represented 4.8% of Finlands total ODA in 2009. Almost all of this funding is directed towards basic reproductive health and HIV/AIDS issues and the majority is directed through multilateral channels (78% in 2009), mainly UNFPA and UNAIDS. IPPF, Ipas and Marie Stopes International also receive support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finnish Yearbook of Population Research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"143-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finnish Yearbook of Population Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23979/FYPR.45058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finnish Yearbook of Population Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23979/FYPR.45058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

芬兰是最支持计划生育、性健康和生殖健康及权利以及性别问题的捐助国之一。本研究考察了芬兰对计划生育和SRHR的官方发展援助:其决策结构、其他利益相关者和供资水平。数据包括来自外交部的文件以及在外交部和与其他专家进行的采访。虽然议会决定官方发展援助资金的总体水平,但对外贸易和发展部长有相当大的自主权。其他利益攸关方,如人口与发展问题各党派议会小组和芬兰家庭联合会(Vestliitto),从事宣传工作并影响了发展政策。虽然《2007年发展政策》提到了保健和性别与生殖资源问题的重要性,而且艾滋病毒/艾滋病是一个跨领域问题,但受访者指出,保健和性别与生殖资源问题在官方发展援助中的重要性有所下降,执行跨领域问题具有挑战性。然而,目前向人口基金、艾滋病规划署和全球人口基金提供的多边资金,以及性健康和生殖健康资源在卫生部门的供资比例正在上升。与人口有关的活动的资金有所增加,占2009年芬兰官方发展援助总额的4.8%。几乎所有这些资金都用于基本生殖健康和艾滋病毒/艾滋病问题,其中大部分是通过多边渠道提供的(2009年为78%),主要是人口基金和艾滋病规划署。IPPF、Ipas和Marie Stopes International也得到了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finnish Official Development Aid for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa
Finland is one of the donor countries that is most supportive in family planning (FP), Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) and gender issues. This study examines Finnish ODA for FP and SRHR: its decision-making structure, other stakeholders and funding levels. Data consists of documents from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA) and interviews conducted at the MFA and with other experts. While Parliament decides on the overall level of ODA funding, the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development has considerable autonomy. Other stakeholders such as the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Population and Development and the Family Federation of Finland (Vestliitto) engage in advocacy work and have influenced development policy. Although the Development Policy 2007 mentions the importance of health and SRHR issues and HIV/AIDS is a cross-cutting issue, interviewees stated that the importance of health and SRHR in ODA has declined and that the implementation of cross-cutting issues is challenging. Multilateral funding for UNFPA, UNAIDS and GFATM, and thus the proportion of SRHR funding within the health sector, is however currently rising. Funding for population-related activities has increased and represented 4.8% of Finlands total ODA in 2009. Almost all of this funding is directed towards basic reproductive health and HIV/AIDS issues and the majority is directed through multilateral channels (78% in 2009), mainly UNFPA and UNAIDS. IPPF, Ipas and Marie Stopes International also receive support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信