美国临床患者对药物流产和手术流产方法的选择及满意度。

S. Harvey, L. Beckman, S. J. Satre
{"title":"美国临床患者对药物流产和手术流产方法的选择及满意度。","authors":"S. Harvey, L. Beckman, S. J. Satre","doi":"10.2307/2673784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nAbortion induced by drugs is now a viable alternative to surgically induced abortion for U. S. women. Women's willingness to use these new methods of medical abortion hinges on the extent to which they prove acceptable, however.\n\n\nMETHODS\nAmong 304 women participating in a clinical trial of medical abortion, 186 received a methotrexate-induced abortion and 118 were offered the option of a medical abortion but chose a surgical procedure instead. Study participants completed self-administered questionnaires before the abortion and again at a follow-up visit.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWomen in the medical and surgical abortion groups did not differ significantly with regard to demographic and other background characteristics: Their mean age was about 27, more than two-thirds were white, and three-quarters were unmarried and worked either part-time or full-time. However, women's ratings of seven attributes of abortion methods were significant predictors of choosing a medical abortion: Women were more likely to choose medical abortion if they placed greater importance on a method that was nonsurgical, one that resembled a miscarriage or one that could take place at home (odds ratios, 2.0-3.3). Conversely, women were less likely to choose medical abortion if they valued methods that were quick, that did not involve painful cramping or seeing blood or blood clots and that needed a doctor or nurse to be present (odds ratios, 0.3-0.5). Compared with those who had a surgical abortion, women who had a methotrexate-induced abortion expected more bleeding (mean scores, 3.5 vs. 3. 1) and reported more pain (3.4 vs. 2.9), heavier bleeding (3.4 vs. 2.5) and bleeding of longer duration (3.3 vs. 2.6). The overwhelming majority of women in the medical and surgical abortion groups reported that they were either very or somewhat satisfied with their abortion method (81% and 82%, respectively), would recommend it to others (82% and 78%) and would choose the method again (89% and 93%).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFactors affecting the choice of abortion method appear to be numerous and complex. Providers need to be sensitive to differences in women's values and life circumstances when counseling them about an abortion method. In particular, providers should incorporate into their counseling sessions what women need to know about the characteristics of abortion methods and help women to identify what is the best option for them.","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"33 5 1","pages":"212-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2673784","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of and satisfaction with methods of medical and surgical abortion among U.S. clinic patients.\",\"authors\":\"S. Harvey, L. Beckman, S. J. Satre\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2673784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nAbortion induced by drugs is now a viable alternative to surgically induced abortion for U. S. women. Women's willingness to use these new methods of medical abortion hinges on the extent to which they prove acceptable, however.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nAmong 304 women participating in a clinical trial of medical abortion, 186 received a methotrexate-induced abortion and 118 were offered the option of a medical abortion but chose a surgical procedure instead. Study participants completed self-administered questionnaires before the abortion and again at a follow-up visit.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWomen in the medical and surgical abortion groups did not differ significantly with regard to demographic and other background characteristics: Their mean age was about 27, more than two-thirds were white, and three-quarters were unmarried and worked either part-time or full-time. However, women's ratings of seven attributes of abortion methods were significant predictors of choosing a medical abortion: Women were more likely to choose medical abortion if they placed greater importance on a method that was nonsurgical, one that resembled a miscarriage or one that could take place at home (odds ratios, 2.0-3.3). Conversely, women were less likely to choose medical abortion if they valued methods that were quick, that did not involve painful cramping or seeing blood or blood clots and that needed a doctor or nurse to be present (odds ratios, 0.3-0.5). Compared with those who had a surgical abortion, women who had a methotrexate-induced abortion expected more bleeding (mean scores, 3.5 vs. 3. 1) and reported more pain (3.4 vs. 2.9), heavier bleeding (3.4 vs. 2.5) and bleeding of longer duration (3.3 vs. 2.6). The overwhelming majority of women in the medical and surgical abortion groups reported that they were either very or somewhat satisfied with their abortion method (81% and 82%, respectively), would recommend it to others (82% and 78%) and would choose the method again (89% and 93%).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nFactors affecting the choice of abortion method appear to be numerous and complex. Providers need to be sensitive to differences in women's values and life circumstances when counseling them about an abortion method. In particular, providers should incorporate into their counseling sessions what women need to know about the characteristics of abortion methods and help women to identify what is the best option for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family planning perspectives\",\"volume\":\"33 5 1\",\"pages\":\"212-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2673784\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family planning perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2673784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2673784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

对美国妇女来说,药物流产现在是一种可行的替代手术流产的方法。然而,妇女是否愿意使用这些新的药物流产方法取决于它们在多大程度上被证明是可接受的。方法在304例药物流产临床试验中,186例接受甲氨蝶呤人工流产,118例接受药物流产但选择手术。研究参与者在堕胎前完成了自我管理的问卷调查,并在随访期间再次完成问卷调查。结果药物流产组和手术流产组的妇女在人口统计学和其他背景特征方面没有显著差异:她们的平均年龄约为27岁,超过三分之二是白人,四分之三未婚,兼职或全职工作。然而,妇女对流产方法的七个属性的评分是选择药物流产的重要预测因素:如果妇女更重视非手术方法、类似流产的方法或可以在家中进行的方法,则她们更有可能选择药物流产(优势比,2.0-3.3)。相反,如果妇女重视快速、不涉及痛苦的痉挛、看不到血或血凝块、需要医生或护士在场的方法,她们就不太可能选择药物流产(优势比为0.3-0.5)。与手术流产的妇女相比,甲氨蝶呤流产的妇女出血更多(平均评分,3.5 vs. 3)。1)并且报告了更多的疼痛(3.4 vs 2.9),更严重的出血(3.4 vs 2.5)和更长的出血持续时间(3.3 vs 2.6)。药物流产组和手术流产组中绝大多数妇女报告说,她们对自己的流产方法非常满意或比较满意(分别为81%和82%),会向他人推荐(82%和78%),并会再次选择该方法(89%和93%)。结论影响流产方式选择的因素众多且复杂。在就堕胎方法向妇女提供咨询时,提供者需要对妇女的价值观和生活环境的差异保持敏感。特别是,提供者应将妇女需要了解的堕胎方法的特点纳入其咨询课程,并帮助妇女确定对她们来说什么是最好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice of and satisfaction with methods of medical and surgical abortion among U.S. clinic patients.
CONTEXT Abortion induced by drugs is now a viable alternative to surgically induced abortion for U. S. women. Women's willingness to use these new methods of medical abortion hinges on the extent to which they prove acceptable, however. METHODS Among 304 women participating in a clinical trial of medical abortion, 186 received a methotrexate-induced abortion and 118 were offered the option of a medical abortion but chose a surgical procedure instead. Study participants completed self-administered questionnaires before the abortion and again at a follow-up visit. RESULTS Women in the medical and surgical abortion groups did not differ significantly with regard to demographic and other background characteristics: Their mean age was about 27, more than two-thirds were white, and three-quarters were unmarried and worked either part-time or full-time. However, women's ratings of seven attributes of abortion methods were significant predictors of choosing a medical abortion: Women were more likely to choose medical abortion if they placed greater importance on a method that was nonsurgical, one that resembled a miscarriage or one that could take place at home (odds ratios, 2.0-3.3). Conversely, women were less likely to choose medical abortion if they valued methods that were quick, that did not involve painful cramping or seeing blood or blood clots and that needed a doctor or nurse to be present (odds ratios, 0.3-0.5). Compared with those who had a surgical abortion, women who had a methotrexate-induced abortion expected more bleeding (mean scores, 3.5 vs. 3. 1) and reported more pain (3.4 vs. 2.9), heavier bleeding (3.4 vs. 2.5) and bleeding of longer duration (3.3 vs. 2.6). The overwhelming majority of women in the medical and surgical abortion groups reported that they were either very or somewhat satisfied with their abortion method (81% and 82%, respectively), would recommend it to others (82% and 78%) and would choose the method again (89% and 93%). CONCLUSIONS Factors affecting the choice of abortion method appear to be numerous and complex. Providers need to be sensitive to differences in women's values and life circumstances when counseling them about an abortion method. In particular, providers should incorporate into their counseling sessions what women need to know about the characteristics of abortion methods and help women to identify what is the best option for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信